Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Send Topic Print
Christians Rampage Through Cairo (Read 22792 times)
Baronvonrort
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 19461
Gender: male
Re: Christians Rampage Through Cairo
Reply #45 - Oct 12th, 2011 at 6:41pm
 
falah wrote on Oct 12th, 2011 at 6:12pm:
Baronvonrort wrote on Oct 12th, 2011 at 3:32pm:
Maybe the jews and christians think it is wrong to stone consenting adults to death for adultery...
The christians stopped killing heretics hundreds of years ago as well.


So in their arrogance, they think that they know better than God Almighty?

Baronvonrort wrote on Oct 12th, 2011 at 3:32pm:
Where in the Quran does it say people are to be stoned to death for adultery Falah i could not find any verse saying muslims should do this?

If the Quran has no verse authorising stoning for adultery then why do muslims say stoning is the prescribed punishment?



“...nor commit illegal sexual intercourse and whoever does this shall receive the punishment...

[al-Furqaan 25:69]


‘Umar ibn al-Khattaab (a companion of Prophet Muhammed and the 3rd Roshidoon Caliph) said, when he was sitting on the pulpit of the Prophet of Allaah (Muhammed): “God sent Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) with the truth, and revealed to him the Book. One of the things that He revealed was the verse of stoning, which we have read and understood. The Prophet of God  carried out the punishment of stoning and we did so after him. I fear that as time goes by, people will say, ‘We do not find any mention of stoning in the Book of God (Quran),’ so they will go astray by forsaking an obligation that was revealed by God. In the Book of God, stoning is the punishment deserved by any previously-married person, man or woman, who commits adultery, if proof is established, or pregnancy results, or he or she confesses.”

(Narrated by al-Bukhaari, 2462; Muslim, 1691)


O ye who believe, obey God, and obey the Prophet, and those charged with authority among you. If ye differ in anything among yourselves, refer it to God and His Prophet, if ye do believe in God and the Last Day: that is best, and most suitable for final determination. (Quran 4: 59).


You keep telling us how buggered the bible and torah are does it surprise you that people who follow those holy books dont take them literally?
I think it was Pope leo who told his followers not to take the bible literally with some things.
Have a look at how Galileo was persecuted for having a thought that contradicted the bible.


Are you sure you are quoting the right verse it says nothing about stoning in 25:69-
http://quran.com/25/69

4:59 says nothing about stoning to death did you make another mistake?
http://quran.com/4/59


I asked for the Quran verse on stoning, the Quran supposedly came from Allah whereas the hadith is man made like a series of chinese whispers.
Sahih Al Bukhari is NOT THE QURAN i should know i have a copy by Muhsin Khan so why are you quoting the hadith when i asked for the Quran verse?

The truth is there is nothing in the Quran directing muslims about stoning to death for adultery.

Did Aisha's pet goat eat the verse about stoning to death for adultery?
http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Qur%27an,_Hadith_and_Scholars:Islamic_Silliness#Goat_a...

So much for the Quran never being corrupted,apart from the bits Aisha's goat ate.
Back to top
 

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.
 
IP Logged
 
falah
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3162
Re: Christians Rampage Through Cairo
Reply #46 - Oct 12th, 2011 at 6:44pm
 
Soren wrote on Oct 12th, 2011 at 5:46pm:
The Kingdom of Egypt in the period between 1922 and 1952 was flawed and ramshackle and corrupt, but it got closer to a functioning, pluralist society than anything in the 60 years since. For example, in 1923, Egypt’s first full year as a sovereign state, the country’s Minister of Finance was a man called Joseph Cattaui, a Member of Parliament and a Jew.

Try to imagine that now: a Jew serving as an Arab Muslim nation’s Finance Minister – or even getting elected as an obscure backbench MP. Sounds like something from a Give-peace-a-chance multifaith fantasy. But it actually happened – and then it stopped happening, and then it became inconceivable for it to happen ever again under any plausible scenario.

It’s not just that in Egypt a Jew can’t be Finance Minister but that a Jew can’t be. Because Egypt spent the second half of the 20th century getting worse, and is spending the new century getting worser. We now accept a Jew-free Egypt as a normal feature of life. No doubt we shall soon do the same with a Copt-free Egypt. But we could at least stop insulting those on the receiving end of the “Arab Spring” by pretending that it’s any kind of flowering of freedom.

steynonline.com.


