Australian Politics Forum - Same Sex Civil Unions FINALLY Passed in QLD

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register

Forum rules, Recent posts (with text), RSS, Search options, Browse all uploaded images
Home, Articles, Green Tax Shift, Evolution,

Australian Politics Forum › General Discussion › Federal Politics › Same Sex Civil Unions FINALLY Passed in QLD

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9

Same Sex Civil Unions FINALLY Passed in QLD (Read 7032 times)

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: Same Sex Civil Unions FINALLY Passed in QLD
Reply #120 - Dec 5^th, 2011 at 7:54am

olde.sault wrote on Dec 5^th, 2011 at 7:46am:

BigOl64 wrote on Dec 1^st, 2011 at 9:17am:

But will the homos FINALLY stop whinging; if so, I'm all for it.

I've no objection while it named "civil union" however, not if such a lifestyle is celebrated as "marriage".

While I have socialised with gays, I would not hack such a ceremony.

Two blokes or two women standing side by side would look pathetic.

Would both lesbians be in white and with veils?

LOL

It undermines

The only problem with that 'objection' is that in modern language, any officiated ceremony that a man and woman go through is referred to as being married......even civil unions. So there's no chance that a same sex ceremony, even if it's a civil union, won't be referred to the same way......even couples that are just common law based are considered married...

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

Soren Gold Member Offline Posts: 25654 Gender:	Re: Same Sex Civil Unions FINALLY Passed in QLD Reply #121 - Dec 5^th, 2011 at 9:26am What about unmmarried de factos? Why is that not good enough for Wong and Brown and the trest of the homos when it is good enough for the PM?
Back to top	IP Logged

muso Gold Member Offline Posts: 13151 Gladstone, Queensland Gender:	Re: Same Sex Civil Unions FINALLY Passed in QLD Reply #122 - Feb 6^th, 2012 at 9:03am A very weird addendum. I get legislative alerts sent to me by email at work. Provisions of the Civil Partnerships Act 2011 No. 46 (QLD) have been proclaimed by SL 2012 No. 15. This affects the following legislation: • Electrical Safety Act 2002 No. 42 It's Electrifying!
Back to top	1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not IP Logged

chicken_lipsforme Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 7090 Townsville NQ Gender:	Re: Same Sex Civil Unions FINALLY Passed in QLD Reply #123 - Feb 6^th, 2012 at 11:27am Two chickens can't make a rooster. This continued push to make deviant minority groups 'equal' does nothing for society.
Back to top	"Another boat, another policy failure from the Howard government" Julia Gillard Shadow Health Minister 2003. IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: Same Sex Civil Unions FINALLY Passed in QLD
Reply #124 - Feb 6^th, 2012 at 11:29am

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Dec 1^st, 2011 at 10:39am:

olde.sault wrote on Dec 1^st, 2011 at 10:27am:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Dec 1^st, 2011 at 9:48am:

Yes, we have a bit of way to go before we break down all of the moral values of society.

But let's keep chipping away.

Yes, paedophiliacs also claim that this is their way of loving. . .

Now now, peds have rights too and deserve love and happiness eh.
The incest lobby would be rubbing their hands together also, they have moved up one rung on the society totem pole.
And I'm one step closer to marrying my dog.
You see, we're in love. Wink

Actually incest and paedophilia are very different Chick...

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

gizmo_2655 Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 16010 South West NSW Gender:	Re: Same Sex Civil Unions FINALLY Passed in QLD Reply #125 - Feb 6^th, 2012 at 11:31am Soren wrote on Dec 5^th, 2011 at 9:26am: What about unmmarried de factos? Why is that not good enough for Wong and Brown and the trest of the homos when it is good enough for the PM? Unmarried defactos are still considered to be a common law marriage, after a certain time has elapsed..
Back to top	"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition. It's similar to a strawman fallacy" Bobbythebat IP Logged

chicken_lipsforme

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7090
Townsville NQ
Gender: male

Re: Same Sex Civil Unions FINALLY Passed in QLD
Reply #126 - Feb 6^th, 2012 at 12:03pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 6^th, 2012 at 11:29am:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Dec 1^st, 2011 at 10:39am:

olde.sault wrote on Dec 1^st, 2011 at 10:27am:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Dec 1^st, 2011 at 9:48am:

Yes, we have a bit of way to go before we break down all of the moral values of society.

But let's keep chipping away.

Yes, paedophiliacs also claim that this is their way of loving. . .

Actually incest and paedophilia are very different Chick...

Extremely so Gizmo.
However, both are minority groups of people who would wish their human rights to be recognised.
Personally, I'd hang the maggots.
Unfortunately my viewpoint doesn't suit the 21st century standard of morals.

"Another boat, another policy failure from the Howard government"

Julia Gillard
Shadow Health Minister
2003.

IP Logged

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

« Forum

‹ Board

Top of this page