Australian Politics Forum - Climate science audit slams deniers

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Climate science audit slams deniers
Reply #75 - May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:00pm

progressiveslol wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 9:58pm:

You wish buddy. I know you are happy with all your little mushrooms that follow a failed science, but the Australian people want answers, and they are still debating against your wishes of mushroomville.

Maybe in your house, but the majority of Aussies have moved on and understand the need for climate change action. If it wasn't so we'd have a mainstream party, the Libs, representing that belief. Too bad they aren't.

Grin

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Climate science audit slams deniers
Reply #76 - May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:00pm

mozzaok wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 9:56pm:

Quote:

Just like their forefathers, who shut up about their vile opposition to civil rights, women's rights, slavery, and so on.

Alevine

Excellent point Alevine, and the wackos around today, who still oppose those things you listed are very much of the lunatic fringe type, and the most extreme and strident of the AGW denialists will hold onto their silly ideas, and take their position on that lunatic fringe with those others of their kind.

Excellent point from someone who would use the race card or sexism card. You are see through.

Back to top

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Climate science audit slams deniers
Reply #77 - May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:01pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 9:58pm:

progressiveslol wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 9:53pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 9:00pm:

progressiveslol wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 8:47pm:

Guildford wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 8:34pm:

This document is produced for general information only and does not represent a statement of the policy of the Commonwealth of Australia. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy, completeness and reliability of the material contained in this
document,the Commonwealth of Australia and all persons acting for the Commonwealth preparing this report accept noliability for the
accuracy of or inference.

So its a useless document. Could be full of errors, of which should not be relied upon.

Did you already forget that the argument for whether man-made climate change is real or not is over? My nuffy friend, no matter what you wish to debate just understand that there will be action, one way or another.

How could I forget, your debating it right now lol nuff nut.

I am happy to see the debate is live and well in Australia.

Actually no. I'm not debating it at all. I'm saying there is no point debating it. Not trying to convince you or prove that my belief in man-made climate change is correct. Grin

I'm saying we are past this and you are, as per usual, stuck in the past.

Maybe the pigeon with your latest edition of the newspaper got eaten? Both parties have a climate change policy. Both will enact their policy. Your cause is lost. No more point debating it, you nonsensical nuff nuff Grin

Well move along then. I am doing what I want to do.

Back to top

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 23619 Gender:	Re: Climate science audit slams deniers Reply #78 - May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:03pm progressiveslol wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:01pm: Well move along then. I am doing what I want to do. Trying to relive 2009/2010? My nuff friend, I know you like to stand still and sometimes walk backwards, but seriously, it's time to move along.
Back to top	Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of. IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 23619 Gender:	Re: Climate science audit slams deniers Reply #79 - May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:05pm progressiveslol wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:00pm: Excellent point from someone who would use the race card or sexism card. You are see through. Why is it that those who actually are racist, bigots or sexist get so upset about being called on it? You are what you are. Live with it and accept it.
Back to top	Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of. IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Climate science audit slams deniers
Reply #80 - May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:08pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:05pm:

progressiveslol wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:00pm:

Excellent point from someone who would use the race card or sexism card. You are see through.

Why is it that those who actually are racist, bigots or sexist get so upset about being called on it?

You are what you are. Live with it and accept it.

My point exactly. Too quick my boy, too see through.

Back to top

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 23619 Gender:	Re: Climate science audit slams deniers Reply #81 - May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:10pm progressiveslol wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:08pm: My point exactly. Too quick my boy, too see through. Now resorting to not making sense? Not a good thing to back up an argument...but ok.
Back to top	Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of. IP Logged

Maqqa

Gold Member

Offline

14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000

Re: Climate science audit slams deniers
Reply #82 - May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:19pm

perceptions_now wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 8:28pm:

I have said many times that a Carbon tax (either Labor or Liberal) or an ETS will not fix the Climate problems, they are all tax revenue & profit related.

That said, Garnaut & Stern are both Economists and both take the view, as do many others, that action taken to mitigate Climate risks, particularly if taken early, is likely to be much effective, both from an Economic & Climate perspective!

CLIMATE RISK?

Much more effective based on what? OBSERVATIONAL SCIENCE?

Back to top

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Climate science audit slams deniers
Reply #83 - May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:21pm

Maqqa wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:19pm:

perceptions_now wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 8:28pm:

I have said many times that a Carbon tax (either Labor or Liberal) or an ETS will not fix the Climate problems, they are all tax revenue & profit related.

That said, Garnaut & Stern are both Economists and both take the view, as do many others, that action taken to mitigate Climate risks, particularly if taken early, is likely to be much effective, both from an Economic & Climate perspective!

CLIMATE RISK?

Much more effective based on what? OBSERVATIONAL SCIENCE?

Shouldn't you be spending your time trying to work out what the CPRS is?

