Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
The Greens - headed for extinction? (Read 1275 times)
skippy.
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 20882
Gender: male
Re: The Greens - headed for extinction?
Reply #15 - Apr 14th, 2012 at 4:54pm
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 14th, 2012 at 4:45pm:
kika wrote on Apr 14th, 2012 at 3:09pm:
i think bob's decision was based on the legal requirement for all parties to nominate their senators for another 6 year term prior to the next fed. election.   bob said that, at the age of 67, it was time to step aside for younger applicants.

i will miss him in the green party, but he will still be around, and continue to grow in influence and stature.

i'm also excited about christine m. and the future of the greens, other progressive parties and independents in our parliaments.

in my opinion, i see the old labor and liberal parties as relevant to the last century and the industrial age.  its obvious that they are confused about how deal with the very different challenges of this century, and are also terrified of change.  and change is inevitable.





You can think that if you want, but all of us here in the real world know why he quit. He was jumping ship before forced to walk the plank by an electorate fed up to the gills with the insane policies and incompetence of this minority Labor/Greens government and in particular, opposition to the carbon and mining taxes!

The problem with that fantasy, Tony's office girl, is Brown was a cert to be re elected by a Tassy electorate for another 6 years, do you practice being an idiot, or does it come naturally,sweety?
Back to top
 

  freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL
Click onWWW below 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: The Greens - headed for extinction?
Reply #16 - Apr 14th, 2012 at 4:54pm
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 14th, 2012 at 4:45pm:
kika wrote on Apr 14th, 2012 at 3:09pm:
i think bob's decision was based on the legal requirement for all parties to nominate their senators for another 6 year term prior to the next fed. election.   bob said that, at the age of 67, it was time to step aside for younger applicants.

i will miss him in the green party, but he will still be around, and continue to grow in influence and stature.

i'm also excited about christine m. and the future of the greens, other progressive parties and independents in our parliaments.

in my opinion, i see the old labor and liberal parties as relevant to the last century and the industrial age.  its obvious that they are confused about how deal with the very different challenges of this century, and are also terrified of change.  and change is inevitable.





You can think that if you want, but all of us here in the real world know why he quit. He was jumping ship before forced to walk the plank by an electorate fed up to the gills with the insane policies and incompetence of this minority Labor/Greens government and in particular, opposition to the carbon and mining taxes!



Yet Greens are not the government. Of course I understand the political process of democracy may be hard for Regressives to grasp, since this point has been made over and over and over.

Greens will be upfront at the next election, proud of all our achievements this term.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 29356
Gender: male
Re: The Greens - headed for extinction?
Reply #17 - Apr 14th, 2012 at 4:56pm
 
skippy. wrote on Apr 14th, 2012 at 4:54pm:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 14th, 2012 at 4:45pm:
kika wrote on Apr 14th, 2012 at 3:09pm:
i think bob's decision was based on the legal requirement for all parties to nominate their senators for another 6 year term prior to the next fed. election.   bob said that, at the age of 67, it was time to step aside for younger applicants.

i will miss him in the green party, but he will still be around, and continue to grow in influence and stature.

i'm also excited about christine m. and the future of the greens, other progressive parties and independents in our parliaments.

in my opinion, i see the old labor and liberal parties as relevant to the last century and the industrial age.  its obvious that they are confused about how deal with the very different challenges of this century, and are also terrified of change.  and change is inevitable.





You can think that if you want, but all of us here in the real world know why he quit. He was jumping ship before forced to walk the plank by an electorate fed up to the gills with the insane policies and incompetence of this minority Labor/Greens government and in particular, opposition to the carbon and mining taxes!

The problem with that fantasy, Tony's office girl, is brown was a cert to be re elected by a Tassy electorate for another 6 years, do you practice being an idiot, or does it come naturally,sweety?


I didn't say HE would not get re-elected. My point was that following the next election, Abbott would be PM with a vast majority (something Gillard could never obtain) and with that majority, the Greens would once again be irrelevant and Bob Brown would be reduced to rambling, nonsensical speeches at logging protests that no media would turn up for.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 29356
Gender: male
Re: The Greens - headed for extinction?
Reply #18 - Apr 14th, 2012 at 4:57pm
 
____ wrote on Apr 14th, 2012 at 4:54pm:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 14th, 2012 at 4:45pm:
kika wrote on Apr 14th, 2012 at 3:09pm:
i think bob's decision was based on the legal requirement for all parties to nominate their senators for another 6 year term prior to the next fed. election.   bob said that, at the age of 67, it was time to step aside for younger applicants.

i will miss him in the green party, but he will still be around, and continue to grow in influence and stature.

i'm also excited about christine m. and the future of the greens, other progressive parties and independents in our parliaments.

in my opinion, i see the old labor and liberal parties as relevant to the last century and the industrial age.  its obvious that they are confused about how deal with the very different challenges of this century, and are also terrified of change.  and change is inevitable.





