Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
'Honour' killings (Read 4474 times)
...
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male
Re: 'Honour' killings
Reply #15 - Feb 7th, 2012 at 1:15pm
 
Grey wrote on Feb 7th, 2012 at 1:12pm:
... wrote on Feb 7th, 2012 at 1:06pm:
Quote:
How many more children have to die while the priests and vicars beat up the 'sanctity of marriage'?



Please explaaaaaain?

Huh


Well it's not hard to work out Honky. I'd rather you applied yourself to working this out on your own.



Well what I took from it was that you think marriage leads to child murder.  Having a childs father in the house leads to an increased risk of that child being killed?

Am I on the right track?
Back to top
 

In the fullness of time...
 
IP Logged
 
falah
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3162
Re: 'Honour' killings
Reply #16 - Feb 7th, 2012 at 1:22pm
 
Annie Anthrax wrote on Feb 7th, 2012 at 1:06pm:
I know they're haram and you know they're haram, but there are plenty of Muslims who believe that it is halal to force their daughters into marriage or mutilate them. A lot of these people wouldn't be able to read the Quran for themselves - it is important for the Imams to speak out louder.


Nice idea in theory, except that the US-backed puppet regimes have been spending decades silencing imams.

For example, the Saudi sheikh I quoted giving the fatwa against honour killings has been banned from giving fatwas by the Saudi government due to pressure from the US.
Back to top
 

Nothing is worthy of worship except God Almighty - our Creator!
 
IP Logged
 
Baronvonrort
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 19159
Gender: male
Re: 'Honour' killings
Reply #17 - Feb 7th, 2012 at 1:27pm
 
falah wrote on Feb 7th, 2012 at 12:49pm:
''There is no justification for honour killings, domestic violence and misogyny in Islam,'' said the religious order issued by the Islamic Supreme Council of Canada and signed by 34 imams from Canada and the US.


If the woman starts dating a non muslim man then she is considered an apostate because that is haram in Islam.

The death penalty for apostasy is probably used to justify this killing in the name of honour.

Not many men are the victims of homour killings are they falah?

Quran 4:34 is the wife beating verse that allah the most mercifull revealed to help keep 4 wives in line.
How do you think muslim men keep 4 wives in line?
Does this verse encourage wife beating?
http://quran.com/4/34
Read all translations by ticking boxes on left side of page.
Back to top
 

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.
 
IP Logged
 
...
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male
Re: 'Honour' killings
Reply #18 - Feb 7th, 2012 at 1:34pm
 
Well grey, assuming I did read it correctly....

The opposite is true.

Fathers killing their biological children is a rarity.  STEP-fathers killing their STEP children isn't so rare.

Quote:
The Cinderella effect is a term used by psychologists to describe the high incidence of stepchildren being physically abused, emotionally abused, sexually abused, neglected, murdered, or otherwise mistreated at the hands of their stepparents at significantly higher rates than at the hands of their genetic parents. It takes its name from the fairy tale character Cinderella, who in the story was cruelly mistreated by her stepmother and stepsisters.

The effect has been called "one of the poster-children of evolutionary psychology."[1]


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinderella_effect

So if "the sanctity of marriage" were respected, there'd be fewer "step-relationships" and thus, fewer child murders.

And what about women?

Quote:
"How could she?"

It's the headline du jour whenever a horrific case emerges of a mother killing her kids, as Lashanda Armstrong did when she piled her children into her minivan and drove straight into the frigid Hudson River.

Our shock at such stories is, of course, understandable: They seem to go against everything we intuitively feel about the mother-child bond.

But mothers kill their children in this country much more often than most people would realize by simply reading the headlines; by conservative estimates it happens every few days, at least 100 times a year. Experts say more mothers than fathers kill their children under 5 years of age. And some say our reluctance as a society to believe mothers would be capable of killing their offspring is hindering our ability to recognize warning signs, intervene and prevent more tragedies.

And so the problem remains.


