Australian Politics Forum - Climate science audit slams deniers

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Climate science audit slams deniers
Reply #30 - May 23^rd, 2011 at 12:25pm

progressiveslol wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 12:22pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 12:19pm:

progressiveslol wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 12:08pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 11:04am:

I don't know why we keep having this argument? It's clear that for muppets like progessiveslol no amount of studies will be enough to stop their blind denial, and persistence to ignore for the sake of their own greed.

Likewise, so what you gonna do. Back to the he said she said, well bring it on.

Nope, I'm just going to go about my normal life, accept that climate change policy will be enacted, and ignore foolish nuffs nuffs like you. Because your song has simply become old and frustrated.

Thats another likewise. Maybe now you may get the time to challenge the establishment at your church.

Oh Great

Good to see that you accept climate change policy will be enacted.

Don't go getting too upset about it. Grin

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

chicken_lipsforme

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7090
Townsville NQ
Gender: male

Re: Climate science audit slams deniers
Reply #31 - May 23^rd, 2011 at 1:09pm

Soren wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 12:21pm:

astro_surf wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 9:02am:

Commission chairman Tim Flannery

Did you believe Timmy in 2005 when he prophesied that Sydney's dams might run dry by 2007?

Climate change 'will prolong' drought conditions
Last Update: Saturday, June 11, 2005. 6:47am

Leading environmentalist Professor Tim Flannery has warned that Australia is now entering long-term climate change, which could cause longer and more frequent droughts.

He also predicts that the ongoing drought could leave Sydney's dams dry in just two years.

Professor Flannery, who is the director of the South Australian Museum, has told ABC TV's Lateline that global warming is threatening Australia's chance of returning to a regular rainfall pattern.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200506/s1389858.htm

Good news actually, as this obviously then means that Australia will be returning to a regular rainfall pattern sooner rather than later.
Anything Flannery states needs to be taken with a grain of salt, because Australia's leading environmentalist has had zero luck in his prediction making.
He needs to get some new cats intestines, the old ones are off.

Back to top

"Another boat, another policy failure from the Howard government"

Julia Gillard
Shadow Health Minister
2003.

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Climate science audit slams deniers
Reply #32 - May 23^rd, 2011 at 1:22pm

chicken_lipsforme wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 1:09pm:

Soren wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 12:21pm:

astro_surf wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 9:02am:

Commission chairman Tim Flannery

Did you believe Timmy in 2005 when he prophesied that Sydney's dams might run dry by 2007?

Climate change 'will prolong' drought conditions
Last Update: Saturday, June 11, 2005. 6:47am

Leading environmentalist Professor Tim Flannery has warned that Australia is now entering long-term climate change, which could cause longer and more frequent droughts.

He also predicts that the ongoing drought could leave Sydney's dams dry in just two years.

Professor Flannery, who is the director of the South Australian Museum, has told ABC TV's Lateline that global warming is threatening Australia's chance of returning to a regular rainfall pattern.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200506/s1389858.htm

Good news actually, as this obviously then means that Australia will be returning to a regular rainfall pattern sooner rather than later.
Anything Flannery states needs to be taken with a grain of salt, because Australia's leading environmentalist has had zero luck in his prediction making.
He needs to get some new cats intestines, the old ones are off.

Flannery is just a scaremonger, fearmonger, scare campaigner.

Back to top

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Climate science audit slams deniers
Reply #33 - May 23^rd, 2011 at 1:23pm

skippy. wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:03am:

Wally wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:02am:

Who do you believe - Climate scientists, politicians, journalists or Christopher Monckton ?

The confusionalists here, like cods and co would believe Monkton,nuf said I know.

lol... well said from the resident.. ignoramus..

strangely enough I believe in my own commonsense.

who do you believe skippy????????.. apart from Al Gore of course..

I mean it is all about" WHO YOU BELIEVE ISNT IT"???.

your no scientist anymore than I am...so we are at the mercy of someone else..or at least you are..