You can think that if you want, but all of us here in the real world know why he quit. He was jumping ship before forced to walk the plank by an electorate fed up to the gills with the insane policies and incompetence of this minority Labor/Greens government and in particular, opposition to the carbon and mining taxes!



Yet Greens are not the government. Of course I understand the political process of democracy may be hard for Regressives to grasp, since this point has been made over and over and over.

Greens will be upfront at the next election, proud of all our achievements this term.



That's the spirit - stick to your insane policies, no matter how many people intend to not vote for ya!  Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
skippy.
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 20882
Gender: male
Re: The Greens - headed for extinction?
Reply #19 - Apr 14th, 2012 at 5:09pm
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 14th, 2012 at 4:56pm:
skippy. wrote on Apr 14th, 2012 at 4:54pm:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 14th, 2012 at 4:45pm:
kika wrote on Apr 14th, 2012 at 3:09pm:
i think bob's decision was based on the legal requirement for all parties to nominate their senators for another 6 year term prior to the next fed. election.   bob said that, at the age of 67, it was time to step aside for younger applicants.

i will miss him in the green party, but he will still be around, and continue to grow in influence and stature.

i'm also excited about christine m. and the future of the greens, other progressive parties and independents in our parliaments.

in my opinion, i see the old labor and liberal parties as relevant to the last century and the industrial age.  its obvious that they are confused about how deal with the very different challenges of this century, and are also terrified of change.  and change is inevitable.





You can think that if you want, but all of us here in the real world know why he quit. He was jumping ship before forced to walk the plank by an electorate fed up to the gills with the insane policies and incompetence of this minority Labor/Greens government and in particular, opposition to the carbon and mining taxes!

The problem with that fantasy, Tony's office girl, is brown was a cert to be re elected by a Tassy electorate for another 6 years, do you practice being an idiot, or does it come naturally,sweety?


I didn't say HE would not get re-elected. My point was that following the next election, Abbott would be PM with a vast majority (something Gillard could never obtain) and with that majority, the Greens would once again be irrelevant and Bob Brown would be reduced to rambling, nonsensical speeches at logging protests that no media would turn up for.

As the bits I've highlighted show, you did say he would walk the plank, IE not be re elected. I think you're related to  matty . You would have to be related to be as stupid as you are and try and back out of comments that can be highlighted so easily so as to show you up as the lying fool you are.
Back to top
 

  freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL
Click onWWW below 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 29356
Gender: male
Re: The Greens - headed for extinction?
Reply #20 - Apr 14th, 2012 at 5:27pm
 
skippy. wrote on Apr 14th, 2012 at 5:09pm:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 14th, 2012 at 4:56pm:
skippy. wrote on Apr 14th, 2012 at 4:54pm:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 14th, 2012 at 4:45pm:
kika wrote on Apr 14th, 2012 at 3:09pm:
i think bob's decision was based on the legal requirement for all parties to nominate their senators for another 6 year term prior to the next fed. election.   bob said that, at the age of 67, it was time to step aside for younger applicants.

i will miss him in the green party, but he will still be around, and continue to grow in influence and stature.

i'm also excited about christine m. and the future of the greens, other progressive parties and independents in our parliaments.

in my opinion, i see the old labor and liberal parties as relevant to the last century and the industrial age.  its obvious that they are confused about how deal with the very different challenges of this century, and are also terrified of change.  and change is inevitable.





You can think that if you want, but all of us here in the real world know why he quit. He was jumping ship before forced to walk the plank by an electorate fed up to the gills with the insane policies and incompetence of this minority Labor/Greens government and in particular, opposition to the carbon and mining taxes!

The problem with that fantasy, Tony's office girl, is brown was a cert to be re elected by a Tassy electorate for another 6 years, do you practice being an idiot, or does it come naturally,sweety?


I didn't say HE would not get re-elected. My point was that following the next election, Abbott would be PM with a vast majority (something Gillard could never obtain) and with that majority, the Greens would once again be irrelevant and Bob Brown would be reduced to rambling, nonsensical speeches at logging protests that no media would turn up for.

As the bits I've highlighted show, you did say he would walk the plank, IE not be re elected. I think you're related to  matty . You would have to be related to be as stupid as you are and try and back out of comments that can be highlighted so easily so as to show you up as the lying fool you are.


Yes, as in he would no longer be de-facto PM...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: The Greens - headed for extinction?
Reply #21 - Apr 21st, 2012 at 9:21am
 
The greens will withing 6 years revert to their prior 2-3% vote and become as irrelevant as they deserve.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print