Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 
Send Topic Print
Should Gillard Be Dumped A.S.A.P? (Read 3025 times)
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Should Gillard Be Dumped A.S.A.P?
Reply #75 - Apr 17th, 2012 at 2:03am
 
62% dissatisfaction

Less people trust Gillard than Abbott.
Newspoll Trustworthiness: Gillard 44 (-17 since 2010 election) Abbott 54 (-4) #auspol

What is Labor waiting for. Gillard has got to go.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
olde.sault
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2913
Re: Should Gillard Be Dumped A.S.A.P?
Reply #76 - Apr 17th, 2012 at 7:51am
 
____ wrote on Apr 16th, 2012 at 9:12am:
Is there still time to replace Gillard and for Labor to lift their primary higher than the current 20's before the next election.

If Labor is so set on giving government away with no fight, should they now limit their loses?

Should Gillard be dumped A.S.A.P for a more popular leader?


Why are you so simple?

What difference will it make if Gillard changes the colour of her hair, wears more lipstick or another Labor imbecile pushes her off her rickety perch?

It is the years of lunatic schemes, billion-dollar waste to activate them, all this hoax-babble about global warming and the imminent carbon tax that is the problem!

Even God would be scratching his head in despair!

Where had the Labor nest found this lot? Scratched them out from under rocks?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Should Gillard Be Dumped A.S.A.P?
Reply #77 - Apr 17th, 2012 at 7:55am
 
olde.sault wrote on Apr 17th, 2012 at 7:51am:
____ wrote on Apr 16th, 2012 at 9:12am:
Is there still time to replace Gillard and for Labor to lift their primary higher than the current 20's before the next election.

If Labor is so set on giving government away with no fight, should they now limit their loses?

Should Gillard be dumped A.S.A.P for a more popular leader?


Why are you so simple?

What difference will it make if Gillard changes the colour of her hair, wears more lipstick or another Labor imbecile pushes her off her rickety perch?

It is the years of lunatic schemes, billion-dollar waste to activate them, all this hoax-babble about global warming and the imminent carbon tax that is the problem!

Even God would be scratching his head in despair!

Where had the Labor nest found this lot? Scratched them out from under rocks?




What?


Can you repeat, and this time in English?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
PZ547
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9282
Gender: male
Re: Should Gillard Be Dumped A.S.A.P?
Reply #78 - Apr 17th, 2012 at 8:08am
 
It's my opinion that Gillard was emplaced to fulfill certain tasks

No-one with an eye on longevity in politics wanted to be seen to be the one to do it.  Hence Rudd (very ambitious) was seen to be 'dumped' by his party -- in order Gillard (who doesn't give a rats about her political future as she'll be well paid later) has fulfilled the role of 'villain'

In the fulness of time, Rudd will emerge again, clothed in the mantle of 'goody boy victim' -- and will grow the agenda implemented by Gillard

For the sake of appearance, there will be the usual Musical Chairs tactic, whereby a pretence of 'change of government' will be effected --  but that's only because we have short attention spans and need novelty-injections, which in turn is why we have a pretence of a two-party system, when in fact anyone with an ounce of intelligence is aware it's all ONE party.  And it's controlled not by the Aussie voter but by overseas interests

So Gillard's not sweating about being dumped.  She expects it.  We all expect it.  It would be justified.  But unfortunately it won't change a thing, just as getting rid of Little Johnny didn't reverse GST

Gillard's done the job she was put in place to do.  No doubt she can't wait to be 'dumped'.  She must be champing at the bit to be free of the whole thing and to get on with the well-funded, privileged rest of her life
Back to top
 

All my comments, posts & opinions are to be regarded as satire & humour
 
IP Logged
 
MOTR
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6646
Re: Should Gillard Be Dumped A.S.A.P?
Reply #79 - Apr 17th, 2012 at 8:13am
 
PZ547 wrote on Apr 17th, 2012 at 8:08am:
It's my opinion that Gillard was emplaced to fulfill certain tasks

No-one with an eye on longevity in politics wanted to be seen to be the one to do it.  Hence Rudd (very ambitious) was seen to be 'dumped' by his party -- in order Gillard (who doesn't give a rats about her political future as she'll be well paid later) has fulfilled the role of 'villain'

In the fulness of time, Rudd will emerge again, clothed in the mantle of 'goody boy victim' -- and will grow the agenda implemented by Gillard

For the sake of appearance, there will be the usual Musical Chairs tactic, whereby a pretence of 'change of government' will be effected --  but that's only because we have short attention spans and need novelty-injections, which in turn is why we have a pretence of a two-party system, when in fact anyone with an ounce of intelligence is aware it's all ONE party.  And it's controlled not by the Aussie voter but by overseas interests

So Gillard's not sweating about being dumped.  She expects it.  We all expect it.  It would be justified.  But unfortunately it won't change a thing, just as getting rid of Little Johnny didn't reverse GST

Gillard's done the job she was put in place to do.  No doubt she can't wait to be 'dumped'.  She must be champing at the bit to be free of the whole thing and to get on with the well-funded, privileged rest of her life


Rudd has been burned. If there was a desire to bring Rudd back they wouldn't have so thoroughly destroyed his reputation.

A change is likely, but it will never be Rudd.
Back to top
 

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."
 
IP Logged
 
olde.sault
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2913
Re: Should Gillard Be Dumped A.S.A.P?
Reply #80 - Apr 17th, 2012 at 8:51am
 
____ wrote on Apr 17th, 2012 at 7:55am:
olde.sault wrote on Apr 17th, 2012 at 7:51am:
____ wrote on Apr 16th, 2012 at 9:12am:
Is there still time to replace Gillard and for Labor to lift their primary higher than the current 20's before the next election.

If Labor is so set on giving government away with no fight, should they now limit their loses?

Should Gillard be dumped A.S.A.P for a more popular leader?


Why are you so simple?

What difference will it make if Gillard changes the colour of her hair, wears more lipstick or another Labor imbecile pushes her off her rickety perch?

It is the years of lunatic schemes, billion-dollar waste to activate them, all this hoax-babble about global warming and the imminent carbon tax that is the problem!

Even God would be scratching his head in despair!

Where had the Labor nest found this lot? Scratched them out from under rocks?




What?


Can you repeat, and this time in English?


What about criticising yourself, like, what do you mean by your initial announcement:

"Less people trust Gillard than Abbott" ???

I was momentary confused but I persevered. . .

It should have read:" "Less people trust Gillard than they trust Abbott".

Anyway, stop being coy - you understood exactly what I meant.

Seems, Labor politicians are made up mainly of union heavies, individuals who hadn't studied nor worked hard, just bulldozed themselves into powerful positions and now, either through stupidity or venomous intent, have destroyed the economy.

Wake up, Greenhorn!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Should Gillard Be Dumped A.S.A.P?
Reply #81 - Apr 21st, 2012 at 9:10am
 
If labor wants to lose the next election with honour rather than be crushed, it will replace Gillard now.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 
Send Topic Print