Grin

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

Maqqa

Gold Member

Offline

14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000

Re: Climate science audit slams deniers
Reply #84 - May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:24pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:21pm:

Maqqa wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:19pm:

perceptions_now wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 8:28pm:

I have said many times that a Carbon tax (either Labor or Liberal) or an ETS will not fix the Climate problems, they are all tax revenue & profit related.

That said, Garnaut & Stern are both Economists and both take the view, as do many others, that action taken to mitigate Climate risks, particularly if taken early, is likely to be much effective, both from an Economic & Climate perspective!

CLIMATE RISK?

Much more effective based on what? OBSERVATIONAL SCIENCE?

Shouldn't you be spending your time trying to work out what the CPRS is?

Grin

I told you alevine

admit you are an idiot about these things and I'll explain it to you

Back to top

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Climate science audit slams deniers
Reply #85 - May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:25pm

Maqqa wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:24pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:21pm:

Maqqa wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:19pm:

perceptions_now wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 8:28pm:

I have said many times that a Carbon tax (either Labor or Liberal) or an ETS will not fix the Climate problems, they are all tax revenue & profit related.

That said, Garnaut & Stern are both Economists and both take the view, as do many others, that action taken to mitigate Climate risks, particularly if taken early, is likely to be much effective, both from an Economic & Climate perspective!

CLIMATE RISK?

Much more effective based on what? OBSERVATIONAL SCIENCE?

Shouldn't you be spending your time trying to work out what the CPRS is?

Grin

I told you alevine

admit you are an idiot about these things and I'll explain it to you

Already told you: I will when you explain it.

Now, enough hiding. IN YOUR OWN WORDS, what is the CPRS, in detail, please?

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

perceptions_now

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth WA
Gender: male

Re: Climate science audit slams deniers
Reply #86 - May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:31pm

Maqqa wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:19pm:

perceptions_now wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 8:28pm:

I have said many times that a Carbon tax (either Labor or Liberal) or an ETS will not fix the Climate problems, they are all tax revenue & profit related.

That said, Garnaut & Stern are both Economists and both take the view, as do many others, that action taken to mitigate Climate risks, particularly if taken early, is likely to be much effective, both from an Economic & Climate perspective!

CLIMATE RISK?

Much more effective based on what? OBSERVATIONAL SCIENCE?

Between you and the "laughingprogressive", you both really don't have any understanding of what's going on now, nor what the likely scenario's are!

Your line of thinking or not thinking (which is more accurate), would likely result in the complete destruction of humanity, certainly the humanity that we now know!

You are both certifiable idiots!

Back to top

IP Logged

Maqqa

Gold Member

Offline

14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000

Re: Climate science audit slams deniers
Reply #87 - May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:36pm

perceptions_now wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:31pm:

Maqqa wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:19pm:

perceptions_now wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 8:28pm:

I have said many times that a Carbon tax (either Labor or Liberal) or an ETS will not fix the Climate problems, they are all tax revenue & profit related.

That said, Garnaut & Stern are both Economists and both take the view, as do many others, that action taken to mitigate Climate risks, particularly if taken early, is likely to be much effective, both from an Economic & Climate perspective!

CLIMATE RISK?

Much more effective based on what? OBSERVATIONAL SCIENCE?

Between you and the "laughingprogressive", you both really don't have any understanding of what's going on now, nor what the likely scenario's are!

Your line of thinking or not thinking (which is more accurate), would likely result in the complete destruction of humanity, certainly the humanity that we now know!

You are both certifiable idiots!

destruction of humanity? Cheesy

You can't even tell the rest of us in percentage terms how much carbon humans emit

Back to top

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number

IP Logged

Maqqa

Gold Member

Offline

14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000

Re: Climate science audit slams deniers
Reply #88 - May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:37pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:25pm:

Maqqa wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:24pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:21pm:

Maqqa wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:19pm:

perceptions_now wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 8:28pm:

I have said many times that a Carbon tax (either Labor or Liberal) or an ETS will not fix the Climate problems, they are all tax revenue & profit related.

That said, Garnaut & Stern are both Economists and both take the view, as do many others, that action taken to mitigate Climate risks, particularly if taken early, is likely to be much effective, both from an Economic & Climate perspective!

CLIMATE RISK?

Much more effective based on what? OBSERVATIONAL SCIENCE?

Shouldn't you be spending your time trying to work out what the CPRS is?

Grin

I told you alevine

admit you are an idiot about these things and I'll explain it to you

Already told you: I will when you explain it.

Now, enough hiding. IN YOUR OWN WORDS, what is the CPRS, in detail, please?

You've got to have skin in the game alevine

Back to top

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 23619 Gender:	Re: Climate science audit slams deniers Reply #89 - May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:42pm Maqqa wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:37pm: You've got to have skin in the game alevine I'll take that as your admission that you have NO IDEA what the CPRS was about. Just goes to show that you are just a simple fool who will argue for a cause you don't even understand or care to understand.
Back to top	Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of. IP Logged