Just so. No Jews are tolerated in the Muslim Middle East and now no Copts (the pre-Muslim inhabitants) of Egypt are tolerated.
Arab Spring - winter for everyone else.





Don't know if anybody told you this Soren, but Egypt became more secular in the time period you are talking about.

The secular regime did things which were not from Islam, such as preventing Christians from building new churches.

It was in fact Muslim organisation like the Muslim Brotherhood, who urged the secular government to allow Christians to build churches.

The Muslim Brotherhood also urged the secular government to protect Christian places of worship:

Muslim Brotherhood calls for protection of churches
http://www.thedailynewsegypt.com/religion/muslim-brotherhood-calls-for-protection-of-churches-al-azhar-condemns-baghdad-attack-dp1.html


Jews and Christians can hold positions in an Islamic government, as long as they do not have access to state secrets.


Muslim Brotherhood appoints Christian vice president
http://au.christiantoday.com/article/muslim-brotherhood-appoints-christian-vice-president/11090.htm
Back to top
 

Nothing is worthy of worship except God Almighty - our Creator!
 
IP Logged
 
falah
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3162
Re: Christians Rampage Through Cairo
Reply #47 - Oct 12th, 2011 at 6:51pm
 
Baronvonrort wrote on Oct 12th, 2011 at 6:41pm:
I asked for the Quran verse on stoning, the Quran supposedly came from Allah whereas the hadith is man made like a series of chinese whispers.
Sahih Al Bukhari is NOT THE QURAN i should know i have a copy by Muhsin Khan so why are you quoting the hadith when i asked for the Quran verse?


I provided the verse which says to obey the prophet. The other verse I gave mentions that the adulterers should be punished. Bukhari recorded how the prophet said that they should be punished.

As for the hadith you obviously have no understanding of how scholars like Bukhari collected them, and classified them.

Hadeeth have different grades such as authentic, good, weak, etc.

The hadeeth I produced is considered authentic. That means that every person in the chain of narraotrs must be known as a trustworthy Muslim who has no memory problems. The biographies of each person in the chain of narrators must be known.

This makes books of hadeeth so much more reliable than the Bible. Bible scholars do not know who wrote the books of the Bible - although they do know that they were not written by the prophets themselves.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 12th, 2011 at 7:02pm by falah »  

Nothing is worthy of worship except God Almighty - our Creator!
 
IP Logged
 
Baronvonrort
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 19461
Gender: male
Re: Christians Rampage Through Cairo
Reply #48 - Oct 12th, 2011 at 7:02pm
 
falah wrote on Oct 12th, 2011 at 6:51pm:
Baronvonrort wrote on Oct 12th, 2011 at 6:41pm:
falah wrote on Oct 12th, 2011 at 6:12pm:
Baronvonrort wrote on Oct 12th, 2011 at 3:32pm:
Maybe the jews and christians think it is wrong to stone consenting adults to death for adultery...
The christians stopped killing heretics hundreds of years ago as well.


So in their arrogance, they think that they know better than God Almighty?

Baronvonrort wrote on Oct 12th, 2011 at 3:32pm:
Where in the Quran does it say people are to be stoned to death for adultery Falah i could not find any verse saying muslims should do this?

If the Quran has no verse authorising stoning for adultery then why do muslims say stoning is the prescribed punishment?



“...nor commit illegal sexual intercourse and whoever does this shall receive the punishment...

[al-Furqaan 25:69]


‘Umar ibn al-Khattaab (a companion of Prophet Muhammed and the 3rd Roshidoon Caliph) said, when he was sitting on the pulpit of the Prophet of Allaah (Muhammed): “God sent Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) with the truth, and revealed to him the Book. One of the things that He revealed was the verse of stoning, which we have read and understood. The Prophet of God  carried out the punishment of stoning and we did so after him. I fear that as time goes by, people will say, ‘We do not find any mention of stoning in the Book of God (Quran),’ so they will go astray by forsaking an obligation that was revealed by God. In the Book of God, stoning is the punishment deserved by any previously-married person, man or woman, who commits adultery, if proof is established, or pregnancy results, or he or she confesses.”

