Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 
Send Topic Print
Japan Nuclear Disaster-Bigger Than Chernobyl. (Read 17605 times)
Ex Dame Pansi
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 24168
Re: Japan Nuclear Disaster-Bigger Than Chernobyl.
Reply #150 - Apr 12th, 2011 at 3:39pm
 
<<2) After steadfastly refusing, for a whole month, that this was/is a really large problem, why move on the INES 7 admission NOW? >>
.....................................................................

Because they know they are in deep shite and had to start coming clean (no pun intended) sometime.
Back to top
 

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace." Hendrix
andrei said: Great isn't it? Seeing boatloads of what is nothing more than human garbage turn up.....
 
IP Logged
 
It_is_the_Darkness
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4000
in a ReTardis
Gender: male
Re: Japan Nuclear Disaster-Bigger Than Chernobyl.
Reply #151 - Apr 12th, 2011 at 3:48pm
 
There will be something said about the Nipponese (Japanese for the archaic Western imperialists) Nuclear Disaster being worse than Chernobyl tonight.
Back to top
 

SUCKING ON MY TITTIES, LIKE I KNOW YOU WANT TO.
 
IP Logged
 
Equitist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9632
NSW
Re: Japan Nuclear Disaster-Bigger Than Chernobyl.
Reply #152 - Apr 12th, 2011 at 4:17pm
 


It_is_the_Darkness wrote on Apr 12th, 2011 at 3:48pm:
There will be something said about the Nipponese (Japanese for the archaic Western imperialists) Nuclear Disaster being worse than Chernobyl tonight.




Huh!?
Back to top
 

Lamenting the shift in the Australian psyche, away from the egalitarian ideal of the fair-go - and the rise of short-sighted pollies, who worship the 'Growth Fairy' and seek to divide and conquer!
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: Japan Nuclear Disaster-Bigger Than Chernobyl.
Reply #153 - Apr 12th, 2011 at 9:53pm
 
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
It_is_the_Darkness
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4000
in a ReTardis
Gender: male
Re: Japan Nuclear Disaster-Bigger Than Chernobyl.
Reply #154 - Apr 12th, 2011 at 10:01pm
 
oops, I mean't upon the News-TV Embarrassed
Back to top
 

SUCKING ON MY TITTIES, LIKE I KNOW YOU WANT TO.
 
IP Logged
 
Equitist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9632
NSW
Re: Japan Nuclear Disaster-Bigger Than Chernobyl.
Reply #155 - Apr 17th, 2011 at 3:24pm
 


5 weeks and counting - and nowhere near under control...


http://blogs.forbes.com/oshadavidson/2011/04/16/conditions-may-be-deteriorating-...

Quote:
Conditions May Be Deteriorating at Japanese Nuclear Power Plant

Apr. 16 2011 - 2:58 pm

By OSHA GRAY DAVIDSON

Five weeks after the crisis at Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station (FDI) first began, there is new evidence that the situation may have taken a turn for the worse.

Intensely radioactive water from reactor Unit 2 is filling a nearby tunnel faster than workers can empty it, and radioactive levels of seawater near the plant increased sixfold following an aftershock on Saturday.

According to Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) owner/operator of the 6-reactor power plant, radioactive contamination of groundwater by Unit 2 is 17-times higher than it was just one week ago. The problem is thought to be caused by an unknown leak or leaks in the basement of the unit’s turbine building or in the tunnel itself.

A spokesman for Japan’s Nuclear and Industrial Safety Commission told reporters that “We want to determine the origin and contain the leak, but I must admit that tracking it down is difficult.”

On Friday, workers dumped more sandbags of zeolite, a radiation absorbing material, into the sea by Unit 3.

Radiation Threat to Marine Life

Little is known about the effects of radiation on marine life, despite a long history of such human-caused contamination from using the ocean as a dumping ground for nuclear waste from France, the U.K., and the former Soviet Union. An unknown amount of radiation also came from US nuclear weapons testing in the South Pacific. The explosion and fire at the only previous nuclear power disaster on this scale, at Chernobyl in 1986, deposited a significant amount of radiation in the ocean.

A recent article by journalist Elizabeth Grossman quotes Ken Buesseler, a senior scientist at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution:

    Given that the Fukushima nuclear power plant is on the ocean, and with leaks and runoff directly to the ocean, the impacts on the ocean will exceed those of Chernobyl, which was hundreds of miles from any sea….My biggest concern is the lack of information. We still don’t know the whole range of radioactive compounds that have been released into the ocean.

TEPCO moved 660 tons of radioactive water from the Unit 2 tunnel to a giant cask on Wednesday, lowering the water level in the tunnel by about three inches. By Saturday morning, however, the water level in the tunnel had returned to its previous position and then rose another inch.

Also, the Japanese public television network NHK reports that radiation in underground water is 38-times higher than it was a week ago.

How Far Away is Safe?

Despite assurances from the government that areas outside of designated evacuation zones are safe, debate continues over the safety of areas farther from the plant and when it will be safe for evacuees to return.

Part of the debate stems from the mixed signals sent by other nations. The U.S. told American nationals to evacuate from a 50-mile zone around FDI. France instructed its citizens to leave Japan entirely.

Changing instructions by the Japanese government itself is another factor contributing to confusion and alarm among the Japanese people.

An opinion piece published in yesterday’s Kyodo News is generating more debate on what actions need to be taken to deal with the nuclear crisis. The editorial was written by Alexey Yablokov, a Russian scientist who edited a book about the public health and environmental effects of the Chernobyl disaster.

“Based on Chernobyl experiences,” says Yablokov, “it is necessary to understand that it may be impossible to quickly get back to life before the catastrophe and to accept the post-Fukushima realities as soon as possible.”

His editorial includes suggestions such as expanding the exclusion zone around FDI to “at least” 30-miles, mass distribution of chemicals such as potassium iodine so that people can protect themselves against some forms of radiation, and the creation of a special government committee to deal exclusively with “problems of contaminated territories during the first most complicated years.”


Back to top
 

Lamenting the shift in the Australian psyche, away from the egalitarian ideal of the fair-go - and the rise of short-sighted pollies, who worship the 'Growth Fairy' and seek to divide and conquer!
 
IP Logged
 
Ex Dame Pansi
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 24168
Re: Japan Nuclear Disaster-Bigger Than Chernobyl.
Reply #156 - Apr 17th, 2011 at 4:44pm
 
It's extremely worrying equi. Remember the US said the damage was minimal with the BP oil leak, and after a couple of months the oil had dissipated into the sea bed or some such bull story. Now we find out that the effects are on going and much worse than they admitted.

I have a feeling this will be the same.....only worse, if there can be a worse.
Back to top
 

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace." Hendrix
andrei said: Great isn't it? Seeing boatloads of what is nothing more than human garbage turn up.....
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 
Send Topic Print