Australian Politics Forum - Explicit Pictures

Frances

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3577
In a Castle in the Hills
Gender: female

Re: Explicit Pictures
Reply #135 - May 4^th, 2012 at 8:09pm

blackadder wrote on May 4^th, 2012 at 4:10pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 4^th, 2012 at 4:01pm:

Frances wrote on May 4^th, 2012 at 3:59pm:

The name is Franc

e

s and not Franc

i

s. In my case, one letter makes a big difference. And sorry, but I have no intention of discussing my sex life on this forum....

Which forum then?

Maybe this one....http://www.redhotpie.com.au/

I thought I'd wait until I got home, rather than click on that link at work and, no, I've never even seen that site before, let alone posted anything there. I don't need something like that anyway.....

Back to top

Sure God created man before woman. But then you always make a rough draft before the final masterpiece.

IP Logged

Johnsmith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 4716 Gender:	Re: Explicit Pictures Reply #136 - May 4^th, 2012 at 8:37pm freediver wrote on May 4^th, 2012 at 7:37pm: People today are desensitised to violence, but within limits, which is why those graphic war photos still have an impact. I challenge you to find anything like them from Hollywood. It would put people off their popcorn. Saving Private Ryan was pretty graphic ...
Back to top	When politicians offer you something for nothing, or something that sounds too good to be true, it's always worth taking a careful second look. (Malcolm Turncoat) IP Logged

Emma

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 9853
OZ
Gender: female

Re: Explicit Pictures
Reply #137 - May 4^th, 2012 at 8:40pm

News isn't only on at dinnertime, BUT I have seen things on the six o'clock News (whatever) I would rather have not. Perhaps you don't watch much TV news? I find SBS the best, of Oz stations.

Did you see the footage of the footballer breaking his leg recently??
It wasn't shown very much, more referred to, later on.

That was on free-to-air News.
It wasn't nice to see, ..and it wasn't necessary to be seen, but it was shown nonetheless.

Another example of an explicit picture, IMO.

Back to top

live every day

IP Logged

Emma Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 9853 OZ Gender:	Re: Explicit Pictures Reply #138 - May 4^th, 2012 at 8:43pm Batbrain... I didn't view it. I have seen the movie however, ...and don't intend to view your posted clip. But ,............ I wouldn't put myself in that position to begin with.
Back to top	live every day IP Logged

Avram Horowitz

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3153
Australia
Gender: male

Re: Explicit Pictures
Reply #139 - May 4^th, 2012 at 8:56pm

mantra wrote on May 4^th, 2012 at 7:41pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on May 4^th, 2012 at 2:28pm:

mantra wrote on May 4^th, 2012 at 2:05pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on May 4^th, 2012 at 12:08pm:

Do you still think 9/11 was "benefitial" and "a shame they didn't get more"?

Or do you accept these comments are appalling and you retract them?

This is your opportunity to apologise.

People are entitled to their views. So what if some members hate Jews - there is just as much hate thrown around here in regard to Muslims. I see few people jumping in to defend the disgusting and negative comments directed at them.

All those whinging about unpleasant pictures and anti-semitic comments come across as quite hypocritical. Obviously your opinions aren't censored, yet you demand that others are.

So what????

If you need me to point out what is wrong with that, then there is little hope for you as a reasonable contributer.

And who are you to call yourself judge? Many of your posts are highly offensive because of the demeaning, racist and condescending attitude you direct at people generally.

We all think differently and this needs to be accepted whether you like it or not. You can't shut people up just because you or someone else with a similar narrow attitude doesn't approve.

Disgrace comments from mantra.

Back to top

IP Logged

Johnsmith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 4716
Gender: male

Re: Explicit Pictures
Reply #140 - May 4^th, 2012 at 8:59pm

Avram Horowitz wrote on May 4^th, 2012 at 8:56pm:

mantra wrote on May 4^th, 2012 at 7:41pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on May 4^th, 2012 at 2:28pm:

mantra wrote on May 4^th, 2012 at 2:05pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on May 4^th, 2012 at 12:08pm:

Do you still think 9/11 was "benefitial" and "a shame they didn't get more"?

Or do you accept these comments are appalling and you retract them?

This is your opportunity to apologise.

People are entitled to their views. So what if some members hate Jews - there is just as much hate thrown around here in regard to Muslims. I see few people jumping in to defend the disgusting and negative comments directed at them.

All those whinging about unpleasant pictures and anti-semitic comments come across as quite hypocritical. Obviously your opinions aren't censored, yet you demand that others are.

So what????

