Australian Politics Forum - Tut tut Gillard acceptance speech

adelcrow

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20133
everywhere
Gender: male

Re: Tut tut Gillard acceptance speech
Reply #60 - Feb 14^th, 2012 at 5:47pm

Maqqa wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 5:45pm:

adelcrow wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 3:59pm:

With the Greens in control of a hostile Senate Abbott would have had to impliment a carbon pollution solution that pleased the Greens just as Julia had to.
I suppose that means that Abbott would have had to change policies to keep power just as Julia did or call a DD and end up with even more Greens in the Senate Grin

Its called "Get the F#(K out of my way or I'll call a double dissolution on you!" policy

I dare Bob Brown to vote against it - MAKE MY DAY!

Yep..people that vote Green will change their mind and vote for the coalition come a DD Grin

Green voters just looooove Abbott Grin

Back to top

Go the Bunnies

IP Logged

Maqqa

Gold Member

Offline

14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000

Re: Tut tut Gillard acceptance speech
Reply #61 - Feb 14^th, 2012 at 5:49pm

adelcrow wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 5:47pm:

Maqqa wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 5:45pm:

adelcrow wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 3:59pm:

With the Greens in control of a hostile Senate Abbott would have had to impliment a carbon pollution solution that pleased the Greens just as Julia had to.
I suppose that means that Abbott would have had to change policies to keep power just as Julia did or call a DD and end up with even more Greens in the Senate Grin

Its called "Get the F#(K out of my way or I'll call a double dissolution on you!" policy

I dare Bob Brown to vote against it - MAKE MY DAY!

Yep..people that vote Green will change their mind and vote for the coalition come a DD Grin

Green voters just looooove Abbott Grin

See - even you acknowledge the Greens will lose votes

Back to top

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number

IP Logged

adelcrow

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20133
everywhere
Gender: male

Re: Tut tut Gillard acceptance speech
Reply #62 - Feb 14^th, 2012 at 5:52pm

Maqqa wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 5:49pm:

adelcrow wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 5:47pm:

Maqqa wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 5:45pm:

adelcrow wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 3:59pm:

With the Greens in control of a hostile Senate Abbott would have had to impliment a carbon pollution solution that pleased the Greens just as Julia had to.
I suppose that means that Abbott would have had to change policies to keep power just as Julia did or call a DD and end up with even more Greens in the Senate Grin

Its called "Get the F#(K out of my way or I'll call a double dissolution on you!" policy

I dare Bob Brown to vote against it - MAKE MY DAY!

Yep..people that vote Green will change their mind and vote for the coalition come a DD Grin

Green voters just looooove Abbott Grin

See - even you acknowledge the Greens will lose votes

yep..thats what I was saying ;
but first Abbott has to beat Rudd at the next election Grin

Back to top

Go the Bunnies

IP Logged

juliar

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 22966

Re: Tut tut Gillard acceptance speech
Reply #63 - Feb 14^th, 2012 at 6:04pm

In Question Time today Australians saw the

real Juliar - nasty, spiteful, vicious, and full of hate

. Don't get too close !!!!

Prime Minister in

full vitriolic anger flow

today - and spat the dummy and suddenly got to her feet and closed off Question Time over her shoulder as she was walking out - seething - left everyone sitting there amazed! Definitely chucking multiple menopausals.

You see, if you can't handle it - close it down!

Oh, she's good this one!

We were treated to a close-up of Thomson. Urk.

Even Slipper looked amazed!

All very slippery!

http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/blogs/the-pulse/politics-live-february-14...

Back to top

IP Logged

adelcrow

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20133
everywhere
Gender: male

Re: Tut tut Gillard acceptance speech
Reply #64 - Feb 14^th, 2012 at 6:06pm

juliar wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 6:04pm:

In Question Time today Australians saw the

real Juliar - nasty, spiteful, vicious, and full of hate

. Don't get too close !!!!

Prime Minister in

full vitriolic anger flow

today - and spat the dummy and suddenly got to her feet and closed off Question Time over her shoulder as she was walking out - seething - left everyone sitting there amazed! Definitely chucking multiple menopausals.

You see, if you can't handle it - close it down!

Oh, she's good this one!

We were treated to a close-up of Thomson. Urk.

Even Slipper looked amazed!

All very slippery!

http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/blogs/the-pulse/politics-live-february-14...

Dont worry...Kevon 07 will be back in power by the end of the month

Back to top

Go the Bunnies

IP Logged

juliar

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 22966

Re: Tut tut Gillard acceptance speech
Reply #65 - Feb 14^th, 2012 at 6:24pm

Does Kevin12 have the approval of the Sussex St Union power brokers ? If so, when will the magic day be ?

If Miss Gillard is already so fowl that it could lay eggs what will the red witch
be like when the Sussex St union power brokers replace it with Kevin 12 ?