I look at the conflicting evidence! and yes there is a lot of conflict it isnt all cut and dried as some would have it..

so I then look at Mother Nature.. whom most believers dont believe in, and my money is still on her. I am afraid..

I dont know what confusionalist about that.......you might wish to explain if you can.

Back to top

IP Logged

skippy.

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 20882
Gender: male

Re: Climate science audit slams deniers
Reply #34 - May 23^rd, 2011 at 1:27pm

cods wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 1:23pm:

skippy. wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:03am:

Wally wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:02am:

Who do you believe - Climate scientists, politicians, journalists or Christopher Monckton ?

The confusionalists here, like cods and co would believe Monkton,nuf said I know.

lol... well said from the resident.. ignoramus..

strangely enough I believe in my own commonsense.

who do you believe skippy????????.. apart from Al Gore of course..

I mean it is all about" WHO YOU BELIEVE ISNT IT"???.

your no scientist anymore than I am...so we are at the mercy of someone else..or at least you are..

I look at the conflicting evidence! and yes there is a lot of conflict it isnt all cut and dried as some would have it..

so I then look at Mother Nature.. whom most believers dont believe in, and my money is still on her. I am afraid..

I dont know what confusionalist about that.......you might wish to explain if you can.

You define confusionalist in every post you make cods. Cheesy

Back to top

freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL
Click onWWW below

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Climate science audit slams deniers
Reply #35 - May 23^rd, 2011 at 1:27pm

Soren wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 12:24pm:

Total available storage as at 3pm Thursday, 19 May 2011 is 73.8%, a decrease of 0.3% since last Thursday.

http://www.sca.nsw.gov.au/dams-and-water/weekly-storage-and-supply-reports/2012/...

SO now it's inundation scare from Timmy.

AGW - the disaster scenario that keeps giving, no matter what actually happens. Brilliant.

what I dont get soren is that if we ask questions... which I think are quite reasonable....we get the name calling the ridicule.I was even accused of not giving a damn about my grandchildren.this goes back to those years on yahoo... yet here we are years later and nothing has changed for all the mudslinging... not a thing is any different....

all thats changes are the goal post keep getting moved further apart... now its 2020/50..

instead of 2013/15

Back to top

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: Climate science audit slams deniers
Reply #36 - May 23^rd, 2011 at 1:27pm

chicken_lipsforme wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 1:09pm:

Soren wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 12:21pm:

astro_surf wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 9:02am:

Commission chairman Tim Flannery

Did you believe Timmy in 2005 when he prophesied that Sydney's dams might run dry by 2007?

Climate change 'will prolong' drought conditions
Last Update: Saturday, June 11, 2005. 6:47am

Leading environmentalist Professor Tim Flannery has warned that Australia is now entering long-term climate change, which could cause longer and more frequent droughts.

He also predicts that the ongoing drought could leave Sydney's dams dry in just two years.

Professor Flannery, who is the director of the South Australian Museum, has told ABC TV's Lateline that global warming is threatening Australia's chance of returning to a regular rainfall pattern.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200506/s1389858.htm

Good news actually, as this obviously then means that Australia will be returning to a regular rainfall pattern sooner rather than later.
Anything Flannery states needs to be taken with a grain of salt, because Australia's leading environmentalist has had zero luck in his prediction making.
He needs to get some new cats intestines, the old ones are off.

I have great respect for Tim Flannery.......in the fields of mammalogy and palaeontology..which he has training and qualification in.....as for climate activism......well not so much

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Climate science audit slams deniers
Reply #37 - May 23^rd, 2011 at 1:32pm

Something all deniers should realise:

Neither the opposition nor government are saying that climate change is not real. Both have a policy on how to deal with it, and both are aiming for 5% cuts. The question or the debate at hand is HOW BEST to deal with it: a carbon tax or direct action; and which of these is cheaper.

So enough sitting around whining that it's all made up. Realise that everyone has moved on.

Cheers.

