BigOl64 wrote on Apr 12
th, 2011 at 7:47am:
chicken_lipsforme wrote on Apr 12
th, 2011 at 7:41am:
cods wrote on Apr 12
th, 2011 at 7:37am:
chicken_lipsforme wrote on Apr 12
th, 2011 at 7:23am:
This is a smokescreen for the government to be seen to be doing 'something', even if it is totally unrelated to the current defense 'crisis'.
I just hope that the enemies our troops are sent off to kill in foreign lands are as politically correct as our government is, should any be captured in combat.
Perhaps the government could issue the Taliban with a nice glossy flyer in Employment Diversity and Equal Opportunity for Women.
More stupidity from Labor.
Israel has had women in the front line for yonks..as smith said they then will get to be the top jockey in the ADF...
wouldnt like to do it myself.. where women get the strength to just carry the gear is a mystery to me.
Israel certainly has had women in combat roles and for a few decades now, but Israel has never been one to send their combat troops to foreign lands on the other side of the globe.
Hey chook
Israel has female combantants as a matter of survival, not political expediency. Without the extra troops they would have quickly ceased to exist, we do not have that problem.
Back in '86 labor first brought out the anit-discrimination act, the RAAF had to change the way the trained recruits, no more separate courses for males and females. Simple enough, just make the course easy enough for females and the 'lesser' males can just slide through instead of being cut from the system.
We ended up with a bunch of males that should never have passed and in the past they would have been shiat canned, but after '86 they got though easy as.
Well they had to drop recruiting standards just to make up the numbers in all the services.
The relaxation of disciplinary standards during the eighties in the Navy Recruit School did the service no favours in the long run.
When I joined up in Jan 1975, nine others failed to make the grade for every one of us that that did make that intake.
I suspect quite a few that shouldn't have passed did by the time standards were lowered in the mid eighties.
The highlight for me was in the nineties with ships were to sail to the Arabian Gulf to enforce the embargo on Iraq, and that particular sailor crying and blubbering on the wharf at Garden Island to the media cameras because the girly man didn't want to go to sea for six months.
Absolutely disgusting affair, he must have thought he signed up on the 'Love Boat'.
And Labor's latest PC decision is merely a smoke screen in an attempt at deflection from the real issues.