(Narrated by al-Bukhaari, 2462; Muslim, 1691)


O ye who believe, obey God, and obey the Prophet, and those charged with authority among you. If ye differ in anything among yourselves, refer it to God and His Prophet, if ye do believe in God and the Last Day: that is best, and most suitable for final determination. (Quran 4: 59).


You keep telling us how buggered the bible and torah are does it surprise you that people who follow those holy books dont take them literally?
I think it was Pope leo who told his followers not to take the bible literally with some things.
Have a look at how Galileo was persecuted for having a thought that contradicted the bible.


Are you sure you are quoting the right verse it says nothing about stoning in 25:69-
http://quran.com/25/69

4:59 says nothing about stoning to death did you make another mistake?
http://quran.com/4/59


I asked for the Quran verse on stoning, the Quran supposedly came from Allah whereas the hadith is man made like a series of chinese whispers.
Sahih Al Bukhari is NOT THE QURAN i should know i have a copy by Muhsin Khan so why are you quoting the hadith when i asked for the Quran verse?


I provided the verse which says to obey the prophet. The other verse I gave mentions that the adluterers should be punished. Bukhari recorded how the prophet said that they should be punished.


Bukhari from your quote-
"God sent Mohammad........One of the things that he revealed was the verse of stoning,which we have read and understood"

Bukhari says this verse was revealed by Allah so why is it missing from the Quran?

If a verse is missing from the Quran does that mean the Quran has been corrupted?

Can you dismiss the hadith that a goat ate the verse on stoning as weak when no other reason is given why this verse is missing from the Quran?

Do you believe the hadith that satan urinates in the ear of those who miss morning prayer?
Back to top
 

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.
 
IP Logged
 
falah
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3162
Re: Christians Rampage Through Cairo
Reply #49 - Oct 12th, 2011 at 7:25pm
 
Baronvonrort wrote on Oct 12th, 2011 at 7:02pm:
Bukhari from your quote-
"God sent Mohammad........One of the things that he revealed was the verse of stoning,which we have read and understood"

Bukhari says this verse was revealed by Allah so why is it missing from the Quran?


It is not missing. I already provided it. The verse says that adulterers must be punished, and Prophet Muhammed explained how they should be punished. Therefore the verse refers to the stoning.

Baronvonrort wrote on Oct 12th, 2011 at 7:02pm:
If a verse is missing from the Quran does that mean the Quran has been corrupted?


There are no missing verses.

Baronvonrort wrote on Oct 12th, 2011 at 7:02pm:
Can you dismiss the hadith that a goat ate the verse on stoning as weak when no other reason is given why this verse is missing from the Quran?


If you had studied Islamic history, you would know that at the time of Prophet Muhammed's death, there were many people who had memorised the entire Quran by heart. There were also several written copies of it.

The Quran has been desigend to be a book which is easily memorised. There are millions of Muslims around the world who have memorised it by heart. This is how the Quran is protected from corruption, by the people memorising it.

"And We (God uses the royal "we") have made the Holy Quran easy to understand and remember, then is there any that will receive admonition."(The Quran, 54:17)

Baronvonrort wrote on Oct 12th, 2011 at 7:02pm:
Do you believe the hadith that satan urinates in the ear of those who miss morning prayer?


I have no reason disbelieve it. The type of devil mentioned here is the type from the jinn. The jinn are not made of chemicals like humans, but rather, are made from the smokeless flame. I see no reason to believe that their urine is in any way like the urine of humans or animals. Jinns are a totally different typ of creation.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 12th, 2011 at 7:31pm by falah »  

Nothing is worthy of worship except God Almighty - our Creator!
 
IP Logged
 
falah
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3162
Re: Christians Rampage Through Cairo
Reply #50 - Oct 12th, 2011 at 7:43pm
 
Rape in the Bible?


Judges 21: 10- 24 :



So they sent twelve thousand warriors to Jabesh-gilead with orders to kill everyone there, including women and children.  "This is what you are to do," they said. "Completely destroy all the males and every woman who is not a virgin."  Among the residents of Jabesh-gilead they found four hundred young virgins who had never slept with a man, and they brought them to the camp at Shiloh in the land of Canaan.



    The Israelite assembly sent a peace delegation to the little remnant of Benjamin who were living at the rock of Rimmon. Then the men of Benjamin returned to their homes, and the four hundred women of Jabesh-gilead who were spared were given to them as wives.  But there were not enough women for all of them.  The people felt sorry for Benjamin because the LORD had left this gap in the tribes of Israel.  So the Israelite leaders asked, "How can we find wives for the few who remain, since all the women of the tribe of Benjamin are dead?  There must be heirs for the survivors so that an entire tribe of Israel will not be lost forever.  But we cannot give them our own daughters in marriage because we have sworn with a solemn oath that anyone who does this will fall under God's curse."



    Then they thought of the annual festival of the LORD held in Shiloh, between Lebonah and Bethel, along the east side of the road that goes from Bethel to Shechem.  They told the men of Benjamin who still needed wives, "Go and hide in the vineyards.  When the women of Shiloh come out for their dances, rush out from the vineyards, and each of you can take one of them home to be your wife! And when their fathers and brothers come to us in protest, we will tell them, 'Please be understanding.  Let them have your daughters, for we didn't find enough wives for them when we destroyed Jabesh-gilead. And you are not guilty of breaking the vow since you did not give your daughters in marriage to them.'"  So the men of Benjamin did as they were told.  They kidnapped the women who took part in the celebration and carried them off to the land of their own inheritance.  Then they rebuilt their towns and lived in them.  So the assembly of Israel departed by tribes and families, and they returned to their own homes.
Back to top
 

Nothing is worthy of worship except God Almighty - our Creator!
 
IP Logged
 
falah
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3162
Re: Christians Rampage Through Cairo
Reply #51 - Oct 12th, 2011 at 7:45pm
 
Raping Little Girls Commanded By Bible?


Judges 21: 10- 24 :



So they sent twelve thousand warriors to Jabesh-gilead with orders to kill everyone there, including women and children.  "This is what you are to do," they said. "Completely destroy all the males and every woman who is not a virgin."  Among the residents of Jabesh-gilead they found four hundred young virgins who had never slept with a man, and they brought them to the camp at Shiloh in the land of Canaan.



    The Israelite assembly sent a peace delegation to the little remnant of Benjamin who were living at the rock of Rimmon. Then the men of Benjamin returned to their homes, and the four hundred women of Jabesh-gilead who were spared were given to them as wives.  But there were not enough women for all of them.  The people felt sorry for Benjamin because the LORD had left this gap in the tribes of Israel.  So the Israelite leaders asked, "How can we find wives for the few who remain, since all the women of the tribe of Benjamin are dead?  There must be heirs for the survivors so that an entire tribe of Israel will not be lost forever.  But we cannot give them our own daughters in marriage because we have sworn with a solemn oath that anyone who does this will fall under God's curse."



    Then they thought of the annual festival of the LORD held in Shiloh, between Lebonah and Bethel, along the east side of the road that goes from Bethel to Shechem.  They told the men of Benjamin who still needed wives, "Go and hide in the vineyards.  When the women of Shiloh come out for their dances, rush out from the vineyards, and each of you can take one of them home to be your wife!  And when their fathers and brothers come to us in protest, we will tell them, 'Please be understanding.  Let them have your daughters, for we didn't find enough wives for them when we destroyed Jabesh-gilead. And you are not guilty of breaking the vow since you did not give your daughters in marriage to them.'"  So the men of Benjamin did as they were told.  They kidnapped the women who took part in the celebration and carried them off to the land of their own inheritance.  Then they rebuilt their towns and lived in them.  So the assembly of Israel departed by tribes and families, and they returned to their own homes.





So note, the men hide behind bushes like stalkers, and they wait for the women and once they see the women they rush the women and kidnap them and then basically marry them! This is clear rape, I wonder what missionary Sam Shamoun has to say about this, since the missionary has a lot to say on the subject of muta to which he is always refuted, what will say about men hiding like stalkers and then kidnapping women and marrying them? This is what you call ‘legalized rape’.





The fact is no Christian can explain those disgusting verses.





Numbers 31: 7-18 :



They attacked Midian just as the LORD had commanded Moses, and they killed all the men.  All five of the Midianite kings – Evi, Rekem, Zur, Hur, and Reba – died in the battle.  They also killed Balaam son of Beor with the sword.  Then the Israelite army captured the Midianite women and children and seized their cattle and flocks and all their wealth as plunder.  They burned all the towns and villages where the Midianites had lived.  After they had gathered the plunder and captives, both people and animals, they brought them all to Moses and Eleazar the priest, and to the whole community of Israel, which was camped on the plains of Moab beside the Jordan River, across from Jericho.



