Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
this expressed concept, defining barbarism (Read 5699 times)
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 22278
A cat with a view
Re: this expressed concept, defining barbarism
Reply #15 - Jan 14th, 2012 at 7:38pm
 
muso wrote on Jan 14th, 2012 at 8:50am:

So I agree with your point about action guided by reason.





A philosophy, guided by reason.

muso,

Didn't the Nazis have universities and a social philosophy, guided by 'pure' reason ?

Hmmmm?


"Oh but the Nazis philosophy was a faux philosophy.
It is clear that the Nazis were not REAL philosophers."

????

LOL



Q.
When will you intellectuals stop making excuses for your failures, and for your falsified social and scientific theories?

Google;
scientific fraud
Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: this expressed concept, defining barbarism
Reply #16 - Jan 14th, 2012 at 7:53pm
 
Karnal wrote on Jan 13th, 2012 at 4:58pm:
You've nailed it, Yadda. Barbarism is not secular. It lies within us all. However, very few of us, I think, are able to erradicate it with reason alone.

What we need is action guided by reason. All great teachers (and gods) have stated this. The more we practice, the more reason we obtain. Knowledge is not merely the result of studied analysis; it comes with compassion. As we wake up, it gradually dawns on us that we are no different to any other being. We have the same capacity for barbarism, and the same inherent greatness.

Of course, I may well be wrong.

Namaste.



Not every great human relationship is rational, PB. In fact, the greatest are not. Love isn't. Friendship isn't. Fatherhood, motherhood aren't. Brotherhood isn't. Comradeship, communal, religious bonds, loyalty aren't rational.

Reason is good when all the non-rational parameters of life - love, friendship, cameraderie, family - are given their due reverence. Once that is done, reason can come in and be king.



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: this expressed concept, defining barbarism
Reply #17 - Jan 14th, 2012 at 9:41pm
 
Yadda wrote on Jan 14th, 2012 at 7:38pm:
A philosophy, guided by reason.

muso,

Didn't the Nazis have universities and a social philosophy, guided by 'pure' reason ?

Hmmmm?



Reductio ad Hitlerum. Here we go again.

It's a special case of the association fallacy again, which is one that you like to use.

So we can conclude based on that association that
all Atheists are like Pol Pot, and are mass murderers   
All Christians are meek and mild
My dog is actually Beethoven (shared affinity for trees)

... and those vile Nazi's actually dared to apply reason. Therefore if you don't want to be a Nazi, then don't apply reason.  Roll Eyes

Yadda - you are safe. You'll never be a Nazi according to your logic.

Yadda - give us a break.
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: this expressed concept, defining barbarism
Reply #18 - Jan 14th, 2012 at 9:47pm
 
Soren wrote on Jan 14th, 2012 at 7:38pm:
Two things:

Muso - Professional conduct in itself is no guarantee of rationality. Being a technocrat or an official is not rational.




Oh I know that it's no guarantee. I didn't say that it was if you check my post. I just used the term  "more often".

Quote:
Not every great human relationship is rational, PB. In fact, the greatest are not. Love isn't. Friendship isn't. Fatherhood, motherhood aren't. Brotherhood isn't. Comradeship, communal, religious bonds, loyalty aren't rational.

Reason is good when all the non-rational parameters of life - love, friendship, cameraderie, family - are given their due reverence. Once that is done, reason can come in and be king.


Now I actually agree with that. I guess I was looking at it in the context of society rather than individuals. For example, a law is best when it's rational, and fit for its purpose. Now that rational approach can and should encompass the needs of individuals, but that makes it even more rational.

What about the opposite emotions such as hate? These are not rational either. So if one group of people loves something and another group hates it, how do you reconcile this in society other than being totally impartial and rational?
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 14th, 2012 at 10:00pm by muso »  

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 22278
A cat with a view
Re: this expressed concept, defining barbarism
Reply #19 - Jan 14th, 2012 at 10:00pm
 
muso wrote on Jan 14th, 2012 at 9:41pm:
Yadda wrote on Jan 14th, 2012 at 7:38pm:
A philosophy, guided by reason.

muso,

Didn't the Nazis have universities and a social philosophy, guided by 'pure' reason ?