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42634832/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/

But WHY do they do it?  The reasons given are usually depression, isolation, being unable to cope.....

You'd have to wonder if these feelings would be as prevalent if women were not encouraged to be single parents - to be told they "doan need no man" to "have it all."  Sometimes we need help, even if it is from a *gasp* man. 

Negative consequnces arising from leftist ideology.  Who woulda thunk it?
Back to top
 

In the fullness of time...
 
IP Logged
 
Annie Anthrax
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Take the plan, spin it
sideways

Posts: 7057
Gender: female
Re: 'Honour' killings
Reply #19 - Feb 7th, 2012 at 1:51pm
 
falah wrote on Feb 7th, 2012 at 1:22pm:
Annie Anthrax wrote on Feb 7th, 2012 at 1:06pm:
I know they're haram and you know they're haram, but there are plenty of Muslims who believe that it is halal to force their daughters into marriage or mutilate them. A lot of these people wouldn't be able to read the Quran for themselves - it is important for the Imams to speak out louder.


Nice idea in theory, except that the US-backed puppet regimes have been spending decades silencing imams.

For example, the Saudi sheikh I quoted giving the fatwa against honour killings has been banned from giving fatwas by the Saudi government due to pressure from the US.



Well, things are changing and, by the looks of it, for the better. The MB in Egypt would have to be against honour killings and FGM, I would think. Not so sure about those Salafis.


How does that Saudi sheikh feel about women driving or being forced to wear niqab?
Back to top
 

I can't do this, but I'm doing it anyway.
 
IP Logged
 
Baronvonrort
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 19159
Gender: male
Re: 'Honour' killings
Reply #20 - Feb 7th, 2012 at 2:09pm
 
Annie Anthrax wrote on Feb 7th, 2012 at 1:51pm:
Well, things are changing and, by the looks of it, for the better. The MB in Egypt would have to be against honour killings and FGM, I would think. Not so sure about those Salafis.



Are these the same people that call FGM a "ritual nick"?

I think porcine animals will become aerodynamic before women get rights in the Islamic world.

http://english.alarabiya.net/articles/2012/01/24/190304.html
Back to top
 

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.
 
IP Logged
 
Annie Anthrax
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Take the plan, spin it
sideways

Posts: 7057
Gender: female
Re: 'Honour' killings
Reply #21 - Feb 7th, 2012 at 2:16pm
 
Quote:
If you want to understand the Islamic forces that are gaining strength in Egypt and scaring people here and abroad, let me tell you about my dinner in the home of Muslim Brotherhood activists.

First, meet my hostess: Sondos Asem, a 24-year-old woman who is pretty much the opposite of the stereotypical bearded Brotherhood activist. Sondos is a middle-class graduate of the American University in Cairo, where I studied in the early 1980s (“that’s before I was born,” she said wonderingly, making me feel particularly decrepit).

She speaks perfect English, is writing a master’s thesis on social media, and helps run the Brotherhood’s English-language Twitter feed, @Ikhwanweb.

The Muslim Brotherhood has emerged as the dominant political party in parliamentary voting because of people like Sondos and her family. My interviews with supporters suggest that the Brotherhood is far more complex than the caricature that scares many Americans.

Sondos rails at the Western presumption that the Muslim Brotherhood would oppress women. She notes that her own mother, Manal Abul Hassan, is one of many female Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated candidates running for Parliament.


“It’s a big misconception that the Muslim Brotherhood marginalizes women,” Sondos said. “Fifty percent of the Brotherhood are women.”

I told Sondos that Westerners are fearful partly because they have watched the authorities oppress women in the name of Islam in countries such as Saudi Arabia, Iran and Afghanistan.

“I don’t think Egypt can ever be compared to Saudi Arabia or Iran or Afghanistan,” she replied. “We, as Egyptians, are religiously very moderate.” A much better model for Egypt, she said, is Turkey, where an Islamic party is presiding over an economic boom.