Will it become violent ? Will it resign ? Will it dump the dirt on all sorts of union affairs going all the way back to the Slater and Gordon days ? Will it keep handbag Tim ? Will it cry crocodile tears during the leave the lodge speech ?

Back to top

IP Logged

chicken_lipsforme

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7090
Townsville NQ
Gender: male

Re: Tut tut Gillard acceptance speech
Reply #66 - Feb 15^th, 2012 at 8:42am

Quote:

"Prime Minister Julia Gillard is set to face new leadership questions, amid claims she handed out negative polling on Kevin Rudd before taking over the reigns".

"Ms Gillard has rejected claims this week that she worked with staff and Labor colleagues behind the scenes weeks before Mr Rudd stepped down in June 2010".

"But new claims have surfaced, saying that Ms Gillard had personally handed copies of secret internal polling to her Labor colleagues in the days before challenging Mr Rudd, Fairfax reported on Tuesday".

"Labor MPs claim she used the polling to persuade them to support her for the top job".

Sprung!!!
Oh, what a wicked web we weave, when first we practice to deceive.
The cow couldn't lie straight in bed.
I hope she enjoys today in Parliament when Abbott launches against her on this, her latest big new lie.
Abbott will tear her apart on this one.
Everything she touches turns to crap.

Back to top

"Another boat, another policy failure from the Howard government"

Julia Gillard
Shadow Health Minister
2003.

IP Logged

adelcrow

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20133
everywhere
Gender: male

Re: Tut tut Gillard acceptance speech
Reply #67 - Feb 15^th, 2012 at 8:45am

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Feb 15^th, 2012 at 8:42am:

Quote:

"Prime Minister Julia Gillard is set to face new leadership questions, amid claims she handed out negative polling on Kevin Rudd before taking over the reigns".

"Ms Gillard has rejected claims this week that she worked with staff and Labor colleagues behind the scenes weeks before Mr Rudd stepped down in June 2010".

"But new claims have surfaced, saying that Ms Gillard had personally handed copies of secret internal polling to her Labor colleagues in the days before challenging Mr Rudd, Fairfax reported on Tuesday".

"Labor MPs claim she used the polling to persuade them to support her for the top job".

Sprung!!!
Oh, what a wicked web we weave, when first we practice to deceive.
The cow couldn't lie straight in web.
I hope she enjoys today in Parliament when Abbott launches against her on this, her latest big new lie.
Abbott will tear her apart on this one.
Everything she touches turns to crap.

Dont worry...Kevin 07 is saddling up to save the day for the Labor govt.
Julia is yesterdays news.

Back to top

Go the Bunnies

IP Logged

chicken_lipsforme

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7090
Townsville NQ
Gender: male

Re: Tut tut Gillard acceptance speech
Reply #68 - Feb 15^th, 2012 at 8:53am

adelcrow wrote on Feb 15^th, 2012 at 8:45am:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Feb 15^th, 2012 at 8:42am:

Quote:

"Prime Minister Julia Gillard is set to face new leadership questions, amid claims she handed out negative polling on Kevin Rudd before taking over the reigns".

"Ms Gillard has rejected claims this week that she worked with staff and Labor colleagues behind the scenes weeks before Mr Rudd stepped down in June 2010".

"But new claims have surfaced, saying that Ms Gillard had personally handed copies of secret internal polling to her Labor colleagues in the days before challenging Mr Rudd, Fairfax reported on Tuesday".

"Labor MPs claim she used the polling to persuade them to support her for the top job".

Sprung!!!
Oh, what a wicked web we weave, when first we practice to deceive.
The cow couldn't lie straight in web.
I hope she enjoys today in Parliament when Abbott launches against her on this, her latest big new lie.
Abbott will tear her apart on this one.
Everything she touches turns to crap.

Dont worry...Kevin 07 is saddling up to save the day for the Labor govt.
Julia is yesterdays news.

Mmmm, they might do better bringing back Simon Crean to the leadership.
But I suspect this latest debacle has a few more days to run in conjunction with the tent embassy debacle.
Both of these will be in the tabloids for another week or more before she becomes yesterdays news.
The sharks are circling.

Back to top

"Another boat, another policy failure from the Howard government"

Julia Gillard
Shadow Health Minister
2003.

IP Logged

chicken_lipsforme

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7090
Townsville NQ
Gender: male

Re: Tut tut Gillard acceptance speech
Reply #69 - Feb 15^th, 2012 at 8:56am

adelcrow wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 5:52pm:

Maqqa wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 5:49pm:

adelcrow wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 5:47pm:

Maqqa wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 5:45pm:

adelcrow wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 3:59pm:

With the Greens in control of a hostile Senate Abbott would have had to impliment a carbon pollution solution that pleased the Greens just as Julia had to.
I suppose that means that Abbott would have had to change policies to keep power just as Julia did or call a DD and end up with even more Greens in the Senate Grin

Its called "Get the F#(K out of my way or I'll call a double dissolution on you!" policy

I dare Bob Brown to vote against it - MAKE MY DAY!