Hmmmm?



Reductio ad Hitlerum. Here we go again.

It's a special case of the association fallacy again, which is one that you like to use.

So we can conclude based on that association that
all Atheists are like Pol Pot, and are mass murderers   
All Christians are meek and mild
My dog is actually Beethoven (shared affinity for trees)

... and those vile Nazi's actually dared to apply reason. Therefore if you don't want to be a Nazi, then don't apply reason.  Roll Eyes

Yadda - you are safe. You'll never be a Nazi according to your logic.

Yadda - give us a break.





OK, i'll give you a break muso.    Wink


Where is the utopian / atheist society?

Where is the just and peaceful atheist society?

The atheist society of men which is approaching the egalitarian ideal ?

Haven't you atheists had long enough yet, to set up a paradise on earth?



I know,
......you are waiting for the first outpost on Mars in 2043.

Where all residents will be screened, and only atheists will be accepted ?

And the Mars colony will be a shining example to mankind of what a society of rational atheists can achieve.

Right?     Grin



...


Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: this expressed concept, defining barbarism
Reply #20 - Jan 14th, 2012 at 10:09pm
 
Let's see....

Sweden?
1 homicide per 100,000 inhabitants.
23% of the population believe that a God exists.

or would you prefer the US?
5 homicides per 100,000 inhabitants.
92% of the population believe that a God exists.

Maybe you'd prefer rape statistics?  That's even worse.
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 22278
A cat with a view
Re: this expressed concept, defining barbarism
Reply #21 - Jan 14th, 2012 at 10:29pm
 
muso wrote on Jan 14th, 2012 at 10:09pm:
Let's see....

Sweden?
1 homicide per 100,000 inhabitants.
23% of the population believe that a God exists.

or would you prefer the US?
5 homicides per 100,000 inhabitants.
92% of the population believe that a God exists.

Maybe you'd prefer rape statistics?  That's even worse.




92% of the population of the USA believe that God exists?

And all of those good folks believe in God, just like G'Dubya does ?

p.s.
So does Tony Blair.



p.p.s
Jesus wasn't a 'Christian'.

Jesus was a Torah observant Jewish man.

And when Paul said.....

2 Timothy 3:16
All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:

.....he was not talking about the New Testament scripture.




92% of the population of the USA believe that God exists?

What does that mean ?

Does that mean, that 92% of the population of the USA follow the statutes and judgements, of the God of the bible ?


Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: this expressed concept, defining barbarism
Reply #22 - Jan 15th, 2012 at 10:45am
 
So in common with Soren, if you are losing the argument, you change the definitions. If they are commiting crime, then they can't possibly be Christians. we've had the reductio ad hitlerum and the association fallacy. Welcome to to the (implied) "No True Scotsman Fallacy" now. 

You started it. You asked "Where is the just and peaceful atheist society?".  So I delivered. If you don't think that largely atheistic Sweden is a just and peaceful country, then I don't believe that a just and peaceful society exists anywhere that will fit your criteria.

Your argument was about an atheist society compared with a theist society. Well the US is also a Christian society (In God we Trust and all that). Sweden is a society of godless atheists who incidentally are pretty law-abiding nice people and they have nice hair too.

You can't get clearer than that.
.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 15th, 2012 at 10:52am by muso »  

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 22278
A cat with a view
Re: this expressed concept, defining barbarism
Reply #23 - Jan 16th, 2012 at 12:25am
 
muso wrote on Jan 15th, 2012 at 10:45am:
So in common with Soren, if you are losing the argument, you change the definitions. If they are commiting crime, then they can't possibly be Christians. we've had the reductio ad hitlerum and the association fallacy. Welcome to to the (implied) "No True Scotsman Fallacy" now. 