I asked about female circumcision, also called female genital mutilation, which is inflicted on the overwhelming majority of girls in Egypt. It is particularly common in conservative religious households and, to its credit, the Mubarak government made some effort to stop the practice. Many worry that a more democratic government won’t challenge a practice that has broad support.

The Muslim Brotherhood is against the brutal practice of female circumcision,” Sondos said bluntly. She insisted that women over all would benefit from Brotherhood policies that focus on the poor: “We believe that a solution of women’s problems in Egyptian society is to solve the real causes, which are illiteracy, poverty and lack of education.



http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/08/opinion/kristof-joining-a-dinner-in-a-muslim-b...





Positively barbaric. I bet she's a liar, eh?
Back to top
 

I can't do this, but I'm doing it anyway.
 
IP Logged
 
falah
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3162
Re: 'Honour' killings
Reply #22 - Feb 7th, 2012 at 2:38pm
 
Grey wrote on Feb 7th, 2012 at 12:58pm:
falah wrote on Feb 7th, 2012 at 12:20pm:
Grey wrote on Feb 7th, 2012 at 10:54am:
The tragic murder of three young women and their mother in Canada highlights again the Misogyny of Islam.


The murderers were from the small Shi-ite sect, and were not Orthodox Muslims. Some of their victims were from Sunni Orthodox famlies. During the trial their animosity of the Shi-ites towards the Sunni Muslims became clear when the court was told how th ringleader would curse the Sunni victim's father 100's of times (it is part of Shi-ite religion to curse Sunni Muslims)


I don't know where you get that idea Falah. These were all members of the same family, both murderers and murdered.


They may all have been in the same family, but they were not all of the same religion.

Quote:
Further interesting detail: Tooba [second wife] is Shia, as is Shafia [husband], and Rona [first wife] was Sunni. In Afghanistan, the two Muslim sects revile each other yet Tooba asserted this was never an issue for the Shafias.
http://www.thestar.com/mobile/NEWS/article/1112525


In another article, it reported that Sunni Rona was given some of the daughters to raise as her own when Shi-ite Tooba had her hands full with her many children. Presumeably Rona raised her daughters as Sunni too.

In yet another article, it is reported that Shi-ite Shafia cursed Sunni Rona's Sunni father.
Back to top
 

Nothing is worthy of worship except God Almighty - our Creator!
 
IP Logged
 
falah
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3162
Re: 'Honour' killings
Reply #23 - Feb 7th, 2012 at 2:41pm
 
Annie Anthrax wrote on Feb 7th, 2012 at 1:51pm:
Well, things are changing and, by the looks of it, for the better. The MB in Egypt would have to be against honour killings and FGM, I would think. Not so sure about those Salafis.


Do you even know what a salafi is? The fatwa I posted against "honour" killings was from an orthodox Salafi scholar. FGM is not even practiced amongst the native Saudis who mostly follow Orthodox salafi islam.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Feb 7th, 2012 at 3:49pm by falah »  

Nothing is worthy of worship except God Almighty - our Creator!
 
IP Logged
 
Baronvonrort
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 19159
Gender: male
Re: 'Honour' killings
Reply #24 - Feb 7th, 2012 at 4:34pm
 
falah wrote on Feb 7th, 2012 at 2:41pm:
Annie Anthrax wrote on Feb 7th, 2012 at 1:51pm:
Well, things are changing and, by the looks of it, for the better. The MB in Egypt would have to be against honour killings and FGM, I would think. Not so sure about those Salafis.


Do you even know what a salafi is? The fatwa I posted against "honour" killings was from an orthodox Salafi scholar. FGM is not even practiced amongst the native Saudis who mostly follow Orthodox salafi islam.


That is the same scholar who says it is ok to kill apostates for the crime of disbelief in Islam.
http://www.islamqa.com/en/ref/20327/apostate

If a muslimah dates a non muslim man is she considered an apostate?
The death penalty for apostasy allows honour killings!

FGM is a part of Islam-
Quote:
Female circumcision has not been prescribed for no reason,rather the wisdom behind it brings many benefits.

