Quote:


I doubt it, Monckton is a master of obfuscation. I'm well aware of what he is capable of.

And in the news today, the House of Lords disowns Monckton and demands he cease and desist in claiming to be a member.

Quote:

.





Monckton’s commanding performance at the National Press Club today made the vast majority of journalists there seem:

- warmist group thinkers in a pack attack.

- under-researched

- ignorant of basic criticisms of warmist deceits, with one journalist even referring to carbon dioxide as “pollution” and another accusing Monckton falsely of denying “climate change”.

What was shown would have confirmed the suspicions of many about the bias of the media in reporting global warming.


http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/monck...





“The House of Lords Act 1999 debarred all but 92 of the 650 Hereditary Peers, including my father, from sitting or voting, and purported to – but did not – remove membership of the Upper House. Letters Patent granting peerages, and consequently membership, are the personal gift of the Monarch. Only a specific law can annul a grant. The 1999 Act was a general law. The then Government, realizing this defect, took three maladroit steps: it wrote asking expelled Peers to return their Letters Patent (though that does not annul them); in 2009 it withdrew the passes admitting expelled Peers to the House (and implying they were members); and it told the enquiry clerks to deny they were members: but a written Parliamentary Answer by the Lord President of the Council admits that general legislation cannot annul Letters Patent, so I am The Viscount Monckton of Brenchley (as my passport shows), a member of the Upper House but without the right to sit or vote, and I have never pretended otherwise.”








.

.




"FORTY EIGHT hours have passed since Wendy Carlisle of  Background Briefing put to air her assault on Viscount Monckton -- two days in which a transcript of the sixty-minute slander has failed to appear.

The ABC must struggle through on a paltry billion-or-so dollars per year, but surely it could have processed and posted the script by now. Unless, of course, it would prefer to make a line-by-line examination of its handiwork rather difficult.

Readers might like to drop ABC supremo Mark Scott a polite note and..."

http://bunyipitude.blogspot.com/2011/07/missing-link.html






.

.











.

Flying Binghi wrote on Jul 19^th, 2011 at 11:10pm:


Climate muppets:

http://www.parliament.uk/documents/lords-information-office/2011/letter-to-visco...

Dsmithy70 wrote on Jul 19^th, 2011 at 11:08pm:


Found a copy on Youtube smithy...It runs an hour though...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=207lg-1GWAE

And just for giggles, count the number of times Dr Denniss mentions 'conspiracy'...

.


astro_surf wrote on Jul 19^th, 2011 at 11:16pm:


“The House of Lords Act 1999 debarred all but 92 of the 650 Hereditary Peers, including my father, from sitting or voting, and purported to – but did not – remove membership of the Upper House. Letters Patent granting peerages, and consequently membership, are the personal gift of the Monarch. Only a specific law can annul a grant. The 1999 Act was a general law. The then Government, realizing this defect, took three maladroit steps: it wrote asking expelled Peers to return their Letters Patent (though that does not annul them); in 2009 it withdrew the passes admitting expelled Peers to the House (and implying they were members); and it told the enquiry clerks to deny they were members: but a written Parliamentary Answer by the Lord President of the Council admits that general legislation cannot annul Letters Patent, so I am The Viscount Monckton of Brenchley (as my passport shows), a member of the Upper House but without the right to sit or vote, and I have never pretended otherwise.”











.