Australian Politics Forum - Remember Monkton televised debate with Dr. Denniss

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Remember Monkton televised debate with Dr. Denniss
Reply #90 - Feb 7^th, 2012 at 11:09am

philperth2010 wrote on Feb 7^th, 2012 at 10:56am:

progressiveslol wrote on Feb 7^th, 2012 at 10:40am:

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 7^th, 2012 at 10:39am:

philperth2010 wrote on Feb 7^th, 2012 at 10:31am:

Why are Tony Abbott and the Coalition going to spend billions on Climate Change if it is not real....We should be debating the merits of each policy not whether a few people whom refuse to submit any evidence to peer review dispute the science....As I have previously said if their is evidence to dispute Climate Change then these people have an obligation to submit their findings for peer review and have them published....Failing to do this affords them no credibility and shows them up for the charlatans they are!!!

There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the latter ignorance.
Hippocrates (460 BC - 377 BC), Law

There in lies the rub. These so called expert skeptics never have any of their own research data and findings to offer. People like Andrew Bolt spend all of their time googling the contrary arguments and presenting it as their own Sad

Hate to break it to you, but it is our own.

If there is any credibility to the claims the AGW is a hoax then these scientists should be able to provided their findings for peer review and scrutiny to support their findings.....I have no problem with AGW being disproved however the evidence needs to be subjected to scientific review or it is worthless....Tell me why these findings that AGW is not happening have never been proven and published in any scientific publication???

Is this what you were after.

http://www.c3headlines.com/peer-reviewed-studies/

Back to top

IP Logged

Doctor Jolly Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 3808	Re: Remember Monkton televised debate with Dr. Denniss Reply #91 - Feb 7^th, 2012 at 11:24am C3 = Climate Conservative Consumer. Ha ha. Are you trying to merge this thread with the "Conservative and racist beliefs linked to low IQ (Read 1159 times)" one ?
Back to top	IP Logged

philperth2010

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21097
Perth
Gender: male

Re: Remember Monkton televised debate with Dr. Denniss
Reply #92 - Feb 7^th, 2012 at 11:26am

progressiveslol wrote on Feb 7^th, 2012 at 11:09am:

philperth2010 wrote on Feb 7^th, 2012 at 10:56am:

progressiveslol wrote on Feb 7^th, 2012 at 10:40am:

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 7^th, 2012 at 10:39am:

philperth2010 wrote on Feb 7^th, 2012 at 10:31am:

Why are Tony Abbott and the Coalition going to spend billions on Climate Change if it is not real....We should be debating the merits of each policy not whether a few people whom refuse to submit any evidence to peer review dispute the science....As I have previously said if their is evidence to dispute Climate Change then these people have an obligation to submit their findings for peer review and have them published....Failing to do this affords them no credibility and shows them up for the charlatans they are!!!

There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the latter ignorance.
Hippocrates (460 BC - 377 BC), Law

There in lies the rub. These so called expert skeptics never have any of their own research data and findings to offer. People like Andrew Bolt spend all of their time googling the contrary arguments and presenting it as their own Sad

Hate to break it to you, but it is our own.

If there is any credibility to the claims the AGW is a hoax then these scientists should be able to provided their findings for peer review and scrutiny to support their findings.....I have no problem with AGW being disproved however the evidence needs to be subjected to scientific review or it is worthless....Tell me why these findings that AGW is not happening have never been proven and published in any scientific publication???

Is this what you were after.

http://www.c3headlines.com/peer-reviewed-studies/

A discredited site that peer reviews itself.....This site has been widely used by deniers and has been shown to use dubious science and lies to substantiate its claims.....It has not had any of its claims published in any scientific journal with any merit!!!

http://thesnufkin.blogspot.com.au/2011/03/how-to-cook-data-set.html

Back to top

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)

IP Logged

progressiveslol Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 17029	Re: Remember Monkton televised debate with Dr. Denniss Reply #93 - Feb 7^th, 2012 at 11:28am Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 7^th, 2012 at 11:24am: C3 = Climate Conservative Consumer. Ha ha. Are you trying to merge this thread with the "Conservative and racist beliefs linked to low IQ (Read 1159 times)" one ? Oh sorry, I thought climate science was important to you.
Back to top	IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Remember Monkton televised debate with Dr. Denniss
Reply #94 - Feb 7^th, 2012 at 11:30am

philperth2010 wrote on Feb 7^th, 2012 at 11:26am:

progressiveslol wrote on Feb 7^th, 2012 at 11:09am:

philperth2010 wrote on Feb 7^th, 2012 at 10:56am:

progressiveslol wrote on Feb 7^th, 2012 at 10:40am:

