Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Quit UK Referendum To be held In Scotland (Read 2053 times)
athos
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Re-educate barbarians

Posts: 6421
Hong Kong
Gender: male
Re: Quit UK Referendum To be held In Scotland
Reply #15 - Feb 5th, 2012 at 2:31pm
 
falah wrote on Feb 5th, 2012 at 1:01am:
gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 4th, 2012 at 11:20pm:
Pardon???
Australian Flag, Australian Army, Australian Prime Minister....

The Australian flag was not the official flag at the time of Federation. In fact the current flag was only  formalised as such on 14 February 1954 when the head of state, Queen Elizabeth II, gave Royal Assent to the Flags Act 1953.



As for the army, the colonial forces were not unified until after Federation. The different units remained under states/colony until the Federal Government passed the  Defence Act of 1903. These forces were not allowed to serve overseas.

The AIF was formed in 1914. Australian soldiers remained under British command, and were considered fairly expendable as the mission to Galipolli demonstrates (Australian troops were also poorly equipped and supplied by the British). Australian soldiers served under the British flag.



It was not until John Curtin's government that Australia showed any independence from Britain, when Curtin diverted troops from being sent to fight Nazis to instead defend Australia from the Japanese (the British had abandoned Australia, Singapore and Malaya to the Japanese)


Absolutely right.
At Galipoli Australian young solders were sacrificed for the interest of British empire, like in Africa and so on.
There are much more reasons to celebrate battle for Darwin, when Australia defended itself from Japanese invasion, than, in vain, tragic slaughter of young Aussie lives for someone's else interest.

The problem with people like frances and John Howard is that they desperately want to present themselves as Australian nationalists although all facts firmly confirm their British colonial patriotic feelings that probably they are not aware of.

Back to top
« Last Edit: Feb 5th, 2012 at 3:30pm by athos »  

Do we need to be always politically correct.
In the world of universal deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
 
IP Logged
 
falah
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3162
Re: Quit UK Referendum To be held In Scotland
Reply #16 - Feb 5th, 2012 at 4:04pm
 
athos wrote on Feb 5th, 2012 at 2:31pm:
The problem with people like frances and John Howard is that they desperately want to present themselves as Australian nationalists although all facts firmly confirm their British colonial patriotic feelings that probably they are not aware of.



John Howard shared Robert Menzie's belief that Australia was still part of some great British Empire. A belief not shared by the British. The British bemusedly rejected Menzies' attempts to lead the Empire, while they were surprised that Howard would manage to stall attempts at Australian republicanism.
Back to top
 

Nothing is worthy of worship except God Almighty - our Creator!
 
IP Logged
 
GoddyofOz
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Vote 1 for Sex, cause
you're gay if you don't

Posts: 2397
Re: Quit UK Referendum To be held In Scotland
Reply #17 - Feb 5th, 2012 at 4:56pm
 
gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 4th, 2012 at 11:20pm:
falah wrote on Feb 4th, 2012 at 4:49pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 4th, 2012 at 2:12pm:
GoddyofOz wrote on Feb 4th, 2012 at 2:10pm:
Good luck to the Scots, I hope they get their Independence back.

Lets hope Australia follows suit soon afterwards. Not likely withall the Monarchist a*selickers that dominate our politics, as if there is a Monarchist vote to suck up to.


Don't worry Goddy...it'll happen in 1901....you just have to wait...


Except Australia didn't have its own flag, control of its own army, own head of state.

Anyway, Australia has been pretty much colonised by the US since WWII - just look at how many McDonalds there are around the place. Even Peter Garrett has stopped mentioning the US bases in Autralia.


Pardon???
Australian Flag, Australian Army, Australian Prime Minister....


You conveniently leave out that it's called the ROYAL Australian Army. Is there an Australian Royal Family I'm not aware of?
Back to top
 

"A Conservative is a man who just sits and thinks, mostly just sits." - Woodrow Wilson.

True Patriotism is serving your country all the time, and serving your Politicians when they deserve it.
 
