BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Mar 5
th, 2012 at 9:27pm:
Qu: How many Nuclear Weapons were fired in retaliation to the anthrax attacks on America?
Jew Behind Anthrax Attacks
http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-hatehoaxes-911-anthrax-terrorist-attack.html
http://www.salon.com/2002/01/26/assaad/
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/anthraxsuspect.php
Anthrax MysteryImmediately after the anthrax attacks, White House officials repeatedly pressured FBI Director Robert Mueller to prove that they were a second-wave assault by Al Qaeda. During the president's morning intelligence briefings, Mueller was "beaten up" for not producing proof that the killer spores were the handiwork of terrorist mastermind Osama Bin Laden, according to a former aide. "They really wanted to blame somebody in the Middle East," the retired senior FBI official stated. The FBI knew early on that the anthrax used was a weaponized version requiring sophisticated equipment and was unlikely to have been produced in some "cave". At the same time, both President Bush and Vice President Cheney in public statements speculated about the possibility of a link between the anthrax attacks and Al Qaeda.
On May 9, 2002, New Scientist published an article that reported:
'The DNA sequence of the anthrax sent through the US mail in 2001 has been revealed and confirms suspicions that the bacteria originally came from a US military laboratory. The data released uses codenames for the reference strains against which the attack strain was compared. The two reference strains that appear identical to the attack strain most likely originated at the US Army Medical Research Institute for Infectious Diseases at Fort Detrick (USAMRIID), Maryland. The new work also shows that substantial genetic differences can emerge in two samples of an anthrax culture separated for only three years. This means the attacker's anthrax was not separated from its ancestors at USAMRIID for many generations.'
Ivins main suspect.Ivins passed a polygraph-assisted interrogation (also known as a "lie detector test") in which he was questioned about his possible participation in the anthrax attacks.
Those who argue for Ivins' innocence claim that the anthrax used in the attacks was too sophisticated to be produced by a lone researcher without relevant training. "In my opinion, there are maybe four or five people in the whole country who might be able to make this stuff, and I'm one of them," said Richard O. Spertzel, former deputy commander of USAMRIID. "And even with a good lab and staff to help run it, it might take me a year to come up with a product as good." The spores in the Daschle letter were 1.5 to 3 micrometres across, many times smaller than the finest known grade of anthrax produced by either the U.S. or Soviet bioweapons programs. An electron microscope, which costs hundreds of thousands of dollars, would be needed to verify that the target spore size had been consistently achieved.
The notesThe New York Post and NBC News letters contained the following note:
09-11-01
THIS IS NEXT
TAKE PENACILIN NOW
DEATH TO AMERICA
DEATH TO ISRAEL
ALLAH IS GREAT
An obvious attempt to false flag muslim involvement, and bring sympathy to Israel.
The second anthrax noteThe second note that was addressed to Senators Daschle and Leahy read:
09-11-01
YOU CAN NOT STOP US.
WE HAVE THIS ANTHRAX.
YOU DIE NOW.
ARE YOU AFRAID?
DEATH TO AMERICA.
DEATH TO ISRAEL.
ALLAH IS GREAT.
Ivins was a Roman Catholic. The Frederick News-Post has made public several letters to the editor written by Ivins dealing with his religious views. (A Catholic is not likely to care much about Israel.) So who wrote the letters?
The Ames strain comes in two forms: non-virulent and virulent. The difference between them is that the virulent anthrax produces toxin proteins and encapsulates itself with a protective layer, which means it can survive. The non-virulent, which has been mutated to make it non-infectious, does not produce toxin proteins or protect itself. It is the latter form that has been made available to most researchers. But only five known labs in US have specimens of the virulent strain— the Department of Agriculture lab at Iowa State (which now destroyed its specimens), the Center for Disease Control in Atlanta, the US Army Medical Research Institute at Fort Detrick in Maryland, the lab at Louisiana State University and the lab Northern Arizona University. At each lab, the specimens are kept under lock and key, and everyone who uses them is recorded. But the FBI has not been able to find any source in these known repositories. This suggest that the anthrax came from a foreign or unknown repository.
