Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
Dawn of a new geological epoch (Read 5213 times)
astro_surf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2981
Re:  Dawn of a new geological epoch
Reply #30 - May 28th, 2011 at 1:17am
 
Bobby. wrote on May 26th, 2011 at 11:54pm:
Nice post Astro but it totally disagrees with this:

http://www.sp@m.com/living/carbon-credit-hoax/question-1576139/


Yes, but that's because your random soda head article is wrong, completely wrong. Humans emit far more CO2 than volcanoes and even if one volcano did emit a particularly large amount it would be statistically insignificant over the minimum thirty year window in which climate is measured.
Back to top
 

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Sep 11th, 2011 at 11:23am:
So tell me, you'd like to see more and more craphouse coloured people in Australia right?&&Yeah good idea moron.&&
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Moderator
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 122490
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re:  Dawn of a new geological epoch
Reply #31 - May 29th, 2011 at 10:55am
 
astro_surf wrote on May 28th, 2011 at 1:17am:
Bobby. wrote on May 26th, 2011 at 11:54pm:
Nice post Astro but it totally disagrees with this:

http://www.sp@m.com/living/carbon-credit-hoax/question-1576139/


Yes, but that's because your random soda head article is wrong, completely wrong. Humans emit far more CO2 than volcanoes and even if one volcano did emit a particularly large amount it would be statistically insignificant over the minimum thirty year window in which climate is measured.


I just wanted to show you that there are 2 sides to this debate & the
amounts of CO2 are really a point of contention.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
astro_surf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2981
Re:  Dawn of a new geological epoch
Reply #32 - May 29th, 2011 at 1:24pm
 
Bobby. wrote on May 29th, 2011 at 10:55am:
I just wanted to show you that there are 2 sides to this debate & the
amounts of CO2 are really a point of contention.



If by "contention" you mean "scientists say one thing, anonymous cranks on the internet who don't know what they are talking about say something else", then yeah I guess you're right. In the real world however it is not a mater of contention at all, we know precisely how much CO2 the Icelandic volcano emitted and it was less than 0.01% of what humans will emit this year.
Back to top
 

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Sep 11th, 2011 at 11:23am:
So tell me, you'd like to see more and more craphouse coloured people in Australia right?&&Yeah good idea moron.&&
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Moderator
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 122490
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re:  Dawn of a new geological epoch
Reply #33 - May 29th, 2011 at 1:45pm
 
astro_surf wrote on May 29th, 2011 at 1:24pm:
Bobby. wrote on May 29th, 2011 at 10:55am:
I just wanted to show you that there are 2 sides to this debate & the
amounts of CO2 are really a point of contention.



If by "contention" you mean "scientists say one thing, anonymous cranks on the internet who don't know what they are talking about say something else", then yeah I guess you're right. In the real world however it is not a mater of contention at all, we know precisely how much CO2 the Icelandic volcano emitted and it was less than 0.01% of what humans will emit this year.


Link please for proof of your statement?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
astro_surf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2981
Re:  Dawn of a new geological epoch
Reply #34 - May 29th, 2011 at 4:08pm
 
Bobby. wrote on May 29th, 2011 at 1:45pm:
]

Link please for proof of your statement?


http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5iFlK7AFMG1W1EKOCEcsMnheg0oow


Quote:
Volcano emitting 150-300,000 tonnes of CO2 daily: experts

(AFP) – Apr 19, 2010

PARIS — Iceland's Eyjafjoell volcano is emitting between 150,000 and 300,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2) per day, a figure placing it in the same emissions league as a small-to-medium European economy, experts said on Monday.

Assuming the composition of gas to be the same as in an earlier eruption on an adjacent volcano, "the CO2 flux of Eyjafjoell would be 150,000 tonnes per day," Colin Macpherson, an Earth scientist at Britain's University of Durham, said in an email.

Patrick Allard of the Paris Institute for Global Physics (IPGP) gave what he described as a "top-range" estimate of 300,000 tonnes per day.

Extrapolated over a year, the emissions would place the volcano 47th to 75th in the world table of emitters on a country-by-country basis, according to a database at the World Resources Institute (WRI), which tracks environment and sustainable development.

A 47th ranking would place it above Austria, Belarus, Portugal, Ireland, Finland, Bulgaria, Sweden, Denmark and Switzerland, according to this list, which relates to 2005.

Experts stressed that the volcano contributed just a tiny amount --
less than a third of one percentage point -- of global emissions of greenhouse gases.


Total emissions by six heat-trapping gases in 2005 were more than 36 thousand million tonnes (36 gigatonnes) as measured in CO2, according to the WRI index.
"It's not of any significance compared to the anthropogenic [manmade] budget," said Kjetil Toerseth, director of regional and global pollution at the Norwegian Institute for Air Research.

Specialists cautioned those who believe the eruption is good for climate change as carbon-emitting jetliners are unable to take to the skies.

According to the European Environment Agency (EAA), daily emissions from the aviation sector in the 27 nations of the European Union are around 440,000 tonnes per day.

Not all of this is saved because of the volcanic eruption, said the sources.

Firstly, some airports in southern Europe have remained open for traffic.

In addition, carbon is emitted when passengers stranded by air travel use the train, bus, car or ferry as an alternative.

And many flights in, to and from Europe are merely being deferred until the crisis is over.

"Whether the emissions occur now or three weeks from now does not change things fundamentally," said Herve Le Treut, a French climatologist.

"Another point is that these emissions are of long duration. CO2 is dangerous because it stays in the atmosphere for about a hundred years. Its short-term effect is not the big problem."


Back to top
 

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Sep 11th, 2011 at 11:23am:
So tell me, you'd like to see more and more craphouse coloured people in Australia right?&&Yeah good idea moron.&&
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Moderator
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 122490
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re:  Dawn of a new geological epoch
Reply #35 - May 29th, 2011 at 4:32pm
 
And yet it is the opposite of the link I gave.  Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
astro_surf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2981
Re:  Dawn of a new geological epoch
Reply #36 - May 30th, 2011 at 8:57am
 
Yes. Your link is a CHAIN EMAIL. It ISN'T true, it CONTRADICTS the science. Can you not tell the difference between scientific opinion and the opinion of some anonymous CHAIN EMAIL????
Back to top
 

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Sep 11th, 2011 at 11:23am:
So tell me, you'd like to see more and more craphouse coloured people in Australia right?&&Yeah good idea moron.&&
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Moderator
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 122490
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re:  Dawn of a new geological epoch
Reply #37 - May 30th, 2011 at 9:27am
 
astro_surf wrote on May 30th, 2011 at 8:57am:
Yes. Your link is a CHAIN EMAIL. It ISN'T true, it CONTRADICTS the science. Can you not tell the difference between scientific opinion and the opinion of some anonymous CHAIN EMAIL????



No I can't.
All links on the internet are suspect including yours.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print