IP Logged
 
Frances
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3577
In a Castle in the Hills
Gender: female
Re: Quit UK Referendum To be held In Scotland
Reply #18 - Feb 5th, 2012 at 11:37pm
 
athos wrote on Feb 5th, 2012 at 2:19pm:
You are not answering my questions, rather talking to yourself:
if Australia is not British colony why after John Howard's referendum country didn't chose own monarch?.

The referendum was to choose between being a constitutional monarchy and being a republic.  There was nothing in it about choosing or creating a new royal family.  Do you know anything at all about the referendum?  It doesn't look like it.

And I did answer your half-witted question:Frances wrote on Feb 5th, 2012 at 12:14am:
[The referendum was to choose between Australia being a constitutional monarchy and being a republic.

You really should check your facts before posting this sort of garbage.



athos wrote on Feb 5th, 2012 at 2:31pm:
The problem with people like frances and John Howard is that they desperately want to present themselves as Australian nationalists although all facts firmly confirm their British colonial patriotic feelings that probably they are not aware of.

I will ask you not to use my name in the same sentence as that of John Howard.

I can't for the life of me figure out where you got that crap about " British colonial patriotic feelings" from....
Back to top
 

Sure God created man before woman. But then you always make a rough draft before the final masterpiece.
 
IP Logged
 
Cofgod
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 693
Bolton, Great Britain
Gender: male
Re: Quit UK Referendum To be held In Scotland
Reply #19 - Feb 6th, 2012 at 4:52am
 
GoddyofOz wrote on Feb 4th, 2012 at 2:10pm:
Good luck to the Scots, I hope they get their Independence back.


They shouldn't have given it up in the first place then, should they?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: Quit UK Referendum To be held In Scotland
Reply #20 - Feb 6th, 2012 at 7:10am
 
Cofgod wrote on Feb 6th, 2012 at 4:52am:
GoddyofOz wrote on Feb 4th, 2012 at 2:10pm:
Good luck to the Scots, I hope they get their Independence back.


They shouldn't have given it up in the first place then, should they?


I'm not sure they had much choice at the time...
Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
Frances
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3577
In a Castle in the Hills
Gender: female
Re: Quit UK Referendum To be held In Scotland
Reply #21 - Feb 6th, 2012 at 7:56am
 
Public support for the move does, however, seem to vary quite a bit according to how the question is asked....

Quote:
Support for independence drops by as much as 8 per cent if the SNP’s preferred question is dumped in favour of one backed by pro-Union campaigners, a major new poll has revealed.

The survey, conducted by YouGov, and published yesterday by Conservative donor Lord Ashcroft, showed that 41 per cent of people currently back independence if asked using Alex Salmond’s preferred question.

The First Minister has suggested asking people simply: “Do you agree Scotland should be an independent country?”

But when pollsters asked another group of Scottish residents a different question – “Should Scotland become an independent country or should it remain part of the United Kingdom?” –the numbers backing independence fell to just 33 per cent.

Support for the status quo, meanwhile, rose from 59 per cent under Mr Salmond’s preferred question to 67 per cent under the second option.

The poll also tested a third question with people asked: “Do you agree or disagree that Scotland should be an independent country.” The simple inclusion of the word “disagree” saw support for independence drop by two points to 39 per cent and support for the Union rise by two to 61 per cent, compared to the SNP’s preference.



http://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/scottish_independence_support_falls_8_with...
Back to top
 

Sure God created man before woman. But then you always make a rough draft before the final masterpiece.
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: Quit UK Referendum To be held In Scotland
Reply #22 - Feb 6th, 2012 at 7:58am
 
Frances wrote on Feb 6th, 2012 at 7:56am:
Public support for the move does, however, seem to vary quite a bit according to how the question is asked....

Quote:
Support for independence drops by as much as 8 per cent if the SNP’s preferred question is dumped in favour of one backed by pro-Union campaigners, a major new poll has revealed.

The survey, conducted by YouGov, and published yesterday by Conservative donor Lord Ashcroft, showed that 41 per cent of people currently back independence if asked using Alex Salmond’s preferred question.

The First Minister has suggested asking people simply: “Do you agree Scotland should be an independent country?”

