Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Send Topic Print
Should it be legal to kill pet cats on the loose (Read 19386 times)
FriYAY
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7395
Re: Should it be legal to kill pet cats on the loose
Reply #45 - May 30th, 2013 at 4:47pm
 
1993Zebra wrote on May 30th, 2013 at 4:30pm:
FriYAY wrote on May 30th, 2013 at 4:27pm:
1993Zebra wrote on May 30th, 2013 at 4:17pm:
FriYAY wrote on May 30th, 2013 at 4:13pm:
1993Zebra wrote on May 30th, 2013 at 2:56pm:
Now, some people, or person I should say, think that cats should not be allowed to roam around outside and to keep them locked up.
I did a study in animal behaviour and there was a section covered about cats. If a cat does not get the chance to roam, their development process gets destroyed and more often than not, they have a lot of problems in their older years.
A cat that roams is a healthy cat, killing small animals is just an instinctive behaviour. Trying to get a cat to stop killing things is like telling a cheetah that it has to stop killing things.



How to stop a cat killing things;

1.      Set trap
2.      Catch cat
3.      Empty into bag
4.      Throw bag into rubbish bin full of water
5.      Put lid on bin
6.      Come back 30 minutes later
7.      You now have a harmless cat

Smiley

Easy


I suppose I should do that to dogs. They roam around killing my chickens and poo on my front yard. I guess I should stick them into a garbage bin full of water with a few bricks on top of the garbage bin lid.


Try locking your chickens up  Wink


My chickens are locked up, it's just some are very persistent and dig underneath it. So I think, I'll start killing the dogs, because the owners won't keep them locked up.



Fair enough.

How do you think you’ll do it?

Bait?

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
miketrees
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6492
Gender: male
Re: Should it be legal to kill pet cats on the loose
Reply #46 - May 30th, 2013 at 4:50pm
 
Not baits, they are dangerous, and illegal in most cases.
should not be mentioned
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
FriYAY
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7395
Re: Should it be legal to kill pet cats on the loose
Reply #47 - May 30th, 2013 at 4:52pm
 
miketrees wrote on May 30th, 2013 at 4:50pm:
Not baits, they are dangerous, and illegal in most cases.
should not be mentioned



I’ll mention what I want. Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 120301
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Should it be legal to kill pet cats on the loose
Reply #48 - May 30th, 2013 at 4:58pm
 
What about the pretty pussy?

...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
St George of the Garden
Gold Member
*****
Offline


http://tinyurl.com/n
3o8m2x

Posts: 9809
Gender: male
Re: Should it be legal to kill pet cats on the loose
Reply #49 - May 30th, 2013 at 10:04pm
 
1993Zebra wrote on May 30th, 2013 at 4:37pm:
St George of the Garden wrote on May 30th, 2013 at 4:35pm:
Just keep your damn cat out my damn backyard!

There used to be native cats. . .


Then keep your dog out of my backyard.

My dog is either inside, in my damn backyard or in the house, unlike those damn cats! Think I will make a shangai!
Back to top
 

I want Muso as GMod. Bring back Muso!
WWW Friends of the National Broadband Network  
IP Logged
 
Kat
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Socialism IS the answer.

Posts: 17709
Everywhere and no-where
Gender: female
Re: Should it be legal to kill pet cats on the loose
Reply #50 - May 30th, 2013 at 10:57pm
 
There are some very sick attitudes on display here.

If anyone hurts an animal of mine, I will hunt them down and hurt them.

You can bank on it.
Back to top
 

...
 
IP Logged
 
Grey
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5341
Gender: male
Re: Should it be legal to kill pet cats on the loose
Reply #51 - May 31st, 2013 at 2:59am
 
bobbythefap1 wrote on Feb 17th, 2012 at 1:59pm:
... wrote on Feb 17th, 2012 at 1:54pm:
bobbythefap1 wrote on Feb 17th, 2012 at 1:50pm:
Here is my reasoning, especially in a nation like Australia.
It is ok for cat owners to let their cats go out and kill native animals so why is it wrong to kill a cat to prevent them killing native animals?

Isn’t it the same logic?

