Australian Politics Forum

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: OOOPPPS
Reply #90 - May 31^st, 2011 at 4:37pm

progressiveslol wrote on May 31^st, 2011 at 4:36pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on May 31^st, 2011 at 4:33pm:

progressiveslol wrote on May 31^st, 2011 at 4:32pm:

A non-answer is still a non-answer no matter the spin.

All you are talking about is co-operation and components. You cant give examples on a gas as if to talk about countries co-operations. You are in the wrong debate with me if you want me to do the guess work.

You need to stick with the 'what action and co-opertation do we do' crowd.

It's more fun to be in your crowd considering there are literally only a handful of you "geniuses" left. Read the edit on my reply. And from there, like I said, formulate a braindump and get your brain functioning! Like I said, I'm not about to baby you.

I already gave you the answer 2 times over for your ridgid stupid example of an oil filter.

We are talking of a gas, therefore you have to have examples of dynamic fluids/gases. What the hell does a ridgid component have to do with anything in the CO2 debate.

Stick to being a mushroom fearmongers and the 'what do we do' crowd.

wow, someone never ever ever learnt metaphors. Talk about an idiot!! Grin

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: OOOPPPS
Reply #91 - May 31^st, 2011 at 4:39pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on May 31^st, 2011 at 4:37pm:

progressiveslol wrote on May 31^st, 2011 at 4:36pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on May 31^st, 2011 at 4:33pm:

progressiveslol wrote on May 31^st, 2011 at 4:32pm:

A non-answer is still a non-answer no matter the spin.

All you are talking about is co-operation and components. You cant give examples on a gas as if to talk about countries co-operations. You are in the wrong debate with me if you want me to do the guess work.

You need to stick with the 'what action and co-opertation do we do' crowd.

It's more fun to be in your crowd considering there are literally only a handful of you "geniuses" left. Read the edit on my reply. And from there, like I said, formulate a braindump and get your brain functioning! Like I said, I'm not about to baby you.

I already gave you the answer 2 times over for your ridgid stupid example of an oil filter.

We are talking of a gas, therefore you have to have examples of dynamic fluids/gases. What the hell does a ridgid component have to do with anything in the CO2 debate.

Stick to being a mushroom fearmongers and the 'what do we do' crowd.

wow, someone never ever ever learnt metaphors. Talk about an idiot!! Grin

Well wrong metaphor fool and wrong debate. It is like talking to deadhorse with you sometimes.

Back to top

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: OOOPPPS
Reply #92 - May 31^st, 2011 at 4:41pm

progressiveslol wrote on May 31^st, 2011 at 4:39pm:

Well wrong metaphor fool and wrong debate. It is like talking to deadhorse with you sometimes.

Idiot, if you can't comprehend how the metaphor between an oil filter being a small component in a big picture that can cause the big picture to collapse and australia as a small sub system in the world system, then you are a complete and utter wonk. Seriously mate, go back, get some actual education, stop pretending to be something you're not and understand where to get your information from. The fact you are still trying to debate an argument the country has left behind over 12 months ago goes to say something about your complete and utter stupidity. What a complete and utter nuff. Grin

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: OOOPPPS
Reply #93 - May 31^st, 2011 at 4:50pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on May 31^st, 2011 at 4:41pm:

progressiveslol wrote on May 31^st, 2011 at 4:39pm:

Well wrong metaphor fool and wrong debate. It is like talking to deadhorse with you sometimes.

Idiot, if you can't comprehend how the metaphor between an oil filter being a small component in a big picture that can cause the big picture to collapse and australia as a small sub system in the world system, then you are a complete and utter wonk. Seriously mate, go back, get some actual education, stop pretending to be something you're not and understand where to get your information from. The fact you are still trying to debate an argument the country has left behind over 12 months ago goes to say something about your complete and utter stupidity. What a complete and utter nuff. Grin

It is ridgid, you cant use it. The only thing ridgid in YOUR debate is a country.

I am talking about 100% of global carbon output, of which, humans expell 3%. That leaves 97% of dynamic output of CO2. 3% is not of significance against 97% of dynamic CO2 expulsion.

Take out Australia's 1.4% of the 3% or even the 3% (the entire human expulsion of CO2) of human CO2 expulsion and you still end up with a statistical insignificant number compared to the 97% of DYNAMIC environmental CO2 expulsion.

The human caused climate change does not stack up.

Now make an example on how the 3% entire human expulsion of CO2 is a significant factor within the 97% being expelled dynamically by the environment.

Back to top

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: OOOPPPS
Reply #94 - May 31^st, 2011 at 4:54pm

progressiveslol wrote on May 31^st, 2011 at 4:50pm:

It is ridgid, you cant use it. The only thing ridgid in YOUR debate is a country.

I am talking about 100% of global carbon output, of which, humans expell 3%. That leaves 97% of dynamic output of CO2. 3% is not of significance against 97% of dynamic CO2 expulsion.

Take out Australia's 1.4% of the 3% or even the 3% (the entire human expulsion of CO2) of human CO2 expulsion and you still end up with a statistical insignificant number compared to the 97% of DYNAMIC environmental CO2 expulsion.

The human caused climate change does not stack up.

Now make an example on how the 3% entire human expulsion of CO2 is a significant factor within the 97% being expelled dynamically by the environment.

Nice to see you are completely ignoring what I'm saying and you go right back to the same bullcrap you spur. No problems.
Grin

What a complete moron. Not even worth the time.

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged