Equitist wrote on Apr 16
th, 2011 at 5:00pm:
I, for one, do not expect any nett cut in medical research funding
I certainly hope you're right. But if you are right, then why couldn't Penny Wong reassure listeners of Alan Jones' program on 2GB on Friday? The podcast is available to download - it's well worth listening to.
Quote:Which Senior Govt Ministers?
Of course the name of the source wasn't revealed. Otherwise by definition it would be an "announcement", not a "leak". Often governments will intentionally leak ideas for budget cuts before making a final decision on the scale of the cuts in order to gauge public sentiment.
Quote:When and where was this leaked?
As a new member of this forum, I don't think I'm allowed to post links. But you can find them in the News and Links section of the Discoveries Need Dollars website. Scroll down to the bottom to find the first published article citing the leaks:
14 March: An Adelaide Advertiser article "Brace for higher medicine costs" quotes a senior government figure as saying medical research is a "likely casualty" of federal budget cuts, with a $400 million cut to the NHMRC mooted.
Quote:Who is behind the campaign?
The campaign was initiated by the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research in Melbourne. Now scientists right across the country have joined the protests, together with patients desperately seeking advances in vaccines, treatments and cures.
Quote:I suspect that any purported 'cuts' would not come from the existing $750M budget - rather that there may be some cut into a projection of expected increased funding based on historical increases...
Any references discussing this further?
Quote:The claim is that there will be a 'cut' in spending of $400M over the next 3 years...
If the NMHRC (and those who rely upon it) had been banking on a funding increase of 10+% PA, then they might be in for some disappointment - but choosing not to incrementally increase an existing annual budget is not the same as cutting it...
Ideally, the NHMRC budget should be increased - only 20% of medical research projects deemed worthy of funding can be funded under the current system. But a refusal to increase funding by 10+% would certainly be better than a cut!
Cheers,
James