But when pollsters asked another group of Scottish residents a different question – “Should Scotland become an independent country or should it remain part of the United Kingdom?” –the numbers backing independence fell to just 33 per cent.

Support for the status quo, meanwhile, rose from 59 per cent under Mr Salmond’s preferred question to 67 per cent under the second option.

The poll also tested a third question with people asked: “Do you agree or disagree that Scotland should be an independent country.” The simple inclusion of the word “disagree” saw support for independence drop by two points to 39 per cent and support for the Union rise by two to 61 per cent, compared to the SNP’s preference.



http://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/scottish_independence_support_falls_8_with...


Sounds like the Australian Republic polls..
Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Quit UK Referendum To be held In Scotland
Reply #23 - Feb 6th, 2012 at 8:44am
 
gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 6th, 2012 at 7:10am:
Cofgod wrote on Feb 6th, 2012 at 4:52am:
GoddyofOz wrote on Feb 4th, 2012 at 2:10pm:
Good luck to the Scots, I hope they get their Independence back.


They shouldn't have given it up in the first place then, should they?


I'm not sure they had much choice at the time...


Which time? It speaks volumes that at the Union of the crowns in 1603, it was James I and VI (of England and Scotland respectively) but not Elizabeth I and II when the current monarch too the throne. (James was a Scottish king who moved to England to take the throne. )

- but later in the 1707 Act following  the Covenanter debacle and the Jacobite Rebellion, the relationship changed. (Surprise surprise - it was all about religion)

The eventual selling out of Scotland was more concerned with the underhanded dealings of the Scottish aristocracy than anything else.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Such_a_Parcel_of_Rogues_in_a_Nation

The last verse says it all:

Quote:
O would, ere I had seen the day
That Treason thus could sell us,
My auld grey head had lien in clay,
Wi' Bruce and loyal Wallace!
But pith and power, till my last hour,
I'll mak this declaration;
We're bought and sold for English gold-
Such a parcel of rogues in a nation!


With the Scottish National Party now the major party in Scotland, it looks more likely that there will be independence.
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Frances
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3577
In a Castle in the Hills
Gender: female
Re: Quit UK Referendum To be held In Scotland
Reply #24 - Feb 6th, 2012 at 9:13am
 
muso wrote on Feb 6th, 2012 at 8:44am:
It speaks volumes that at the Union of the crowns in 1603, it was James I and VI (of England and Scotland respectively) but not Elizabeth I and II when the current monarch too the throne.


It's not really necessary in Scotland to refer to the current monarch as Elizabeth I and II, as there was no Elizabeth I of Scotland.  She is just simply referred to as Queen Elizabeth north of the border, with items such as Post office boxes bearing the initials ER rather than EIIR as is seen in the rest of the UK.

The only monarch who has presented a problem on this front was Edward VII (Edward VIII would have too had he not abdicated). There was a petition presented to parliament on his accession, in which it was argued that as Scotland never had an Edward VI, it was now free of the monarchy and independent (or something like that - I'm just going off my memory here) but nothing came of it.  The petition (it is bound up into several volumes is in a museum in either Edinburgh or Glasgow now.
Back to top
 

Sure God created man before woman. But then you always make a rough draft before the final masterpiece.
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Quit UK Referendum To be held In Scotland
Reply #25 - Feb 6th, 2012 at 2:26pm
 
Frances wrote on Feb 6th, 2012 at 9:13am:
... with items such as Post office boxes bearing the initials ER rather than EIIR as is seen in the rest of the UK.


I learn something new every day.  I see that I made a mistake in my post. Of course the 1707 Act predated the first Jacobite Rebellion in 1715, but the Covenanters were one of the major factors that led to it, along with the bankruptcy of Scotland following the failure of the Darian Scheme.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Feb 6th, 2012 at 2:35pm by muso »  

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
scotty 1969
Full Member
***
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 135
melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Quit UK Referendum To be held In Scotland
Reply #26 - Feb 7th, 2012 at 8:03am
 
gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 6th, 2012 at 7:10am:
Cofgod wrote on Feb 6th, 2012 at 4:52am:
GoddyofOz wrote on Feb 4th, 2012 at 2:10pm:
Good luck to the Scots, I hope they get their Independence back.


They shouldn't have given it up in the first place then, should they?


I'm not sure they had much choice at the time...



the aristocracy in scotland gave it up... not the people
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frances
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3577
In a Castle in the Hills
Gender: female
Re: Quit UK Referendum To be held In Scotland
Reply #27 - Feb 7th, 2012 at 8:46am
 
There is a very interesting article on the subject of the union and what led up to it, including the collapse of the Darien venture and corruption and bribery by supporters of the union on the BBC website:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/special/politics97/devolution/scotland/briefing/1707.s...

I have quoted a few sections below, that appear relevant to points raised in this discussion, but there is much more information that is worth reading.  Topics covered are:
   
The Nature And Structure Of The Scottish Parliament

Scotland In The Early Eighteenth Century

The Last Parliament of Scotland, 1703-1707

The Alien Act

The Final Session
 
The Articles of Union 

The Treaty Articles

Anti-Unionism And Scottish Public Opinion


Quote:
By the early eighteenth century, Scotland was a kingdom in crisis. Her economy had been severely weakened by a series of major harvest failures beginning in 1695. The `Lean Years' of the 1690s were compounded by the catastrophic failure of the Darien Scheme and the attempt to establish a Scottish imperial outlet, the colony of Caledonia, on the Isthmus of Darien. Deliberately sabotaged by the combined efforts of the English East India Company, the international financial markets at Amsterdam and King William, it is estimated that almost 25% of Scotland's total liquid capital was lost in the Darien venture.

Anglo-Scottish relations were in a similar state of crisis. Increased English political management of Scottish affairs had led to greater criticism. One contemporary commentator observed that Scotland would `be no longer a province to England, or dance attendance at the door of an English court'. The Glencoe Massacre of 1692, sanctioned and implemented by the Crown in tandem with approval by Lowland elites, had intensified Highland-Lowland divisions.

The Revolution Settlement of 1689-90 had led to a more powerful Scottish Parliament. The two most powerful periods of the Scottish Parliament's existence can be defined as 1639-51 and 1689-1707. During the era of Covenanting control, the Scottish Parliament emerged as a mature political and institutional forum and was one of the most powerful assemblies in Europe. Drawing on the Scottish Constitutional Settlement of 1640-41, a programme of constitutional reform was renewed from 1689 onwards. The Scottish Parliament was by no means a `weak' institution when it was abolished in 1707.


Quote:
The Treaty of Union was clearly unpopular among the wider Scottish people. Civil unrest and public disorder took place in several Scottish towns and the threat of widespread civil unrest resulted in the imposition of martial law by the Parliament. George Lockhart of Carnwath, a Jacobite and the only member of the Scottish negotiating team who was not pro-incorporation, noted that `The whole nation appears against the Union'. Sir John Clerk of Penicuik, an ardent pro-unionist and Union negotiator, observed that the treaty was `contrary to the inclinations of at least three-fourths of the Kingdom'.
Public opinion against the Treaty as it passed through the Scottish Parliament was voiced through petitions from the Scottish localities. Anti-union petitions were received from shires, burghs, presbyteries and parishes. The Convention of Royal Burghs also petitioned against the Union and not one petition in favour of an incorporating union was received by Parliament.


Quote:
Many members of the [political group known as the] Squadrone [Volante] had invested heavily in the Darien Scheme and they believed that they would receive compensation for their losses; Article 14, the Eqivalent granted £398 085 10s to Scotland to offset future liability towards the English national debt. In essence, it was also used a means of compensation for investors in Darien.

Bribery and financial persuasion were also prevalent with £20 000 sterling (£240 000 Scots) being despatched to Scotland for distribution by the Earl of Glasgow. James Douglas, 2nd Duke of Queensberry, the Queen's Commissioner in Parliament received £12 325 sterling, the majority of the funding. The bulk of this funding was used in the payment of spies and agent provocateurs.
Back to top
 

Sure God created man before woman. But then you always make a rough draft before the final masterpiece.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print