Dependent spouse tax offset - income testsThe dependent spouse tax offset provides tax relief for personal circumstances. To be eligible for the offset you must meet specific criteria.
From the 2009-10 income year, the introduction of a new income test may affect your eligibility for this tax offset. You may no longer be eligible for the tax offset or only be entitled to a lesser amount.
In previous years, your taxable income and the separate net income of your spouse was used to assess your eligibility. From the 2009-10 income year your adjusted taxable income will be used. All other eligibility requirements remain unchanged.Your adjusted taxable income is the sum of the following amounts:
taxable income
adjusted fringe benefits (reportable fringe benefits x 0.535)
tax-free pensions or benefits
target foreign income (income from overseas not reported in your tax return)
reportable super contributions (includes both reportable employer superannuation contributions and deductible personal superannuation contributions)
total net investment loss (includes both net financial investment loss and net rental property loss)
less
child support you've paid.
For further information regarding child support you paid (deductible child maintenance expenditure), refer to the Family Assistance Guide.
For the 2009-10 income year, you will be eligible to claim a dependent spouse offset if all of the following apply:
your adjusted taxable income was $150,000 or less
your spouse's adjusted taxable income for the year was less than $9,254
you met all the following conditions:
you maintained your spouse
your spouse was an Australian resident
you were an Australian resident
neither you nor your spouse were eligible for family tax benefit Part B or were only eligible for it at a shared-care rate.The following example shows how the change in income tests affect eligibility for the dependent spouse tax offset.
Example 1
Toni and Brett are married. Toni works for a charity as a volunteer and is not in paid employment. They have rental properties and a share portfolio. Brett also has entered into a salary sacrificing arrangement to boost his super.
For the 2008-09 income year, Brett's taxable income was $120,000 (after claiming a rental loss of $17,000 and a financial investment loss of $8,000), and he had reportable employer superannuation contributions (salary sacrificed amount) of $10,000.
As Brett's taxable income was $120,000 and under the income threshold, he was eligible to claim the dependent spouse tax offset.
For the 2009-10 income year, Brett's financial situation remains similar. His taxable income is $120,000 (after claiming a total net investment loss of $20,000), and he has reportable super contributions of $15,000.
The income test for this offset has changed and Brett's adjusted taxable income is now used to calculate his eligibility for the offset. Brett's adjusted taxable income is $155,000.
$120,000 + $20,000 + $15,000 = $155,000.
As Brett's adjusted taxable income is over the income threshold for this offset he is not eligible to claim the dependent spouse tax offset.
Example 2
Tony and Dana are in a de-facto relationship. Dana is on unpaid leave. Tony wants to claim the dependent spouse tax offset for Dana in his 2009-10 income tax return.
While Dana has no salary or wage income, her employer has made $10,000 in reportable employer superannuation contributions for her during the 2009-10 income year.
As Dana had no other taxable income or fringe benefit amounts for the income year, her taxable income is nil, but her adjusted taxable income is $10,000. This is because reportable employer superannuation contributions are included in the income test.
Therefore, Tony is not eligible to claim the dependent spouse tax offset as Dana's adjusted taxable income is more than the dependent spouse income threshold of $9,254 for the 2009-10 income year.
More information
For more information, refer to Spouse (without dependent child or student), child-housekeeper or housekeeper.
http://www.ato.gov.au/content.asp?doc=/content/00216847.htmLast Modified: Monday, 12 July 2010
This is an example of mid-upper class WEALTHfare - which is counted outside usual welfare payments because it is paid as a so-called