You started it. You asked "Where is the just and peaceful atheist society?".  So I delivered. If you don't think that largely atheistic Sweden is a just and peaceful country, then I don't believe that a just and peaceful society exists anywhere that will fit your criteria.

Your argument was about an atheist society compared with a theist society. Well the US is also a Christian society (In God we Trust and all that). Sweden is a society of godless atheists who incidentally are pretty law-abiding nice people and they have nice hair too.

You can't get clearer than that.
.





"....if you are losing the argument, you change the definitions. If they are commiting crime, then they can't possibly be Christians."


Muso,

Q.
Who defines who is a moslem?

A.
ISLAM. [Who is a 'real' moslem, is clearly defined within ISLAMIC texts.]




Q.
Who defines who is a Christian or a Jew?    [<--- if we are going to use those terms.]

A.
God.i+++


"Your argument was about an atheist society compared with a theist society. Well the US is also a Christian society (In God we Trust and all that)...."


Muso,

IMO, there has not been a 'theist society' since the time of the wilderness wandering Hebrews.

We are living in a largely atheist world.

A largely un-Godly world, at least!

Sure, many societies have attempted to live according to how they imagined and how they interpreted that their god / deity wanted them to live.

But i don't believe that any of those societies of men ever 'approached' the, or indeed a, sacred ideal.

I don't believe that mankind [in a society of men] have ever been 'closer to God' than were, the ancient Hebrews .


Deuteronomy 5:31
.......I will speak unto thee all the commandments, and the statutes, and the judgments, which thou shalt teach them, that they may do them in the land which I give them to possess it.
32  Ye shall observe to do therefore as the LORD your God hath commanded you: ye shall not turn aside to the right hand or to the left.
33  Ye shall walk in all the ways which the LORD your God hath commanded you, that ye may live, and that it may be well with you, and that ye may prolong your days in the land which ye shall possess.






God has always been unhappy with the expressed nature of men.

Jeremiah 4:4
Circumcise yourselves to the LORD, and take away the foreskins of your heart, ye men of Judah and inhabitants of Jerusalem: lest my fury come forth like fire, and burn that none can quench it, because of the evil of your doings.

Jeremiah 9:26
Egypt, and Judah, and Edom, and the children of Ammon, and Moab, and all that are in the utmost corners, that dwell in the wilderness: for all these nations are uncircumcised, and all the house of Israel are uncircumcised in the heart.

Romans 2:29
But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.


How can God complain, after all, he made us this way ?

Sure.

And we make choices, all on our own.






Muso,

If God was clearly very unhappy with the conduct of ancient Judah and Israel [bible quotes above], what right have the people of the USA, to refer to themselves as 'Christians' [or to imagine that they are 'close to God'] ???

I am at fault too.

I wait, and i look for my redemption.

But i don't imagine that i am worthy or in any way righteous.



Isaiah 64:6
But we are all as an unclean thing, and all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags; and we all do fade as a leaf; and our iniquities, like the wind, have taken us away.


I've seen the purity of God.

But i know full-well that i cannot approach that purity, not in this body.



But i know that God has the power to 'transform' me, to heal me.

I want, and hope, to live in another reality.

A much, much, better one!     Grin


Isaiah 64:4
For since the beginning of the world men have not heard, nor perceived by the ear, neither hath the eye seen, O God, beside thee, what he hath prepared for him that waiteth for him.


Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: this expressed concept, defining barbarism
Reply #24 - Jan 16th, 2012 at 6:18am
 
Yadda wrote on Jan 16th, 2012 at 12:25am:
Muso,

Q.
Who defines who is a moslem?

A.
ISLAM. [Who is a 'real' moslem, is clearly defined within ISLAMIC texts.]




Q.
Who defines who is a Christian or a Jew?    [<--- if we are going to use those terms.]

A.
God.



So the Australian Bureau of Statistics is wrong?  Tongue
Actually, you're only partly right about the Christians. Remember that Catholics can be excommunicated. Their definition is also written down. It's in the catechism, and God has an agent on Earth (The Pope). - and there are differences among other sects, such as the Jehovah Witnesses.