Circumcision reduces excessive sensitivity of the clitoris which may cause it to increase in size,which is very annoying to the husband at the time of intercourse.
http://www.islamqa.com/en/ref/45528/circumcision



Quote:
Circumcision is not an inherited custom as some people claim,rather it is prescribed in Islam and the scholars are unanimously agreed that it is prescribed.
Not a single muslim scholar -as far as we know-has said circumcision is not prescribed.
http://www.islamqa.com/en/ref/60314/circumcision


The sooner this barbaric practice is outlawed the better.

If you think we will allow a "ritual nick" you are mistaken, anyone who does FGM belongs in jail.
Back to top
 

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.
 
IP Logged
 
Annie Anthrax
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Take the plan, spin it
sideways

Posts: 7057
Gender: female
Re: 'Honour' killings
Reply #25 - Feb 7th, 2012 at 5:02pm
 
falah wrote on Feb 7th, 2012 at 2:41pm:
Annie Anthrax wrote on Feb 7th, 2012 at 1:51pm:
Well, things are changing and, by the looks of it, for the better. The MB in Egypt would have to be against honour killings and FGM, I would think. Not so sure about those Salafis.


Do you even know what a salafi is? The fatwa I posted against "honour" killings was from an orthodox Salafi scholar. FGM is not even practiced amongst the native Saudis who mostly follow Orthodox salafi islam.


I didn't say Salafi practice FGM. I said I'm not sure about them and that I prefer the Brotherhood because I feel more comfortable with them.

I saw Salafi leaders in Egypt saying they don't want men and women to share the same beach. How are families supposed to go out and spend time together? It's things like this that make me nervous - the world hardly needs another Taliban-like oppressor of women. Anyway, that said, I have limited knowlede of what Salafi policy in Egypt is, apart from that gained from the one program, but it was enough to make me wary.
Back to top
 

I can't do this, but I'm doing it anyway.
 
IP Logged
 
Grey
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5341
Gender: male
Re: 'Honour' killings
Reply #26 - Feb 7th, 2012 at 5:18pm
 
... wrote on Feb 7th, 2012 at 1:34pm:
Well grey, assuming I did read it correctly....

The opposite is true.

Fathers killing their biological children is a rarity.  STEP-fathers killing their STEP children isn't so rare.

Quote:
The Cinderella effect is a term used by psychologists to describe the high incidence of stepchildren being physically abused, emotionally abused, sexually abused, neglected, murdered, or otherwise mistreated at the hands of their stepparents at significantly higher rates than at the hands of their genetic parents. It takes its name from the fairy tale character Cinderella, who in the story was cruelly mistreated by her stepmother and stepsisters.

The effect has been called "one of the poster-children of evolutionary psychology."[1]


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinderella_effect

So if "the sanctity of marriage" were respected, there'd be fewer "step-relationships" and thus, fewer child murders.

And what about women?

Quote:
"How could she?"

It's the headline du jour whenever a horrific case emerges of a mother killing her kids, as Lashanda Armstrong did when she piled her children into her minivan and drove straight into the frigid Hudson River.

Our shock at such stories is, of course, understandable: They seem to go against everything we intuitively feel about the mother-child bond.

But mothers kill their children in this country much more often than most people would realize by simply reading the headlines; by conservative estimates it happens every few days, at least 100 times a year. Experts say more mothers than fathers kill their children under 5 years of age. And some say our reluctance as a society to believe mothers would be capable of killing their offspring is hindering our ability to recognize warning signs, intervene and prevent more tragedies.

And so the problem remains.


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42634832/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/

But WHY do they do it?  The reasons given are usually depression, isolation, being unable to cope.....

You'd have to wonder if these feelings would be as prevalent if women were not encouraged to be single parents - to be told they "doan need no man" to "have it all."  Sometimes we need help, even if it is from a *gasp* man. 

Negative consequnces arising from leftist ideology.  Who woulda thunk it?


