Australian Politics Forum - Two Party Preference

matty

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male

Re: Two Party Preference
Reply #30 - Feb 26^th, 2012 at 5:09pm

adelcrow wrote on Feb 26^th, 2012 at 4:20pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Feb 26^th, 2012 at 4:17pm:

____ wrote on Feb 26^th, 2012 at 1:23pm:

So the hard right don't use prefencing to their own advantage.

Is that why they are currently in the political wilderness will all their hopes pinned on a lame duck?

in government in three out of 6 states and about to be 4. infront by a country mile federally.

only a fool calls that the wilderness, but then again it is the green_goober...

Its called the political cycle, both Labor and the Coalition are in exactly the same situation at different times of the cycle.
History and personal experience shows us that its nothing to get excited about

Labor are unlikely to be elected for about another 20 years, at least.

Back to top

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Two Party Preference
Reply #31 - Feb 27^th, 2012 at 10:31am

matty wrote on Feb 26^th, 2012 at 5:06pm:

My analysis of the cross-bencher's chances come next election:

1. Katter - will definitely be re-elected. He is popular in his electorate, and abided by their wish for him to side with the Coalition.

2. Oakeshott - will definitelty be annihilated. He has continuously defied and ignore his electorate, in siding with Labor, and keeping this incompetent, lying and deceitful so-called government in power.

3. Windsor - will lose soundly. Same as Oakeshott, yet won't be on the same scale, as he is more popular, and not as laughable, and idiotic.

4. Crook - will probably lose, I imagine that the Liberals will regain the seat, as Crook has made some questionable calls, such as voting for the floody levy.

5. Bandt - will lose, because the Liberals will be preferencing Labor over him. He lost on the primary vote last election, and would not have been elected if not for Liberal preferences.

6. Wilkie - the most unknown and uncertain one of all. Hard to say, he will probably need preferences from both Labor and Liberals in order to have any chance, being that he came third last election. Both parties are likely to preference him ahead of each other, so he is in with a chance.

all corroect except Wilkie. Libs and labor will both keep preferences from him. Libs cant win the seat but they can ensure the fool Wilkie does as punishment for his stupidity.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

tonegunman1

Senior Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 427

Re: Two Party Preference
Reply #32 - Feb 27^th, 2012 at 11:17am

longweekend58 wrote on Feb 27^th, 2012 at 10:31am:

matty wrote on Feb 26^th, 2012 at 5:06pm:

My analysis of the cross-bencher's chances come next election:

1. Katter - will definitely be re-elected. He is popular in his electorate, and abided by their wish for him to side with the Coalition.

2. Oakeshott - will definitelty be annihilated. He has continuously defied and ignore his electorate, in siding with Labor, and keeping this incompetent, lying and deceitful so-called government in power.

3. Windsor - will lose soundly. Same as Oakeshott, yet won't be on the same scale, as he is more popular, and not as laughable, and idiotic.

4. Crook - will probably lose, I imagine that the Liberals will regain the seat, as Crook has made some questionable calls, such as voting for the floody levy.

5. Bandt - will lose, because the Liberals will be preferencing Labor over him. He lost on the primary vote last election, and would not have been elected if not for Liberal preferences.

6. Wilkie - the most unknown and uncertain one of all. Hard to say, he will probably need preferences from both Labor and Liberals in order to have any chance, being that he came third last election. Both parties are likely to preference him ahead of each other, so he is in with a chance.

all corroect except Wilkie. Libs and labor will both keep preferences from him. Libs cant win the seat but they can ensure the fool Wilkie does as punishment for his stupidity.

Don't forget Peter Slipper......who will also lose his seat at the next election.

Back to top

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Two Party Preference
Reply #33 - Feb 28^th, 2012 at 6:16pm

tonegunman1 wrote on Feb 27^th, 2012 at 11:17am:

longweekend58 wrote on Feb 27^th, 2012 at 10:31am:

matty wrote on Feb 26^th, 2012 at 5:06pm:

My analysis of the cross-bencher's chances come next election:

1. Katter - will definitely be re-elected. He is popular in his electorate, and abided by their wish for him to side with the Coalition.

2. Oakeshott - will definitelty be annihilated. He has continuously defied and ignore his electorate, in siding with Labor, and keeping this incompetent, lying and deceitful so-called government in power.

3. Windsor - will lose soundly. Same as Oakeshott, yet won't be on the same scale, as he is more popular, and not as laughable, and idiotic.

4. Crook - will probably lose, I imagine that the Liberals will regain the seat, as Crook has made some questionable calls, such as voting for the floody levy.

5. Bandt - will lose, because the Liberals will be preferencing Labor over him. He lost on the primary vote last election, and would not have been elected if not for Liberal preferences.

6. Wilkie - the most unknown and uncertain one of all. Hard to say, he will probably need preferences from both Labor and Liberals in order to have any chance, being that he came third last election. Both parties are likely to preference him ahead of each other, so he is in with a chance.

all corroect except Wilkie. Libs and labor will both keep preferences from him. Libs cant win the seat but they can ensure the fool Wilkie does as punishment for his stupidity.

Don't forget Peter Slipper......who will also lose his seat at the next election.

I dont think Slipper will stand. He'd be stupid to even try. Not only is he an independent in a safe liberal seat, he is also a national traitor to his party and a drunk and a few other things. He'd be very wise to just hide...

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged