Australian Politics Forum - Racist Australia

Grey Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 5341 Gender:	Re: Racist Australia Reply #375 - Jan 26^th, 2012 at 6:45pm Quote: You don't give the piantbursh credit for the work of art, it is the hand that wields it. A white hand. Excited in an almost freudian way? That white hand must be working overtime. Honky, raising wank to an art form.
Back to top	"It is in the shelter of each other that the people live" - Irish Proverb IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: Racist Australia
Reply #376 - Jan 26^th, 2012 at 6:47pm

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jan 26^th, 2012 at 6:41pm:

The right answer is they did. Before they were systematically wiped out.

Yes, I know they many died quietly from smallpox and influenza to make way for the superior genepool. But the ones who survived were shot or rounded onto missions, where to speak an Aboriginal language was forbidden.

Hence we use knives and forks and speak English here - not some Abo monkey talk.

I guess that uh...sometimes poo happens.
But again, off on a tangent. I didn't say anything about the nature of the takeover that allowed whitey to come into control of this country. Only that it DID happen. Whitey DID take over, and when they did, they built the nation of Australia, with it's motto:

"By whitey for whitey"

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

... Gold Member Offline Posts: 23673 WA Gender:	Re: Racist Australia Reply #377 - Jan 26^th, 2012 at 6:48pm Grey wrote on Jan 26^th, 2012 at 6:45pm: Quote: You don't give the piantbursh credit for the work of art, it is the hand that wields it. A white hand. Excited in an almost freudian way? That white hand must be working overtime. Honky, raising wank to an art form. Oh. A typo. You got me good grey. Good for you.
Back to top	In the fullness of time... IP Logged

Grey

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 5341
Gender: male

Re: Racist Australia
Reply #378 - Jan 26^th, 2012 at 6:48pm

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jan 26^th, 2012 at 6:41pm:

Honky,

The right answer is they did. Before they were systematically wiped out.

Yes, I know they many died quietly from smallpox and influenza to make way for the superior genepool. But the ones who survived were shot or rounded onto missions, where to speak an Aboriginal language was forbidden.

Hence we use knives and forks and speak English here - not some Abo monkey talk.

It must be said that changing yourself to suit the environment, may yet prove a wiser course than changing the environment to suit you.

Back to top

"It is in the shelter of each other that the people live" - Irish Proverb

IP Logged

barnaby joe Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 1992 euchareena	Re: Racist Australia Reply #379 - Jan 26^th, 2012 at 6:53pm i'm pretty sure abos never explicitly decided to remain as hunter gatherers. it's not like they were playing sid meier's civilisation and just decided to put their research funding slider down to 0% one day after they unlocked the STICK technology. they killed the megafauna, too. bastards.
Back to top	IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: Racist Australia
Reply #380 - Jan 26^th, 2012 at 6:55pm

Grey wrote on Jan 26^th, 2012 at 6:48pm:

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jan 26^th, 2012 at 6:41pm:

Honky,

The right answer is they did. Before they were systematically wiped out.

Yes, I know they many died quietly from smallpox and influenza to make way for the superior genepool. But the ones who survived were shot or rounded onto missions, where to speak an Aboriginal language was forbidden.

Hence we use knives and forks and speak English here - not some Abo monkey talk.

It must be said that changing yourself to suit the environment, may yet prove a wiser course than changing the environment to suit you.

Well of course it is., adapting to the environment is as old as life itself. It's the very basis of evolution.

Even an amoeba knows that.

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

Paki gob on a stick

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 103596

Re: Racist Australia
Reply #381 - Jan 26^th, 2012 at 7:02pm

... wrote on Jan 26^th, 2012 at 6:47pm:

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jan 26^th, 2012 at 6:41pm:

The right answer is they did. Before they were systematically wiped out.

Yes, I know they many died quietly from smallpox and influenza to make way for the superior genepool. But the ones who survived were shot or rounded onto missions, where to speak an Aboriginal language was forbidden.

Hence we use knives and forks and speak English here - not some Abo monkey talk.

I guess that uh...sometimes poo happens.
But again, off on a tangent. I didn't say anything about the nature of the takeover that allowed whitey to come into control of this country. Only that it DID happen. Whitey DID take over, and when they did, they built the nation of Australia, with it's motto:

"By whitey for whitey"

Again, Honky, you're mistaken. Phillip's orders were to make friends with the local natives and create a society WITH them. And Phillip did this, taking Aboriginals into his household in Sydney. When he went home, he befriended and took the Abo Bennelong back to England to meet King George III.

Australia was only made for whitey with the White Australia Policy in 1901. This followed new colonial ideas about the supremacy of the white race, including - and Imperium will know this one - the new discourse of eugenics.

This is what you base your ideas on, but it was in vogue only for a very short period of time (the late Victorian era to the post-WWII boom). The British Empire was multi-racial. Today, the global economy is multi-racial. There was a short period of racial exclusiveness in between, and this is what you base your entire view of history on.

Back to top

IP Logged

Soren

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 25654
Gender: male

Re: Racist Australia
Reply #382 - Jan 26^th, 2012 at 7:04pm

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jan 26^th, 2012 at 6:41pm:

Honky,

The right answer is they did. Before they were systematically wiped out.

Yes, I know they many died quietly from smallpox and influenza to make way for the superior genepool. But the ones who survived were shot or rounded onto missions, where to speak an Aboriginal language was forbidden.

Hence we use knives and forks and speak English here - not some Abo monkey talk.

Are you still resentful about / having difficulties with knives and forks, PB? Plumbing? (What a drag, eh?)

Back to top

IP Logged

barnaby joe Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 1992 euchareena	Re: Racist Australia Reply #383 - Jan 26^th, 2012 at 7:05pm thats right folks - there was no discrimination against aboriginals prior to 1901 before racism was invented by francis galton.
Back to top	IP Logged

Paki gob on a stick

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 103596

Re: Racist Australia
Reply #384 - Jan 26^th, 2012 at 7:05pm

barnaby joe wrote on Jan 26^th, 2012 at 6:53pm:

i'm pretty sure abos never explicitly decided to remain as hunter gatherers. it's not like they were playing sid meier's civilisation and just decided to put their research funding slider down to 0% one day after they unlocked the STICK technology.

That's right! They invented the stick!

Back to top

IP Logged

barnaby joe Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 1992 euchareena	Re: Racist Australia Reply #385 - Jan 26^th, 2012 at 7:05pm Quote: Today, the global economy is multi-racial. what does this even mean THE GLOBAL ECONOMY IS MULTIRACIAL oh wow REALLY
Back to top	IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: Racist Australia
Reply #386 - Jan 26^th, 2012 at 7:07pm

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jan 26^th, 2012 at 7:02pm:

... wrote on Jan 26^th, 2012 at 6:47pm:

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jan 26^th, 2012 at 6:41pm:

The right answer is they did. Before they were systematically wiped out.

Yes, I know they many died quietly from smallpox and influenza to make way for the superior genepool. But the ones who survived were shot or rounded onto missions, where to speak an Aboriginal language was forbidden.

Hence we use knives and forks and speak English here - not some Abo monkey talk.

I guess that uh...sometimes poo happens.
But again, off on a tangent. I didn't say anything about the nature of the takeover that allowed whitey to come into control of this country. Only that it DID happen. Whitey DID take over, and when they did, they built the nation of Australia, with it's motto:

"By whitey for whitey"

Again, Honky, you're mistaken. Phillip's orders were to make friends with the local natives and create a society WITH them. And Phillip did this, taking Aboriginals into his household in Sydney. When he went home, he befriended and took the Abo Bennelong back to England to meet King George III.

Australia was only made for whitey with the White Australia Policy in 1901. This followed new colonial ideas about the supremacy of the white race, including - and Imperium will know this one - the new discourse of eugenics.

This is what you base your ideas on, but it was in vogue only for a very short period of time (the late Victorian era to the post-WWII boom). The British Empire was multi-racial. Today, the global economy is multi-racial. There was a short period of racial exclusiveness in between, and this is what you base your entire view of history on.

1901...1901....You mean Federation? Australias birth as a nation?

So, the following statement is correct:

The nation of australia was built for whitey by whitey.

So, what the hell are you arguing about?

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

barnaby joe Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 1992 euchareena	Re: Racist Australia Reply #387 - Jan 26^th, 2012 at 7:08pm ahahahaha hes got you there karnal
Back to top	IP Logged

Paki gob on a stick

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 103596

Re: Racist Australia
Reply #388 - Jan 26^th, 2012 at 7:10pm

barnaby joe wrote on Jan 26^th, 2012 at 7:05pm:

thats right folks - there was no discrimination against aboriginals prior to 1901 before racism was invented by francis galton.

There was no discrimination against Aboriginals prior to 1788 when they encountered a superior form of stick.

Anyway, why are you such an old boy? What have you got against wogs and boongs?

You're firing up nicely these days, dear. It's very good to see. You're almost making it worthwhile posting again.

Back to top

IP Logged

Paki gob on a stick

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 103596

Re: Racist Australia
Reply #389 - Jan 26^th, 2012 at 7:11pm

... wrote on Jan 26^th, 2012 at 7:07pm:

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jan 26^th, 2012 at 7:02pm:

... wrote on Jan 26^th, 2012 at 6:47pm:

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jan 26^th, 2012 at 6:41pm:

The right answer is they did. Before they were systematically wiped out.

Yes, I know they many died quietly from smallpox and influenza to make way for the superior genepool. But the ones who survived were shot or rounded onto missions, where to speak an Aboriginal language was forbidden.

Hence we use knives and forks and speak English here - not some Abo monkey talk.

I guess that uh...sometimes poo happens.
But again, off on a tangent. I didn't say anything about the nature of the takeover that allowed whitey to come into control of this country. Only that it DID happen. Whitey DID take over, and when they did, they built the nation of Australia, with it's motto:

"By whitey for whitey"

Again, Honky, you're mistaken. Phillip's orders were to make friends with the local natives and create a society WITH them. And Phillip did this, taking Aboriginals into his household in Sydney. When he went home, he befriended and took the Abo Bennelong back to England to meet King George III.

Australia was only made for whitey with the White Australia Policy in 1901. This followed new colonial ideas about the supremacy of the white race, including - and Imperium will know this one - the new discourse of eugenics.

This is what you base your ideas on, but it was in vogue only for a very short period of time (the late Victorian era to the post-WWII boom). The British Empire was multi-racial. Today, the global economy is multi-racial. There was a short period of racial exclusiveness in between, and this is what you base your entire view of history on.

1901...1901....You mean Federation? Australias birth as a nation?

So, the following statement is correct:

The nation of australia was built for whitey by whitey.

So, what the hell are you arguing about?

You got me there, Honky.

Back to top

IP Logged

Poll
Question: Are We More/Less Racists Than Other Nations
Less About The Same *Shut The Fk Up Brownie** « Created by: ____ on: Jan 19^th, 2012 at 10:30am »