As far as the definition of a Jew is concerned, it's complicated. Let's not go there. We're getting off track here. We should be asking "What defines a barbarian?" (They come from New Zealand and they play rugby)
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 22278
A cat with a view
Re: this expressed concept, defining barbarism
Reply #25 - Jan 16th, 2012 at 10:55am
 
muso wrote on Jan 16th, 2012 at 6:18am:

So the Australian Bureau of Statistics is wrong?  Tongue



Clearly.        Tongue







muso wrote on Jan 16th, 2012 at 6:18am:

Actually, you're only partly right about the Christians. Remember that Catholics can be excommunicated. Their definition is also written down. It's in the catechism, and God has an agent on Earth (The Pope). - and there are differences among other sects, such as the Jehovah Witnesses.

As far as the definition of a Jew is concerned, it's complicated. Let's not go there. We're getting off track here.



We should be asking "What defines a barbarian?"




(They come from New Zealand and they play rugby)





muso,

You ask, "What defines a barbarian?"

Perhaps a person who chooses to embrace an expressed ideal such as this ??? ;



"....the death of those who are killed for the cause of God gives more impetus to the cause, which continues to thrive on their blood."

ISLAMIC scholar, Sayyid Qutb.


cited again here.....

June 26, 2006
The roots of Islamism
".....Islamists believe in the re-ordering of society to secure total submission to a narrow, puritan and fundamentalist interpretation of Islam......
That cleansing process must be accomplished by suicidal violence, because, in the words of Islamism's most influential thinker, Sayyid Qutb, "the death of those who are killed for the cause of God gives more impetus to the cause, which continues to thrive on their blood.".....

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/michael_gove/article679544.e...

Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: this expressed concept, defining barbarism
Reply #26 - Jan 16th, 2012 at 2:58pm
 
Yes, he would fit the bill as a barbarian. So would the Portuguese inquisition in India. Apart from the fact that they tortured men women and children in Goa, in Kerala they burnt the sacred books of the Nasrani, or St Thomas Christians. This was one of the oldest Christian Churches anywhere in the world, and it was handed down by St Thomas during the 1st Century.

Among the books burned was the Malabar Nasrani Syriac Peshitta (the Lost Aramaic Bible), which would have been of incredible value to scholars today. 

The native version of Christianity was seen as heresy because they didn't venerate saints and they objected to images and statues, which they saw as idolatry.

Together with the Afghans who blew up the Buddhas of Bamiyan, the term "ignorant barbarian savages" is very apt for these guys.

Religious bigotry is capable of stirring up all kinds of barbarity, regardless of which religion it is. OK, other forms of bigotry and chauvinism such as nationalism can do the same. It seems to be the way that human beings are wired, especially when they don't think for themselves.

Incidentally, the concept of rationality and reason being the antithesis of barbarity (or evil, which is what we are really talking about) is not mine alone, as you no doubt know. Socrates (also Plato) is probably the best known proponent of that concept.

- and some regard him as a "honorary" Christian for some unknown reason.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 16th, 2012 at 3:05pm by muso »  

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 22278
A cat with a view
Re: this expressed concept, defining barbarism
Reply #27 - Jan 16th, 2012 at 11:14pm
 
muso,

I have no argument with what you said in post #26.

Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: this expressed concept, defining barbarism
Reply #28 - Jan 17th, 2012 at 2:35pm
 
muso wrote on Jan 15th, 2012 at 10:45am:
So in common with Soren, if you are losing the argument, you change the definitions. 



Muso, not accepting your argument, analogies or definitions is not changing the definition.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 18th, 2012 at 8:45am by Soren »  
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print