Australian Politics Forum - Labor following Howards footsteps

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register

Forum rules, Recent posts (with text), RSS, Search options, Browse all uploaded images
Home, Articles, Green Tax Shift, Evolution,

Australian Politics Forum › General Discussion › Federal Politics › Labor following Howards footsteps

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Pages: 1 2 3

Labor following Howards footsteps (Read 7207 times)

Wattle Grove

Ex Member

Re: Labor following Howards footsteps
Reply #30 - May 8^th, 2011 at 9:25am

Maqqa wrote on May 8^th, 2011 at 9:18am:

buzzanddidj wrote on May 7^th, 2011 at 11:17pm:

John Howard was hated on MANY fronts
Though his

tar and feathering

, in 2007, was more based on

WorkChoices

Labor used his policies to demonised him

Now they are copying those very same policies that he was hated for

To the average Australian who voted for Labor this is nothing to be proud of

You were duped and Australia is worse off for it

SUCKED IN

macca you saying that labor is copying Howard policys and now we are worst off

So you finally amitted that Australia was worst off under Howard.

IP Logged

Maqqa

Gold Member

Offline

14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000

Re: Labor following Howards footsteps
Reply #31 - May 8^th, 2011 at 9:26am

Dnarever wrote on May 7^th, 2011 at 9:14pm:

[quote author=Maqqa link=1304757195/15#19 date=1304765717]

I think most people are capable of assessing what a fair amount of time to be held in detention for basic checks in terms of health and security would be.

i.e. weeks or maybe months but not years and case dependant.

I would not see that expecting people to have a modest perspective on what is reasonable without advice from me to be gutless in any way.

I would think it more a weak and lacking of intestines use of the word gutless.

So if it's CASE DEPENDENT then unless you know all the details of the case then how do you know what the issues are?

If it's case dependent then the "case information" would be kept a secret

We hear the "advocates" telling us that time is NOT FAIR but do they know the whole story?

We hear the lawyers from the advocate side telling us it's NOT FAIR but what are they going to say? We have lawyers advocating for murders so do we listen to the defending lawyers in this case and expect them to be impartial?

So there are NO information and yet you are able to determine a "fair amount of time" based on ZERO information!!

A Modest perspective? NO!!

Why? Because you are regurgitating rhetoric without making an assessment

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number

IP Logged

Maqqa

Gold Member

Offline

14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000

Re: Labor following Howards footsteps
Reply #32 - May 8^th, 2011 at 9:30am

Quote:

macca you saying that labor is copying Howard policys and now we are worst off

So you finally amitted that Australia was worst off under Howard.

I've already explained this years ago but I'll do it again for your benefit

Policies are like recipes

You have a 5-star chef (Costello) implementing the recipe compare it to a wannabe cook (Swan) butchering the recipes

Swan has butchered this economy to pieces

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number

IP Logged

Pages: 1 2 3

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

« Forum

‹ Board

Top of this page