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

Wally New Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 13	Re: Climate science audit slams deniers Reply #38 - May 23^rd, 2011 at 1:35pm progressiveslol wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:03am: Wally wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:02am: Who do you believe - Climate scientists, politicians, journalists or Christopher Monckton ? I dont understand why you ask about groups, then lump one name of one person? oops, sorry, I will add Alan Jones. hehe
Back to top	IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: Climate science audit slams deniers
Reply #39 - May 23^rd, 2011 at 1:35pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 1:32pm:

Something all deniers should realise:

Neither the opposition nor government are saying that climate change is not real. Both have a policy on how to deal with it, and both are aiming for 5% cuts. The question or the debate at hand is HOW BEST to deal with it: a carbon tax or direct action; and which of these is cheaper.

So enough sitting around whining that it's all made up. Realise that everyone has moved on.

Cheers.

Alevine......even 'deniers' agree that climate change is real......It's MAN-CAUSED climate change that we are sceptical about...

And they ARE very different things..

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Climate science audit slams deniers
Reply #40 - May 23^rd, 2011 at 1:40pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 1:35pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 1:32pm:

Something all deniers should realise:

Neither the opposition nor government are saying that climate change is not real. Both have a policy on how to deal with it, and both are aiming for 5% cuts. The question or the debate at hand is HOW BEST to deal with it: a carbon tax or direct action; and which of these is cheaper.

So enough sitting around whining that it's all made up. Realise that everyone has moved on.

Cheers.

Alevine......even 'deniers' agree that climate change is real......It's MAN-CAUSED climate change that we are sceptical about...

And they ARE very different things..

And the government and opposition both support that man-caused climate change is real, considering they BOTH have a policy to deal with it.

So again, conservatives need to take a deep breath, realise that no amount of whining is going to change the fact that either main party will enact action.

Poor progessiveslol Sad

I hope the period of change doesn't impact you like the introduction of cars and computers did... Grin

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Climate science audit slams deniers
Reply #41 - May 23^rd, 2011 at 1:41pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 1:32pm:

Something all deniers should realise:

Neither the opposition nor government are saying that climate change is not real. Both have a policy on how to deal with it, and both are aiming for 5% cuts. The question or the debate at hand is HOW BEST to deal with it: a carbon tax or direct action; and which of these is cheaper.

So enough sitting around whining that it's all made up. Realise that everyone has moved on.

Cheers.

The debate is what I say the debate is. Thanks anyway.

Back to top

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Climate science audit slams deniers
Reply #42 - May 23^rd, 2011 at 1:43pm

Wally wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 1:35pm:

progressiveslol wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:03am:

Wally wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 10:02am:

Who do you believe - Climate scientists, politicians, journalists or Christopher Monckton ?

I dont understand why you ask about groups, then lump one name of one person?

oops, sorry, I will add Alan Jones. hehe

Not enough. Add some climate scientists like Robert Carter and others.

How about you add the oh my god non-credible scientists.

Back to top

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Climate science audit slams deniers
Reply #43 - May 23^rd, 2011 at 1:43pm

progressiveslol wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 1:41pm:

The debate is what I say the debate is. Thanks anyway.

Actually no. the debate has moved on to how BEST to deal with Climate change. Not whether man-made climate change is real or not.

I know you like to live in the past, but seriously move on.

And on that note, for someone who is so intent on bringing back the 1920's, why use modern items? Go back to that era yourself! Lose your car. Lose your computer. and live life like you wish it be.

Grin

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Climate science audit slams deniers
Reply #44 - May 23^rd, 2011 at 1:45pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 1:43pm:

progressiveslol wrote on May 23^rd, 2011 at 1:41pm:

The debate is what I say the debate is. Thanks anyway.

Actually no. the debate has moved on to how BEST to deal with Climate change. Not whether man-made climate change is real or not.

I know you like to live in the past, but seriously move on.

And on that note, for someone who is so intent on bringing back the 1920's, why use modern items? Go back to that era yourself! Lose your car. Lose your computer. and live life like you wish it be.

Grin

Actually no. The debate is what I say the debate is.

Back to top

IP Logged