My point was that killing the wife and /or kids when the marriage falls apart is symptomatic of taking marriage too seriously. But on the face of it your points are fair and  taken. 
Back to top
 

"It is in the shelter of each other that the people live" - Irish Proverb
 
IP Logged
 
falah
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3162
Re: 'Honour' killings
Reply #27 - Feb 7th, 2012 at 6:10pm
 
Baronvonrort wrote on Feb 7th, 2012 at 4:34pm:
If a muslimah dates a non muslim man is she considered an apostate?

Of course not.





Baronvonrort wrote on Feb 7th, 2012 at 4:34pm:
Quote:
Female circumcision has not been prescribed for no reason,rather the wisdom behind it brings many benefits.

Circumcision reduces excessive sensitivity of the clitoris which may cause it to increase in size,which is very annoying to the husband at the time of intercourse.
http://www.islamqa.com/en/ref/45528/circumcision


In the same fatwa he says:

"The correct view is that circumcision is obligatory for males and that it is one of the symbols of Islam, and that circumcision of women is...not obligatory."






Baronvonrort wrote on Feb 7th, 2012 at 4:34pm:
Quote:
Circumcision is not an inherited custom as some people claim,rather it is prescribed in Islam and the scholars are unanimously agreed that it is prescribed.
Not a single muslim scholar -as far as we know-has said circumcision is not prescribed.
http://www.islamqa.com/en/ref/60314/circumcision


The permissable, but not obligaotry, procedure being talked about here is not FGM, but rather the circumcision in females that is simliar to that of the males - cutting the hood or the covering of the glans, whether it be the that which surrounds the penile glans or the clitoral glans.

The actual organ is to be left intact and fully functional, and no harm is done to the person.

Quote:
Ibn al-Sabbaagh said in al-Shaamil: What is obligatory in the case of a man is to cut the skin on the tip of the penis until the entire glans becomes visible. In the case of a woman, it means cutting the skin that looks like the comb of a rooster at the top of the vagina (clitoral hood), between the two labia; if it is cut the base of it (the clitoris) should be left like a date pit. 

Al-Nawawi said:

The well-known correct view is that everything covering the (clitoral or penile) glans must be cut.

Al-Majmoo’, 1/351

Al-Juwayni said: 

The hadeeth indicates that not too much of it should be removed (in the case of women), because he said, “Leave something sticking out and do not go to extremes in cutting.”
http://www.islamqa.com/en/ref/9412




This differs from FGM practiced in Africa, where all external genitalia is removed and sewn closed. This FGM practiced in Africa is referred to as Pharonic Cricumcision, and is practiced by Christians and Muslims alike.

The African Pharonic excision of all external genitalia, has no basis in Islam.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Feb 7th, 2012 at 6:40pm by falah »  

Nothing is worthy of worship except God Almighty - our Creator!
 
IP Logged
 
Annie Anthrax
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Take the plan, spin it
sideways

Posts: 7057
Gender: female
Re: 'Honour' killings
Reply #28 - Feb 7th, 2012 at 6:14pm
 
Quote:
Circumcision reduces excessive sensitivity of the clitoris which may cause it to increase in size,which is very annoying to the husband at the time of intercourse.


Funnily enough, the same things happens to a penis. Let's cut those off too.
Back to top
 

I can't do this, but I'm doing it anyway.
 
IP Logged
 
falah
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3162
Re: 'Honour' killings
Reply #29 - Feb 7th, 2012 at 6:46pm
 
Annie Anthrax wrote on Feb 7th, 2012 at 6:14pm:
Quote:
Circumcision reduces excessive sensitivity of the clitoris which may cause it to increase in size,which is very annoying to the husband at the time of intercourse.


Funnily enough, the same things happens to a penis. Let's cut those off too.


The equivalent is done to men in Jewish and Islamic rites eg. removal of the superfluous skin covering the glans.
Back to top
 

Nothing is worthy of worship except God Almighty - our Creator!
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print