Yep..people that vote Green will change their mind and vote for the coalition come a DD Grin

Green voters just looooove Abbott Grin

See - even you acknowledge the Greens will lose votes

yep..thats what I was saying ;
but first Abbott has to beat Rudd at the next election Grin

Oppositions don't win elections, governments lose them.
And Labor will stand on it's record at the next election, and it will make no diffference to the outcome whether it's KRudd or Juliar at the helm.

Back to top

"Another boat, another policy failure from the Howard government"

Julia Gillard
Shadow Health Minister
2003.

IP Logged

adelcrow

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20133
everywhere
Gender: male

Re: Tut tut Gillard acceptance speech
Reply #70 - Feb 15^th, 2012 at 9:00am

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Feb 15^th, 2012 at 8:56am:

adelcrow wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 5:52pm:

Maqqa wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 5:49pm:

adelcrow wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 5:47pm:

Maqqa wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 5:45pm:

adelcrow wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 3:59pm:

With the Greens in control of a hostile Senate Abbott would have had to impliment a carbon pollution solution that pleased the Greens just as Julia had to.
I suppose that means that Abbott would have had to change policies to keep power just as Julia did or call a DD and end up with even more Greens in the Senate Grin

Its called "Get the F#(K out of my way or I'll call a double dissolution on you!" policy

I dare Bob Brown to vote against it - MAKE MY DAY!

Yep..people that vote Green will change their mind and vote for the coalition come a DD Grin

Green voters just looooove Abbott Grin

See - even you acknowledge the Greens will lose votes

yep..thats what I was saying ;
but first Abbott has to beat Rudd at the next election Grin

Oppositions don't win elections, governments lose them.
And Labor will stand on it's record at the next election, and it will make no diffference to the outcome whether it's KRudd or Juliar at the helm.

Lets see what happens when the Abbott starts releasing policies and costings.
Until then all we have is his unprofessional behaviour to go on.

Back to top

Go the Bunnies

IP Logged

chicken_lipsforme

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7090
Townsville NQ
Gender: male

Re: Tut tut Gillard acceptance speech
Reply #71 - Feb 15^th, 2012 at 9:02am

adelcrow wrote on Feb 15^th, 2012 at 9:00am:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Feb 15^th, 2012 at 8:56am:

adelcrow wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 5:52pm:

Maqqa wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 5:49pm:

adelcrow wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 5:47pm:

Maqqa wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 5:45pm:

adelcrow wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 3:59pm:

With the Greens in control of a hostile Senate Abbott would have had to impliment a carbon pollution solution that pleased the Greens just as Julia had to.
I suppose that means that Abbott would have had to change policies to keep power just as Julia did or call a DD and end up with even more Greens in the Senate Grin

Its called "Get the F#(K out of my way or I'll call a double dissolution on you!" policy

I dare Bob Brown to vote against it - MAKE MY DAY!

Yep..people that vote Green will change their mind and vote for the coalition come a DD Grin

Green voters just looooove Abbott Grin

See - even you acknowledge the Greens will lose votes

yep..thats what I was saying ;
but first Abbott has to beat Rudd at the next election Grin

Oppositions don't win elections, governments lose them.
And Labor will stand on it's record at the next election, and it will make no diffference to the outcome whether it's KRudd or Juliar at the helm.

Lets see what happens when the Abbott starts releasing policies and costings.
Until then all we have is his unprofessional behaviour to go on.

Balanced against 5 years of Labor incompetence, waste, mismanagement and lies.
Puts things in perspective eh.

Back to top

"Another boat, another policy failure from the Howard government"

Julia Gillard
Shadow Health Minister
2003.

IP Logged

adelcrow

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20133
everywhere
Gender: male

Re: Tut tut Gillard acceptance speech
Reply #72 - Feb 15^th, 2012 at 9:06am

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Feb 15^th, 2012 at 9:02am:

adelcrow wrote on Feb 15^th, 2012 at 9:00am:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Feb 15^th, 2012 at 8:56am:

adelcrow wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 5:52pm:

Maqqa wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 5:49pm:

adelcrow wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 5:47pm:

Maqqa wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 5:45pm:

adelcrow wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 3:59pm:

With the Greens in control of a hostile Senate Abbott would have had to impliment a carbon pollution solution that pleased the Greens just as Julia had to.
I suppose that means that Abbott would have had to change policies to keep power just as Julia did or call a DD and end up with even more Greens in the Senate Grin

Its called "Get the F#(K out of my way or I'll call a double dissolution on you!" policy

I dare Bob Brown to vote against it - MAKE MY DAY!

