Put em up- put em up.
You assume way too much, but you are amusing enough, so far.
So what you are saying is that regardless of definition, you know for a fact that no Gods exist. Atheist is not a word I use to describe myself, because I don't think it's very useful.
I sometimes refer to myself as an atheistic theist. I believe that if a bunch of people believe in something enough, the effect will be something similar to tangible existence.
An example of this is money. If you live in a cave, don't spend money and if somebody gives you some plastic/ paper currency, you might think that it would be useful as tinder. (You want me to give you my goat for a handful of leaves? What kind of idiot are you?) Something to get the wood burning perhaps? However, if you are like most of us, you believe in money and participate in the financial scene to some extent. You are a religious person. Do you disagree? What is your definition of religious? Maybe it's different from mine. What is your definition of god? How does it differ from other people's definition. What makes my definition of god (social phenomenon) worse than yours? Who gets to choose?
What I'm getting at is that without a universal definition of god, you'll find it difficult to come up with a universal definition of atheist.
A god is an imaginary thing that some people worship. My wooden god is called a god by some people, and they worship it.
Look, you seem to be going on about the Bible a hell of a lot. Are you a fundamentalist or something? - or just an anti-Christian?