____ wrote on Apr 17
th, 2012 at 7:55am:
olde.sault wrote on Apr 17
th, 2012 at 7:51am:
____ wrote on Apr 16
th, 2012 at 9:12am:
Is there still time to replace Gillard and for Labor to lift their primary higher than the current 20's before the next election.
If Labor is so set on giving government away with no fight, should they now limit their loses?
Should Gillard be dumped A.S.A.P for a more popular leader?
Why are you so simple?
What difference will it make if Gillard changes the colour of her hair, wears more lipstick or another Labor imbecile pushes her off her rickety perch?
It is the years of lunatic schemes, billion-dollar waste to activate them, all this hoax-babble about global warming and the imminent carbon tax that is the problem!
Even God would be scratching his head in despair!
Where had the Labor nest found this lot? Scratched them out from under rocks?
What?
Can you repeat, and this time in English?
What about criticising yourself, like, what do you mean by your initial announcement:
"Less people trust Gillard than Abbott" ???
I was momentary confused but I persevered. . .
It should have read:" "Less people trust Gillard than they trust Abbott".
Anyway, stop being coy - you understood exactly what I meant.
Seems, Labor politicians are made up mainly of union heavies, individuals who hadn't studied nor worked hard, just bulldozed themselves into powerful positions and now, either through stupidity or venomous intent, have destroyed the economy.
Wake up, Greenhorn!