Yep..people that vote Green will change their mind and vote for the coalition come a DD Grin

Green voters just looooove Abbott Grin

See - even you acknowledge the Greens will lose votes

yep..thats what I was saying ;
but first Abbott has to beat Rudd at the next election Grin

Oppositions don't win elections, governments lose them.
And Labor will stand on it's record at the next election, and it will make no diffference to the outcome whether it's KRudd or Juliar at the helm.

Lets see what happens when the Abbott starts releasing policies and costings.
Until then all we have is his unprofessional behaviour to go on.

Balanced against 5 years of Labor incompetence, waste, mismanagement and lies.
Puts things in perspective eh.

At least Labor didnt invade another country based on lies or create a multi billion dollar pollie superannuation slush fund in that 5 yrs.

Back to top

Go the Bunnies

IP Logged

Maqqa

Gold Member

Offline

14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000

Re: Tut tut Gillard acceptance speech
Reply #73 - Feb 15^th, 2012 at 9:09am

adelcrow wrote on Feb 15^th, 2012 at 9:00am:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Feb 15^th, 2012 at 8:56am:

adelcrow wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 5:52pm:

Maqqa wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 5:49pm:

adelcrow wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 5:47pm:

Maqqa wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 5:45pm:

adelcrow wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 3:59pm:

With the Greens in control of a hostile Senate Abbott would have had to impliment a carbon pollution solution that pleased the Greens just as Julia had to.
I suppose that means that Abbott would have had to change policies to keep power just as Julia did or call a DD and end up with even more Greens in the Senate Grin

Its called "Get the F#(K out of my way or I'll call a double dissolution on you!" policy

I dare Bob Brown to vote against it - MAKE MY DAY!

Yep..people that vote Green will change their mind and vote for the coalition come a DD Grin

Green voters just looooove Abbott Grin

See - even you acknowledge the Greens will lose votes

yep..thats what I was saying ;
but first Abbott has to beat Rudd at the next election Grin

Oppositions don't win elections, governments lose them.
And Labor will stand on it's record at the next election, and it will make no diffference to the outcome whether it's KRudd or Juliar at the helm.

Lets see what happens when the Abbott starts releasing policies and costings.
Until then all we have is his unprofessional behaviour to go on.

Like Labor's broadband that jumped from $4.7B to $36B?

Or the $21B per year Labor surplus they promised for the last 5 years?

That's about $140B - Laborites accepted that mistake happily so as long as we stay below $139.99B we'll be better than the ALP

Back to top

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number

IP Logged

adelcrow

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20133
everywhere
Gender: male

Re: Tut tut Gillard acceptance speech
Reply #74 - Feb 15^th, 2012 at 9:17am

Maqqa wrote on Feb 15^th, 2012 at 9:09am:

adelcrow wrote on Feb 15^th, 2012 at 9:00am:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Feb 15^th, 2012 at 8:56am:

adelcrow wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 5:52pm:

Maqqa wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 5:49pm:

adelcrow wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 5:47pm:

Maqqa wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 5:45pm:

adelcrow wrote on Feb 14^th, 2012 at 3:59pm:

With the Greens in control of a hostile Senate Abbott would have had to impliment a carbon pollution solution that pleased the Greens just as Julia had to.
I suppose that means that Abbott would have had to change policies to keep power just as Julia did or call a DD and end up with even more Greens in the Senate Grin

Its called "Get the F#(K out of my way or I'll call a double dissolution on you!" policy

I dare Bob Brown to vote against it - MAKE MY DAY!

Yep..people that vote Green will change their mind and vote for the coalition come a DD Grin

Green voters just looooove Abbott Grin

See - even you acknowledge the Greens will lose votes

yep..thats what I was saying ;
but first Abbott has to beat Rudd at the next election Grin

Oppositions don't win elections, governments lose them.
And Labor will stand on it's record at the next election, and it will make no diffference to the outcome whether it's KRudd or Juliar at the helm.

Lets see what happens when the Abbott starts releasing policies and costings.
Until then all we have is his unprofessional behaviour to go on.

Like Labor's broadband that jumped from $4.7B to $36B?

Or the $21B per year Labor surplus they promised for the last 5 years?

That's about $140B - Laborites accepted that mistake happily so as long as we stay below $139.99B we'll be better than the ALP

It costs money to make up for all the infustructure and training investment that Howard pulled from the budget. He was more concerned with filling the pollies superannuation slush fund with tens of billions of taxpayers dollars and getting the middle class and favoured businesses addicted to his welfare splurge.
Im sure Maqqa also remembers that hundreds of billions of dollars was wiped off our economy by the GFC. And remember who was in power while the borrow like theres no tomorrow mentality which bought about the GFC was at its height..Howard, Blair and Bush.

Back to top

Go the Bunnies

IP Logged