    Moses, Eleazar the priest, and all the leaders of the people went to meet them outside the camp.  But Moses was furious with all the military commanders who had returned from the battle.  "Why have you let all the women live?" he demanded.  "These are the very ones who followed Balaam's advice and caused the people of Israel to rebel against the LORD at Mount Peor.  They are the ones who caused the plague to strike the LORD's people.  Now kill all the boys and all the women who have slept with a man.  Only the young girls who are virgins may live; you may keep them for yourselves.





So Moses and his army basically killed all the boys, including infants and just let the little young girls live. Who knows what they did with these little girls. So these passages basically allowed murder and left all the virgins to themselves whom they obviously slept with, many of these virgins were three year olds as well:



"....The Tannaïtic Midrash Sifre to Numbers in §157 comments on the above quoted commandment of MOSES to kill the Midianite women as well as the male children...."

"....According to the Tannaïte Rabbis, MOSES therefore had ordered the Israelites to kill all women older than three years and a day, because they were "suitable for having sexual relations." [138]...."

"Said Rabbi Joseph, "Come and take note: A girl three years and one day old is betrothed by intercourse....."

"A girl three years and one day old is betrothed by intercourse. "A girl three years old may be betrothed through an act of sexual intercourse," the words of R. Meir. And sages say, "Three years and one day old."....."

Children

Sometimes one has to read a passage twice to believe what has been written in the Sacred Books of Judaism: what has been decreed the way to a holy life by the "sages of blessed memory... whose words are the natural sounds of Judaism" [131]:
Back to top
 

Nothing is worthy of worship except God Almighty - our Creator!
 
IP Logged
 
falah
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3162
Re: Christians Rampage Through Cairo
Reply #52 - Oct 12th, 2011 at 7:45pm
 
Rape of Little Children Commanded in the Bible continued


Said Rabbi Joseph, "Come and take note: A girl three years and one day old is betrothed by intercourse. And if a Levir has had intercourse with her, he has acquired her. And one can be liable on her account because of the law prohibiting intercourse with a married woman. And she imparts uncleanness to him who has intercourse with her when she is menstruating, to convey uncleanness to the lower as to the upper layer [of what lies beneath]. If she was married to a priest, she may eat food in the status of priestly rations. If one of those who are unfit for marriage with her had intercourse with her, he has rendered her unfit to marry into the priesthood. If any of those who are forbidden in the Torah to have intercourse with her had intercourse with her, he is put to death on her account, but she is free of responsibility [M.Nid. 5:4].
Sanhedrin 7/55B [132]

R. Nahman bar Isaac said. "They made the decree that a gentile child should be deemed unclean with the flux uncleanness [described at Lev.15], so that an Israelite child should not hang around with him and commit pederasty [as he does]."
For said R. Zira, "I had much anguish with R. Assi, and R. Assi with R. Yohanan, and R. Yohanan with R. Yannai, and R. Yannai with R. Nathan b. Amram, and R. Nathan b. Amram with Rabbi [on this matter]: 'From what age is a gentile child deemed unclean with the flux uncleanness [described at Lev.15]'? And he said to me, 'On the day on which he is born.' But when I came to R. Hiyya, he said to me, 'From the age of nine years and one day.' And when I came and laid the matter before Rabbi, he said to me, 'Discard my reply and adopt that of R. Hiyya, who declared, "From what age is a gentile child deemed unclean with the flux uncleanness [described at Lev.15]? From the age of nine years and one day."'
[37A] Since he is then suitable for having sexual relations, he also is deemed unclean with the flux uncleanness [of Lev.15]."
Said Rabina, "Therefore a gentile girl who is three years and one day old, since she is then suitable to have sexual relations, also imparts uncleanness of the flux variety."
That is self-evident!
Abodah Zarah 36B-37A [133]



The basis for these rulings is the following Mishnaic passage of Tractate Niddah (filth):



