|
muso
|
chicken_lipsforme wrote on Feb 7 th, 2012 at 2:18pm: muso wrote on Feb 7 th, 2012 at 9:24am: matty wrote on Feb 7 th, 2012 at 6:26am: Why are people still peddling this obvious hoax, scare campaign, and blatant lie of global warming? Studies show that it holds no basis in fact whatsoever, and it's also interesting to note that the name was originally the very specific 'global warming', but now has gone to the very generic and broad 'climate change'. Tim Flannery and Ross Garnaut predicted that rain would be a thing of the past. The climate would reach unrelenting and unbearable high temperatues. Well, we've all seen what's happened, haven't we? People freezing to death in Europe with unbearable cold temperatures, and floodings of dams all over the world. Let's look a little closer to home. Australia had its coldest start to summer this year, since 1960. Temperatures have been consistently cold everywhere this summer, except for Darwin, which is always hot anyway. But even there, Darwin had its cloldest July in 50 years last year, as did Sydney. Of course, one need only look at parts of Queensland and Northern New South Wales. WHERE IS MR FLANNERY AND WHERE IS MR GARNAUT? COME ON, OVER HERE AND EXPLAIN YOURSELF!!!!
Global warming is a hoax targeted at the weak, the fearful, the naive, and the downright stupid. Damn!, so John Howard, Malcolm Turnbull and Margaret Thatcher - not to mention Roger Scruton, are among the perpetrators of this hoax, together with every Academy of Sciences in the world? Seems a little far fetched to say that it's a hoax. All very eminent scientists to be sure.  A thousand politicians lined up nodding their heads doesn't make it so. Good point, so by implication, do you agree that Christopher Monckton and Andrew Bolt, as journos are totally irrelevant and we just need to talk about the science? A thousand journos nodding their heads doesn't make it so either. By the way, I think you'll find that scientists outnumber politicians by several magnitudes in my last sentence, including Margaret Thatcher of course, as she was a qualified scientist. I just got the impression that you were interested in the opinions of lay persons and fake aristocracy. Let me go further than that. In science, personal opinions don't count for anything. What counts is the evidence - the validity of the argument. It doesn't matter if it's the Dalai Lama or the Pope who has an opinion. Everybody has an opinion, they are all different and they all stink. (a bit like something else)
|