Its not like I want this to be the case tho, I would much rather cat owners take responsibility and lock up their cats so to not damage their environment and threaten the extinction of native animals.

There is no reason for cats to be wandering the streets, the argument that ‘they are wild and use to wander around before humans’ is bunk because so did dogs but we can’t let them out can we?

But if cat owners will not take responsibility why can I not use the same logic they do and stop their cat from killing other animals.



Ahh yes, another cat hater dressing his hatred up as concern for native wildlife.  Where is your concern when clearing blocks for human habitation?  By your rreasoning we shopuld be able to kill developers, or anyone who lives in rural areas.  Afetr all, they do more damage to native wildlife than a million cats could.
Pets are seen as part of the family.  Kill a member of ones family, and see the response you get.

I don’t hate cats; I hate pet owners who don’t take responsibility and proper care for their animals. Part of caring for any other animal on the planet is making sure it can’t hurt itself or other animals; why should cats be any different?
I have huge concern for clearing nature for human habituation if it’s not sustainable but that’s not the issue here.
There are ways that developers can do their work sustainably, just like a cat owner can lock up their cat. So a developer can be fined/jailed and cats can be culled.
So if I keep a pet lion that runs around killing people it’s ok cause its part of the family?
If it was part of the family you would keep it safe and make sure it’s not a danger to anything.


I've always shared my space with a cat, I've never owned one, though I pick up the tab for food and vet bills.


http://www.gutenberg.org/files/2781/2781-h/2781-h.htm#link2H_4_0011

People have shared their space with cats for thousands of years. Now some freedom hating morons think they know better. But councils that have banned cats are getting overrun with rodents.

Cats are not 'great predators of marsupials', or birds. That's not to say they never kill them, but rodents are their niche market. A feral cat will charge a rabbit and take its head clean off in an awesome display of speed, skill and ferocity. It'll half heartedly hone its skills stalking a bird or a bilby. If the bird or bilby is sick or old they might be caught and that's the environmental benefit of cats.  They might also catch a pidgeon or a twentyeight parrot which are so slow it's a wonder they've survived this long, but they do and well.

Note, the feral animals that compete with native animals for the same foods are the threat. Cats predate on rabbits and other rodents in preference to anything else. A pal of mine used to shoot out on the nullarbor plain. He had his quota of Kangaroos to cull and shot cats when he could. When the farmers noticed the dead cats (and the effect) he was told off roundly, "whaddya think keeps down the rabbits mate?"

Birds fly, cats don't. That's what makes a cat a very poor predator of birds. A good predator is another bird and Australia is full of excellent raptors. Butcher birds too are very ruthless killers of other birds. All small marsupials are much better at climbing than cats. Cats are slow and ponderass climbers. Possums scoff at cats. Cats climb to escape danger, not to pose a danger.

Cats have lived in Australia almost as long as dingoes. Cats are a totem animal of indigenous desert people who respect them very much. They established themselves here way earlier than Europeople settlement, (.

Environmentalism 101, the top predators are the most vulnerable part of the food chain.

For example, The east african savannah, perhaps the richest graceland on the planet, supports a wide range of animals. But it's wall to wall with wilderbeeste and zebra, not cats. The grazing animals are always on the move. When they have young they can run almost within the hour. Cats have young, they have to stay put for a year to raise them. Just as true for a moggie in the bush as it is for a cheetah.

So why has the cat got such a reputation in Australia? Classic scapegoating! Controlled burns of bush to reduce the risk of fire to human settlements takes place in Spring. When the bush is still a bit wet and wont burn too fiercely> That's the theory anyway. Mostly prescibed burns turn into raging fires. They try to do too much at once. Setting the fires by aerial bombing.

What they are trying to burn is the dead plant material on the forest floor. They call it 'fuel', you could call it mulch, you could call it food. If you extract timber and you extract the mulch and you don't fertilise, (which of course you don't because to fertilise the forest of Australia would use the worlds remaining phosphate reserves in a year), you continuously erode the forest capability to support itself and its critters. Apart from which if you burn in s
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 31st, 2013 at 3:16am by Grey »  

"It is in the shelter of each other that the people live" - Irish Proverb
 
IP Logged
 
Grey
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5341
Gender: male
Re: Should it be legal to kill pet cats on the loose
Reply #52 - May 31st, 2013 at 3:10am
 
...cont. Apart from which if you burn in spring, you burn the baby animals, in nests and holes.