A girl three years and one day old is betrothed by intercourse. "A girl three years old may be betrothed through an act of sexual intercourse," the words of R. Meir. And sages say, "Three years and one day old."
And if a Levir has had intercourse with her, he has acquired her. And they are liable on her account because of the law prohibiting intercourse with a married woman. And she imparts uncleanness to him who has intercourse with her when she is menstruating to convey uncleanness to the lower as to the upper layer. If she was married to a priest, she eats heave offering. If one of those who are unfit for marriage has intercourse with her, he has rendered her unfit to marry into the priesthood. If one of all those who are forbidden in the Torah to have intercourse with her did so, they are put to death on her account. But she is free of responsibility.
If she is younger than that age, intercourse with her is like putting a finger in the eye.
(Mishnah Niddah 5:4) [134]



Thus, one "of the many important issues worked out in the Mishnah concerns proper conduct with women," [135] and the "entire society of Judaism – that is, the community formed by the Torah – found in the Talmud those modes of thought and inquiry, those media of order and value, that guided the formation of public affairs and private life as well." [136]

While it is reassuring to see there was at least some limit as to what the sages would declare holy and moral, this ruling had severe implications on the interpretation of other topics as well. The Tannaïtic Midrash Sifre to Numbers in §157 comments on the above quoted commandment of Moses to kill the Midianite women as well as the male children:



"Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that has known a man by sleeping with him.(Num 31:17).
[This] refers to her who has slept with a man as well as her who is suitable for intercourse, even when she has not slept with a man...
But all the young girls who have not known a man by sleeping with him, keep alive for yourselves. From here R. Shimon b. Yohai used to say: a Proselyte girl who became a proselyte in the age of less than three years and one day, is rendered fit to marry into the priesthood." [137]



According to the Tannaïte Rabbis, Moses therefore had ordered the Israelites to kill all women older than three years and a day, because they were "suitable for having sexual relations." [138]

Bibliography:

[131] Ibid., vol.XXI.A-D, Tractate Bava Mesia, Atlanta: Scholars Press 1990, p.ix-x.

[132] Ibid., vol.XXIII.B, Tractate Sanhedrin 1984, 150. See also vol.XIX.A, Tractate Qiddushin 10a-b, 1992, 33. "Menstruating" here of course refers to the ritual "flux uncleanness" described in Lev.15.

[133] Ibid., vol.XXV.A, Tractate Abodah Zarah, 1991, 168. Emphasis original.

[134] J. Neusner, The Talmud of Babylonia. A complete outline, Part IV. The Division of Holy Things. B. Number 37. 1995, 704.

[135] Neusner 1993, 41.

[136] Neusner 1995, 7.

[137] Kuhn 1959, §157, 652f. My translation. In general, proselytes are not allowed to marry into the priesthood.

[138] Ibid., §157, footnote 86, 653.
Back to top
 

Nothing is worthy of worship except God Almighty - our Creator!
 
IP Logged
 
falah
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3162
Re: Christians Rampage Through Cairo
Reply #53 - Oct 12th, 2011 at 7:49pm
 
Sometimes Bible Changes Mind & Says If Rapists Pay Money To Victims Father, Then They Get To Marry Their Victims!


Deuteronomy
Chapter 22:25-29

25 But if a man find a betrothed damsel in the field, and the man force her, and lie with her: then the man only that lay with her shall die. 26 But unto the damsel thou shalt do nothing; there is in the damsel no sin worthy of death: for as when a man riseth against his neighbor, and slayeth him, even so is this matter: 27 For he found her in the field, and the betrothed damsel cried, and there was none to save her. 28 If a man find a damsel that is a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found; 29 Then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel's father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife; because he hath humbled her, he may not put her away all his days
Back to top
 

Nothing is worthy of worship except God Almighty - our Creator!
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: Christians Rampage Through Cairo
Reply #54 - Oct 12th, 2011 at 7:55pm
 
falah wrote on Oct 12th, 2011 at 2:41pm:
Soren wrote on Oct 12th, 2011 at 1:23pm:
That's a failah, falah.

I am not a polytheist - therefore you are not a monotheist. You are in trouble.




You are a polytheist. You worship your own desires above God's law. Thereby you are a polytheist


Er... sorry, I don't actually worship my desires. Therefore I am not a polytheist > therefore you are not a moniotheists > therefore you are in trouble for self-abuse.




Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 40923
Gender: male
Re: Christians Rampage Through Cairo
Reply #55 - Oct 12th, 2011 at 7:58pm
 
falah wrote on Oct 12th, 2011 at 7:49pm:
Sometimes Bible Changes Mind & Says If Rapists Pay Money To Victims Father, Then They Get To Marry Their Victims!


Deuteronomy
Chapter 22:25-29

25 But if a man find a betrothed damsel in the field, and the man force her, and lie with her: then the man only that lay with her shall die. 26 But unto the damsel thou shalt do nothing; there is in the damsel no sin worthy of death: for as when a man riseth against his neighbor, and slayeth him, even so is this matter: 27 For he found her in the field, and the betrothed damsel cried, and there was none to save her. 28 If a man find a damsel that is a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found; 29 Then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel's father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife; because he hath humbled her, he may not put her away all his days


thats for jews.
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
falah
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3162
Re: Christians Rampage Through Cairo
Reply #56 - Oct 12th, 2011 at 8:00pm
 
Soren wrote on Oct 12th, 2011 at 7:55pm:
]

Er... sorry, I don't actually worship my desires.


Prove it.
Back to top
 

Nothing is worthy of worship except God Almighty - our Creator!
 
IP Logged
 
Deborahmac09
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1619
Re: Christians Rampage Through Cairo
Reply #57 - Oct 12th, 2011 at 8:02pm
 
Sprintcyclist wrote on Oct 12th, 2011 at 7:58pm:
falah wrote on Oct 12th, 2011 at 7:49pm:
Sometimes Bible Changes Mind & Says If Rapists Pay Money To Victims Father, Then They Get To Marry Their Victims!


Deuteronomy
Chapter 22:25-29

25 But if a man find a betrothed damsel in the field, and the man force her, and lie with her: then the man only that lay with her shall die. 26 But unto the damsel thou shalt do nothing; there is in the damsel no sin worthy of death: for as when a man riseth against his neighbor, and slayeth him, even so is this matter: 27 For he found her in the field, and the betrothed damsel cried, and there was none to save her. 28 If a man find a damsel that is a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found; 29 Then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel's father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife; because he hath humbled her, he may not put her away all his days


thats for jews.



What was JC again?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: Christians Rampage Through Cairo
Reply #58 - Oct 12th, 2011 at 8:03pm
 
falah wrote on Oct 12th, 2011 at 6:44pm:
Muslim Brotherhood appoints Christian vice president
http://au.christiantoday.com/article/muslim-brotherhood-appoints-christian-vice-president/11090.htm



As that very article makes it clear, galah:

"Coptic human rights activist Wagih Yacoub said in a report by International Christian Concern: “There is no doubt that the Muslim Brotherhood and the Salafis are allied. The Brotherhood plays politics and the Salafis are causing chaos so they can empty Egypt of Christians and make it an Islamic state."

The thing is, Muslims like you are just too stupid. It's nothing personal, it's just that your belief makes you, actively makes you, stupid. Your choice is to be a salafi Islamist Muslim and be stupid - or be a normal person with some critical faculties and the ability to at least ask or hear questions about a 1400 year old compilation (Koran).

You actively choose stupid. You are not applying traditional outlook, you are applying practiced, rigorous stupidity.




Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
falah
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3162
Re: Christians Rampage Through Cairo
Reply #59 - Oct 12th, 2011 at 9:18pm
 
Soren, personal insults are the trick of the person who knows that his own argument lacks substance.



Become Personal, Insulting, Rude

A last trick is to become personal, insulting, rude, as soon as you perceive that your opponent has the upper hand, and that you are going to come off worst. It consists in passing from the subject of dispute, as from a lost game, to the disputant himself, and in some way attacking his person. It may be called the argumentum ad personam, to distinguish it from the argumentum ad hominem, which passes from the objective discussion of the subject pure and simple to the statements or admissions which your opponent has made in regard to it. But in becoming personal you leave the subject altogether, and turn your attack to his person, by remarks of an offensive and spiteful character. It is an appeal from the virtues of the intellect to the virtues of the body, or to mere animalism. This is a very popular trick, because every one is able to carry it into effect; and so it is of frequent application. Now the question is, What counter-trick avails for the other party? for if he has recourse to the same rule, there will be blows, or a duel, or an action for slander.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 12th, 2011 at 9:28pm by falah »  

Nothing is worthy of worship except God Almighty - our Creator!
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Send Topic Print