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 7^th, 2012 at 10:39am:

philperth2010 wrote on Feb 7^th, 2012 at 10:31am:

Why are Tony Abbott and the Coalition going to spend billions on Climate Change if it is not real....We should be debating the merits of each policy not whether a few people whom refuse to submit any evidence to peer review dispute the science....As I have previously said if their is evidence to dispute Climate Change then these people have an obligation to submit their findings for peer review and have them published....Failing to do this affords them no credibility and shows them up for the charlatans they are!!!

There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the latter ignorance.
Hippocrates (460 BC - 377 BC), Law

There in lies the rub. These so called expert skeptics never have any of their own research data and findings to offer. People like Andrew Bolt spend all of their time googling the contrary arguments and presenting it as their own Sad

Hate to break it to you, but it is our own.

If there is any credibility to the claims the AGW is a hoax then these scientists should be able to provided their findings for peer review and scrutiny to support their findings.....I have no problem with AGW being disproved however the evidence needs to be subjected to scientific review or it is worthless....Tell me why these findings that AGW is not happening have never been proven and published in any scientific publication???

Is this what you were after.

http://www.c3headlines.com/peer-reviewed-studies/

A discredited site that peer reviews itself.....This site has been widely used by deniers and has been shown to use dubious science and lies to substantiate its claims.....It has not had any of its claims published in any scientific journal with any merit!!!

http://thesnufkin.blogspot.com.au/2011/03/how-to-cook-data-set.html

Oh, yet another climate church freak who thinks their science is the only science, while spitting the dummy that people dont take the church of climatology seriously.

Well I guess it is all lost on you guys and good. Its fun to watch you squirm.

It was so obvious that when you asked for peer review, you would say it was not real. lol talk about losers.

Back to top

IP Logged

Doctor Jolly

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3808

Re: Remember Monkton televised debate with Dr. Denniss
Reply #95 - Feb 7^th, 2012 at 11:37am

progressiveslol wrote on Feb 7^th, 2012 at 11:28am:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 7^th, 2012 at 11:24am:

C3 = Climate Conservative Consumer.

Ha ha.
Grin

Are you trying to merge this thread with the "Conservative and racist beliefs linked to low IQ (Read 1159 times)" one ?

Oh sorry, I thought climate science was important to you.

Very important. But this thread isnt about climate science, its about (Not a) Lord Monckton isnt it ?

Back to top

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Remember Monkton televised debate with Dr. Denniss
Reply #96 - Feb 7^th, 2012 at 11:41am

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 7^th, 2012 at 11:37am:

progressiveslol wrote on Feb 7^th, 2012 at 11:28am:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 7^th, 2012 at 11:24am:

C3 = Climate Conservative Consumer.

Ha ha.
Grin

Are you trying to merge this thread with the "Conservative and racist beliefs linked to low IQ (Read 1159 times)" one ?

Oh sorry, I thought climate science was important to you.

Very important. But this thread isnt about climate science, its about (Not a) Lord Monckton isnt it ?

Well how about you keep up. It was asked that peer reviews were needed.

Your little excuse does nothing for your throwing out of peer reviewed science. Anything you complain about in terms of people ignoring your climate church can be taken as BS on your part.

Back to top

IP Logged

philperth2010 Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21097 Perth Gender:	Re: Remember Monkton televised debate with Dr. Denniss Reply #97 - Feb 7^th, 2012 at 11:42am Here is what NASA has published..... http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/ http://climate.nasa.gov/keyIndicators/ http://digitaljournal.com/article/300598
Back to top	If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them. Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992) IP Logged

progressiveslol Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 17029	Re: Remember Monkton televised debate with Dr. Denniss Reply #98 - Feb 7^th, 2012 at 11:46am philperth2010 wrote on Feb 7^th, 2012 at 11:42am: Here is what NASA has published..... http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/ http://climate.nasa.gov/keyIndicators/ http://digitaljournal.com/article/300598 And. You asked for peer reviewed science. I gave it.
Back to top	IP Logged

philperth2010

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21097
Perth
Gender: male

Re: Remember Monkton televised debate with Dr. Denniss
Reply #99 - Feb 7^th, 2012 at 11:48am

progressiveslol wrote on Feb 7^th, 2012 at 11:41am:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 7^th, 2012 at 11:37am:

progressiveslol wrote on Feb 7^th, 2012 at 11:28am:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 7^th, 2012 at 11:24am:

C3 = Climate Conservative Consumer.