If you need me to point out what is wrong with that, then there is little hope for you as a reasonable contributer.

And who are you to call yourself judge? Many of your posts are highly offensive because of the demeaning, racist and condescending attitude you direct at people generally.

We all think differently and this needs to be accepted whether you like it or not. You can't shut people up just because you or someone else with a similar narrow attitude doesn't approve.

Disgrace comments from mantra.

Disgraceful person Avramm

Back to top

When politicians offer you something for nothing, or something that sounds too good to be true, it's always worth taking a careful second look.
(Malcolm Turncoat)

IP Logged

Emma

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 9853
OZ
Gender: female

Re: Explicit Pictures
Reply #141 - May 4^th, 2012 at 9:24pm

I don't agree with you

great one

.

You are being unreasonable, in that you feel free to say what you please, and yet Av can't be also allowed to say what he believes? ?

OK Av has said the same about other posters, I see that,
and if one considers equality to mean ...'everyone is treated the same' then perhaps what you say has some basis.

But I don't view equality as 'one size MUST fit all'. We all have our own views, derived from our own life experience, and our own wounds. To insist that only one view prevails is obviously up for argument.

And that's where equality falls into the 'Too Hard' basket.

Much easier to have everyone on the same 'plane'.
Not going to happen.

And.... I guess that applies to you too Av,.... and to me... and to all of us.
We either learn to live together, or face a future of endless strife and conflict.
What do you think will happen?? Hmm?
We'll all live happily ever after if only this... or that..... Not going to happen.

Our current political dichotomy is a perfect example.

Back to top

live every day

IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 120178 Melbourne Gender:	Re: Explicit Pictures Reply #142 - May 6^th, 2012 at 9:48am Bobby. wrote on May 4^th, 2012 at 4:50pm: What about fake pictures? see: http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1336011092/19#19 A supposed pic of nail & me which is fake. Why shouldn't blackadder be banned? FD, When will I receive justice for the wrongs committed against me? How can blackadder get away with it?
Back to top	IP Logged

muso

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male

Re: Explicit Pictures
Reply #143 - May 6^th, 2012 at 10:54am

Bobby. wrote on May 6^th, 2012 at 9:48am:

Bobby. wrote on May 4^th, 2012 at 4:50pm:

What about fake pictures?

see:
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1336011092/19#19

A supposed pic of nail & me which is fake.
Why shouldn't blackadder be banned?

FD,
When will I receive justice for the wrongs committed against me?
How can blackadder get away with it?

It's on me, mate. (warning nudity)

Back to top

1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not

IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 120178 Melbourne Gender:	Re: Explicit Pictures Reply #144 - May 6^th, 2012 at 11:09am Very funny Freediver. OK - I'll get my blackadder fake pics ready.
Back to top	IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 120178 Melbourne Gender:	Re: Explicit Pictures Reply #145 - May 6^th, 2012 at 11:26am What a nice pic: Blackadder and his boyfriend - what a happy couple.
Back to top	Blackadder___his_boyfriend_.jpg (195 KB \| 42 ) IP Logged

muso Gold Member Offline Posts: 13151 Gladstone, Queensland Gender:	Re: Explicit Pictures Reply #146 - May 6^th, 2012 at 1:05pm Bobby. wrote on May 6^th, 2012 at 11:09am: Very funny Freediver. OK - I'll get my blackadder fake pics ready. It wasn't from FD.
Back to top	1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 120178 Melbourne Gender:	Re: Explicit Pictures Reply #147 - May 6^th, 2012 at 1:27pm muso wrote on May 6^th, 2012 at 1:05pm: Bobby. wrote on May 6^th, 2012 at 11:09am: Very funny Freediver. OK - I'll get my blackadder fake pics ready. It wasn't from FD. OK - sorry. Very funny Muso, OK - I'll get my blackadder fake pics ready
Back to top	IP Logged

blackadder Gold Member Offline Posts: 1977	Re: Explicit Pictures Reply #148 - May 6^th, 2012 at 5:03pm Batpoo B4 Jenny Craig
Back to top	Batpoo_B4_Jenny_Craig_.jpg (6 KB \| 45 ) The trouble with quotes on the internet is that it's difficult to determine whether or not they are genuine - Abraham Lincoln IP Logged

Life_goes_on Gold Member Offline Posts: 4772 400kms south of Yobsville, Qld Gender:	Re: Explicit Pictures Reply #149 - May 6^th, 2012 at 5:14pm I haven't read back, so I'll assume this is some kind of competition.
Back to top	"You're just one lucky motherf-cker" - Someone, 5th February 2013 Num num num num. IP Logged