If a person believes that God does not exist, are they an atheist?
This extraordinarily simple question with a yes/no answer has so perplexed and divided atheists that they have taken to refusing to answer it.
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1303676733This thread has gone to 21 pages so far and some are still holding out on giving an answer.
Muso, in a comparitively brave move, gave an answer upfront only 9 pages in:
muso wrote on Apr 26
th, 2011 at 5:31pm:
freediver wrote on Apr 26
th, 2011 at 2:42pm:
Helian and Grey, if a person believes that God does not exist, are they an atheist?
Why is this question so hard to answer?
I don't think it's hard to answer. At least I don't have any stake in the matter, so here goes.
A person who believes that Gods don't exist is an Atheist, however an Atheist is not necessarily a person who believes that Gods don't exist.
Can you follow that? It's like saying that a dog is an animal, but an animal is not necessarily a dog.
Sappho gave both answers, as is her wont, after first insisting the question is incomprehensible. At least she didn't accuse me of trickery in asking the question:
page 13:
Sappho wrote on Apr 27
th, 2011 at 10:40pm:
freediver wrote on Apr 27
th, 2011 at 9:32pm:
Helian, Grey and Sappho, if a person believes that God does not exist, are they an atheist?
To be honest... I just don't know... I don't know what it means to believe that god does not exist.
What does it mean to believe in things that don't exist?
Sappho wrote on Apr 28
th, 2011 at 7:37pm:
So again Freediver... would you do us the honour of explaining what the question actually means... unless of course... even you can't explain the meaning of the question... which your avoidance of an explanation seems to suggest.
page 15:
Sappho wrote on Apr 28
th, 2011 at 8:31pm:
In answer to your question.. "if a person believes that God does not exist, are they an atheist?"... no they would not be atheist. Atheism is not about belief in... it is about not believing in... it is not about an understanding of... it is about a lack of understanding.
page 18:
Sappho wrote on Apr 29
th, 2011 at 10:42pm:
freediver wrote on Apr 29
th, 2011 at 6:58pm:
Sappho wrote on Apr 28
th, 2011 at 10:28pm:
freediver wrote on Apr 28
th, 2011 at 10:00pm:
Quote: [quote]In answer to your question.. "if a person believes that God does not exist, are they an atheist?"... no they would not be atheist. Atheism is not about belief in... it is about not believing in... it is not about an understanding of... it is about a lack of understanding.
So what are they then?
Irrational fanatics... who also happen to be Atheist.
Interestingly, she also reserves the labels agnostic and atheist for herself, depending on what she is contempalting at the time:
Quote:When I define my position relative to Theism, I am Athiest. However, what exists or does not exist beyond Theism is unknown to me... so I neither believe nor disbelief... I remain Agnostic
Helian and Grey were the strongest holdouts, and also the two I originally directed the question at.
Grey eventually gave an answer on page 17, perhaps in fear of being left out once muso and Sappho had answered.
Grey wrote on Apr 29
th, 2011 at 9:38pm:
Quote:Helian and Grey, if a person believes that God does not exist, are they an atheist?
No, only eloquent people are allowed to be Atheists.
If a person knows that the belief they are believing doesn't exist they need a doctor.
In an argument reminiscent of witchcraft accusations, they accused me of a linguistic sleight of hand, though neither could follow through with a rational justification for this accusation, as it lead to another question they had trouble answering - do such people even exist? Grey thinks they are agnostics.
page 20:
Grey wrote on Apr 30
th, 2011 at 10:10am:
Quote:Do you 'reject' the existence of people who believe that God does not exist?
No. Not exactly, but it's a convoluted way of expressing agnosticism. Belief is inextricable from faith. Racism is a belief system. If you believe in god/gods you're not an atheist.
Helian on the other hand is still holding out, but occasionally asks me to skip a few steps ahead in the argument and keep going from there without knowing what happened in the middle.
So we have muso who responded with a quick and simple yes, Sappho who gave both yes and no depending on what she was contemplating at the time, Grey who said no on account of failing the eloquence criteria, and Helian who still refuses to answer on the grounds of linguistic trickery. We also have an interesting follow up question - do these people actually exist, and do they actually believe what they believe.