Ha ha.
Grin

Are you trying to merge this thread with the "Conservative and racist beliefs linked to low IQ (Read 1159 times)" one ?

Oh sorry, I thought climate science was important to you.

Very important. But this thread isnt about climate science, its about (Not a) Lord Monckton isnt it ?

Well how about you keep up. It was asked that peer reviews were needed.

Your little excuse does nothing for your throwing out of peer reviewed science. Anything you complain about in terms of people ignoring your climate church can be taken as BS on your part.

The site peer reviews itself.....If their claims where credible they would be published in credible scientific journals.....The site is opinion that cherry picks data and has not been peer reviewed by the scientific community because they will not submit their claims for scrutiny to any credible publication.....Ask yourself why that is mate???

Back to top

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Remember Monkton televised debate with Dr. Denniss
Reply #100 - Feb 7^th, 2012 at 11:58am

philperth2010 wrote on Feb 7^th, 2012 at 11:48am:

progressiveslol wrote on Feb 7^th, 2012 at 11:41am:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 7^th, 2012 at 11:37am:

progressiveslol wrote on Feb 7^th, 2012 at 11:28am:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 7^th, 2012 at 11:24am:

C3 = Climate Conservative Consumer.

Ha ha.
Grin

Are you trying to merge this thread with the "Conservative and racist beliefs linked to low IQ (Read 1159 times)" one ?

Oh sorry, I thought climate science was important to you.

Very important. But this thread isnt about climate science, its about (Not a) Lord Monckton isnt it ?

Well how about you keep up. It was asked that peer reviews were needed.

Your little excuse does nothing for your throwing out of peer reviewed science. Anything you complain about in terms of people ignoring your climate church can be taken as BS on your part.

The site peer reviews itself.....If their claims where credible they would be published in credible scientific journals.....The site is opinion that cherry picks data and has not been peer reviewed by the scientific community because they will not submit their claims for scrutiny to any credible publication.....Ask yourself why that is mate???

I can't seem to see a link between the web site to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journal_of_Geophysical_Research

Maybe you can point it out seeing as you are making such claims as you are.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Feb 7^th, 2012 at 12:03pm by progressiveslol »

IP Logged

progressiveslol Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 17029	Re: Remember Monkton televised debate with Dr. Denniss Reply #101 - Feb 7^th, 2012 at 11:59am Can't find a link between the website and to this either. http://www.springer.com/earth+sciences+and+geography/geology/journal/12594
Back to top	IP Logged

muso Gold Member Offline Posts: 13151 Gladstone, Queensland Gender:	Re: Remember Monkton televised debate with Dr. Denniss Reply #102 - Feb 7^th, 2012 at 12:01pm Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 7^th, 2012 at 11:37am: Very important. But this thread isnt about climate science, its about (Not a) Lord Monckton isnt it ? Sounds better when you read it out loud.
Back to top	1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not IP Logged

progressiveslol Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 17029	Re: Remember Monkton televised debate with Dr. Denniss Reply #103 - Feb 7^th, 2012 at 12:02pm Or this one. http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2011/2011PA002130.shtml That is 3 from 3. I will look no further and wait for you to bring other more relevant information to your statements.
Back to top	IP Logged

philperth2010 Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21097 Perth Gender:	Re: Remember Monkton televised debate with Dr. Denniss Reply #104 - Feb 7^th, 2012 at 12:09pm philperth2010 wrote on Feb 7^th, 2012 at 11:42am: Here is what NASA has published..... http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/ http://climate.nasa.gov/keyIndicators/ http://digitaljournal.com/article/300598 NASA!!! If you want the truth go to a reputable site!!!
Back to top	If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them. Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992) IP Logged