skippy. wrote on Nov 25
th, 2011 at 3:54pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Nov 25
th, 2011 at 3:49pm:
GoddyofOz wrote on Nov 25
th, 2011 at 2:34pm:
All these tantrums from the rightards are very humorous to watch. Better yet, it was pretty much the grave the Libs dug for themselves.
They intended to sack Slipper, and he gets in early and bites them in the arse and gets labelled a traitor. Karma's a bitch.
because keeping a criminal in their ranks and rewarding him is more a labor way of doing things.
It is truly astonishing the way you labor people have zero principles and integrity. the end justifies the means... always.
LOL The Libs were happy to have Slipper in their party until the next election, there was no talk about dumping him before then and you know it,just more bitterness on your part.As goddy says, Slipper was About to get dumped,BUT NOT before the next election, Abbott could not afford to lose a member if he wanted to "bring this gov down" lolz, good luck with that now,hey???
G'day, skip....
I've come back to this thread as I think it was the first one on the subject.
So much whinging, wailing and gnashing of teeth from those 'born to rule'.
I like hypotheticals, so lets look at one.
Tony Abbott is PM in a minority govt.
Tony's Speaker vacates his position and Tony finds himself a disaffected member of the Opposition (Labor) to take the position, giving his minority govt a bit of extra breathing space.
A. Is Tony's action a brilliant move?
B. Is Tony doing the right thing by the voters?
C. Is Tony a hero for making such a move?
D. Will the Aust political system disintergrate because of this action?
E. Should Tony be made 'President for Life' for taking such action?
I thing you get the idea....
If the shoe was on the other foot, would it be the most "Brilliant Political Coup" of all time, or would it mean the end of civilization as we know it?