The city where I live, Busselton on the coast of the South West forest, Possums are really a pest. The Western ringtail possum is an endangered animal in its natural habitat. Cats get the blame, yet the city is full of possums and cats. There IS a feral menace in Australia, and it's not the cat, it's not even the fox. To an extent the introduced domestic animals sheep and cows are a problem but the No1 is us. Stop blaming cats they do far more good than harm.
Back to top
 

"It is in the shelter of each other that the people live" - Irish Proverb
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 120301
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Should it be legal to kill pet cats on the loose
Reply #53 - May 31st, 2013 at 9:47am
 
You can't hurt the pussy.  Shocked
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: Should it be legal to kill pet cats on the loose
Reply #54 - May 31st, 2013 at 1:25pm
 
Grey, No one owns a cat, it's always the other way around..
Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
Grey
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5341
Gender: male
Re: Should it be legal to kill pet cats on the loose
Reply #55 - May 31st, 2013 at 1:29pm
 
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 31st, 2013 at 1:25pm:
Grey, No one owns a cat, it's always the other way around..


Grin I know, I blame the Egyptians. Once they were declared Gods there was no turning back...
Back to top
 

"It is in the shelter of each other that the people live" - Irish Proverb
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 120301
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Should it be legal to kill pet cats on the loose
Reply #56 - May 31st, 2013 at 1:37pm
 
Don't hurt the pussy.     Cry Cry Cry Cry Cry Cry


...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: Should it be legal to kill pet cats on the loose
Reply #57 - May 31st, 2013 at 4:35pm
 
bobbythefap1 wrote on Feb 17th, 2012 at 1:50pm:
Here is my reasoning, especially in a nation like Australia.
It is ok for cat owners to let their cats go out and kill native animals so why is it wrong to kill a cat to prevent them killing native animals?

Isn’t it the same logic?

Its not like I want this to be the case tho, I would much rather cat owners take responsibility and lock up their cats so to not damage their environment and threaten the extinction of native animals.

There is no reason for cats to be wandering the streets, the argument that ‘they are wild and use to wander around before humans’ is bunk because so did dogs but we can’t let them out can we?

But if cat owners will not take responsibility why can I not use the same logic they do and stop their cat from killing other animals.

Lol- smoking crack makes people dream of rivers of blood!

  Shocked Shocked

(Not really, it just makes them psuedo-hardcore!!)  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy  Roll Eyes  Huh  Shocked
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: Should it be legal to kill pet cats on the loose
Reply #58 - May 31st, 2013 at 4:36pm
 
(Actually, no really it does: hence America and it's followers being terrorised into submission!)

Cry Cry
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
mantra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ozpolitic.com

Posts: 10750
Gender: female
Re: Should it be legal to kill pet cats on the loose
Reply #59 - May 31st, 2013 at 5:15pm
 
Grey wrote on May 31st, 2013 at 2:59am:
What they are trying to burn is the dead plant material on the forest floor. They call it 'fuel', you could call it mulch, you could call it food. If you extract timber and you extract the mulch and you don't fertilise, (which of course you don't because to fertilise the forest of Australia would use the worlds remaining phosphate reserves in a year), you continuously erode the forest capability to support itself and its critters.

Apart from which if you burn in spring, you burn the baby animals, in nests and holes.


Is any consideration ever given to these native animals in controlled burning? Does it even help that much when we have so many arsonists on the loose? It's bad enough for our bush creatures when the real bushfires hit them, but it's too much of a struggle when they're subject to fire unnecessarily.

They have to cope with cattle now being reintroduced into national parks trampling everything flat, alongside hunters, predators and overly zealous humans.

We really don't have much respect for animals here. Australia is one of the world leaders in creating endangered and extinct species of fauna (and flora).
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Send Topic Print