Kat wrote on Feb 18
th, 2012 at 7:11pm:
matty wrote on Feb 18
th, 2012 at 6:17pm:
Kat wrote on Feb 18
th, 2012 at 6:13pm:
IMO, Labor is toast if they stick with the Red Dalek.
At least with Rudd, they may have a chance, especially
if he has used his ousting as a learning-experience.
He'd need to put the cleaners through the current Cabinet
and Caucus, and ruthlessly crush any dissent, but a
revitalised, Rudd-led Labor govt is the best option currently
available to us.
Julia is toxic, and Abbott and his crew are no option at all.
And as for the Greens......
Exactly, a revitalised Rudd is just what our country needs. He will make a far better PM than any other politician in Canberra. We need a strong Labor government, because Tony Abbott would be an asbolute disaster, unlike Rudd, who will make this country paradise on earth. We won't need to worry about heaven, because we will be living in it if Rudd is reinstated. He will turn hate to love, war to peace, and misery to happiness.
Matty, you've made many insightful, witty, relevant and
incisive comments since you've been here....
Unfortunately, that wasn't one of 'em.....
Yes, Matty has many insights, but he usually doesn't post them.
As if Rudd's coming back. Labor had one falling on their sword chance, and they've used it up. Personally, I can't see what's wrong with Gillard. Things are going fine. Gillard's got one problem.
The electorate hate her. They hate her for no other reason than they hate her. They'd hate her if she didn't say:
THERE WILL BE NO CARBON TAX UNDER A GOVERNMENT I LEAD.
They'd hate her if she didn't assasinate Rudd. They hated him too, remember?
So Gillard will go, but it will be the electorate that finish her off. In the end, Labor won't take the risk. And why would Rudd? Apart from sheer vanity, what's in it for him? Wouldn't his legacy be better as a martyr than a loser?
I can't see Labor making the same mistake twice. I know the back benchers are itchy, but the long-term damage to Labor will be far worse if they put Rudd back in. And we all know that with Rudd, they'll lose anyway.
Labor can't win. All Gillard can do now is keep the chair warm for Abbott. As sad and tawdry as this is, as much as it sh!ts all over the very notion of democracy in this country, this is destiny. Short of a real assasination, it's our fate to be led by a dull ideologue with no policies and no vision.
This isn't to say that Abbott is not creative. But let's be honest, we all know very little about Abbott. We don't know what he'll do, and we have absolutely no idea what he stands for. Abbott is a shapeshifter with the sole ambition of getting elected. Apart from his dogged loyalty to mining companies, the fossil lobbies and the church, we don't know where he stands.
Rudd was a very indecisive PM. In the face of huge unpopularity, Gillard is able to delgate, consult and get things done. In the end, this is the job of leaders. The choices are put on the plate in front of you, and I doubt you can ever tell where they'll take you.
You can end up like Howard, or you can end up like Gillard. The winds that take you there are fickle, but the forces that blow those winds are heavy.
Big mining, the business lobbies, News Ltd, and the ones we don't even know about. These are the forces that are driving this country, and as dark as it is, these are the forces that will determine our destiny.