The bacteria spores in the Daschle and Leahy letters were as small as one micron and concentrated to a density estimated to be a trillion spores per gram. This meant that the larger spores found in a wet slurry form had been dried and miniaturized in a process that had not destroyed their protective coats. To be sure, military labs in the US had achieved these results by drying, freezing and cascading spores through computer-controlled mills of super-hard ball bearings, but these CBW factories were dismantled in the 1970s. Where such stealthed equipment exists today is unknown.
Would Jews Have A Motive To Attack Senator Leahy?
Sen. Leahy likens Palestinians to his Irish ancestors, ‘hunted because they wanted to keep their land’
by Philip Weiss on March 9, 2009
The Vermont senator is on the floor of the Senate now, debating the Kyl amendments on the omnibus appropriations bill. One of them bars Palestinian refugees of Gaza from resettling here, because they come from a "terrorist" land, as Leahy characterized the legislation. The senator then compared the Palestinian experience to his own ancestors in Ireland. They too were called terrorists once, because they were "fighting to keep their land," fighting for their votes and freedom, religion and language. And "hunted" for doing so– "hunted because they had fought to practice their own religion… hunted because they wanted to keep their land…
"Thank goodness the United States had open arms for them." The amendment, Leahy says, "goes against everything we stand for."
http://mondoweiss.net/2009/03/sen-leahy-likens-palestinians-to-his-irish-ancestors-hunted-because-they-wanted-to-keep-their-land.html
How Leahy tried, and failed, to downgrade aid to IsraelAnd here's the story, published here for the first time. It involves Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont, who has never been one of Israel's staunchest friends on the Hill. Leahy is often critical of the policies and behavior of the Israel (and sometimes rightly so). He is also the Chairman of the State-Foreign Operations Appropriations Subcommittee. In this position, he tried last week - and intimately failed - to change the language of the "Fiscal Year 2008 State and Foreign Operations Appropriations bill," in ways not favorable to Israel.Israeli Newspaper (Haaretz) (http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/rosnerBlog.jhtml?itemNo=877394&contrassID=25&subContrassID=0&sbSubContrassID=1&listSrc=Y&art=1)
Anthrax Letters Posted From Nassau Street Near princetonNassau Street is the main downtown thoroughfare of Princeton, New Jersey. As such, of all the streets in Princeton, Nassau Street is the one most often full of automobile and pedestrian traffic. The main gates of Princeton University open onto Nassau Street opposite Nassau Hall.
In August 2002, about 600 mailboxes that could have been used to mail the letters associated with the 2001 anthrax attacks were tested for anthrax. Just one was found to be positive for the spores, at 10 Nassau Street.
7 synagogues in Nassau street, another 5 synogogues and Jewish centres within 2 kilometres from the postal box where the anthrax letters were mailed.
Doubts about anthrax storySurvivors, relatives wonder if dead scientist was truly the culprit
The New York Times reported that investigators intensively questioned his children, Andrew and Amanda, now both 24. One former colleague, Dr. W. Russell Byrne, said the agents pressed Ivins' daughter repeatedly to acknowledge that her father was involved in the attacks.
"It was not an interview," Byrne said. "It was a frank attempt at intimidation."
Byrne said he believed Ivins was singled out partly because of his personal weaknesses. "If they had real evidence on him, why did they not just arrest him?"Baltimore Sun (http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nation-world/bal-te.anthrax05aug05,0,2121592.story)
Although the anthrax preparations were of different grades, all of the material was derived from the same bacterial strain. Known as the Ames strain, it was first researched at the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID), Fort Detrick, Maryland. The Ames strain was then distributed to at least fifteen bio-research labs within the U.S. and six locations overseas.(including Israel.)
Forum
Pages: 
