Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 35 36 37 38 39 ... 44
Send Topic Print
Fukushima - Consequences? (Read 102575 times)
Foolosophy
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1171
Australia
Gender: female
Re: Fukushima - Consequences?
Reply #540 - Apr 26th, 2011 at 1:34pm
 
On Japanese TV - 25th April 2011

Fukushima Playgrounds Limited To 1 Hour Use Per Day... Wash Hands & Gargle After Leaving!!!


Everything under control

Nothing to worry about - as long as you dont breathe, eat, drink or touch anything.

Meanwhile muso avoids any discussion of INTERNAL EMITTERS and their health dangers and prefers to continue ROLLING foreign turds up and down the incline whilst spreading nuclear industry and corporate propaganda and lies.

If it wasnt seriously pathetic it would be sublimely comedic

...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: Fukushima - Consequences?
Reply #541 - Apr 28th, 2011 at 9:22pm
 
Radiation Readings at Tepco Plant Rise to Highest in Crisis


April 27 (Bloomberg) -- Radiation readings at Japan’s Fukushima Dai-Ichi station rose to the highest since an earthquake and tsunami knocked out cooling systems, impeding efforts to contain the worst nuclear crisis since Chernobyl.

Two robots sent into the reactor No. 1 building at the plant yesterday took readings as high as 1,120 millisierverts of radiation per hour, Junichi Matsumoto, a general manager at Tokyo Electric Power Co., said today. That’s more than four times the annual dose permitted to nuclear workers at the stricken plant.

“Tepco must figure out the source of high radiation,” said Hironobu Unesaki, a nuclear engineering professor at Kyoto University. “If it’s from contaminated water leaking from inside the reactor, Tepco’s so-called water tomb may be jeopardized because flooding the containment vessel will result in more radiation in the building.”

The cores in reactors 1, 2 and 3 and the spent fuels rods in reactor 4 have been damaged.

Tepco started moving the radioactive water, which leaked to the basements and trenches, to a waste storage facility on April 19. Tepco transferred 1.89 million liters of the water from the trenches near reactor No. 2 as of 7 a.m. today, Iwamoto said. The utility plans to install a second pump after transferring 2.5 million liters.

Link -
http://noir.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=akyiw3CSzQgI
=====================
Just when you think, its safe to go back to the beach?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Foolosophy
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1171
Australia
Gender: female
Re: Fukushima - Consequences?
Reply #542 - Apr 28th, 2011 at 10:38pm
 
They can hide ALL they want

The radiation release will ruin Japan - and I am not just talking about their economic and financial structures

Look what has happened to Europe as a result of the Chernobyl disaster.

...

It's ALL OVER!

...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Fukushima - Consequences?
Reply #543 - Apr 29th, 2011 at 8:52am
 
Foolosophy wrote on Apr 28th, 2011 at 10:38pm:
They can hide ALL they want

The radiation release will ruin Japan - and I am not just talking about their economic and financial structures

Look what has happened to Europe as a result of the Chernobyl disaster.

http://bhavanajagat.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/radiation-map-chernobyl-disaster...


Why don't you superimpose a map of current radiation levels in Japan on the same scale as that map?   It would be an interesting exercise. Let me try. You can try it too.

Just as a reminder, this one is your map of Europe after Chernobyl:
...

and this one is Asia after Fukushima. The red area might be a bit exaggerated so that you can see it:
Back to top
« Last Edit: Apr 29th, 2011 at 9:04am by muso »  

Untitled_002.jpg (41 KB | 66 )
Untitled_002.jpg

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Foolosophy
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1171
Australia
Gender: female
Re: Fukushima - Consequences?
Reply #544 - Apr 29th, 2011 at 10:08am
 
Over 10 ^14 Bq/day STILL being released form Fukushima

And for 6 weeks the lies from TEPCO, the Japanese Authorities and International Nuclear Spin bodies such as the IAEA has been THERE IS NO DANGER - Level 4, level 5 now level 7 (all too late)

Reactor 3 spent fuel rod fuel explosion most likely a prompt criticality detonation type explosion

Plutonium and Uranium dust particles found in Hawaii, Canada and the USA.

Thousands of tonnes of radioactive water dumped and STILL being dumped into the ocean.

Ground water contaminated.

And there is NO DANGER?

Fukushima children limited to 1 hour play time at playgrounds each day and must clean all exposed skin, clothes and gargle afterwards

The Japanese Authorities have suddenly raised the same radiation exposure for children to that of ADULT NUCLEAR INDUSTRY WORKERS (lol)

Children's cell division is far higher than adults and their immune systems are stll being primed and developed.

The same radiation exposure for children will produce 10 to 100 times more cancers than in Adults

This is a cirminal decision purely based on limiting the financial damage to TEPCO and to the Japanese economy in general.

ANd I havent even talked about the severe health risks associated with internal radiological emitters such as Plutonium and Uranium etc

And all TEPCO can do is continue lying and annoucing a LIABILITY CAP for compensation - LOL - this  of course was to calm the markets and stop the plunge of their stock price.

10^14 Bq/day (after admiting that the figure they were publicising was 10 times smaller)

Estimates show that the release of radiation into the environment JUST in the first 3 days of this disaster was about 25% of the total Chernobyl release (Chernobyl released about 5.2 million TBq in its first 7 days before they were able to get the situatiuon under some sort of control)

Fukushima is still at risk of worsening and still spewing and leaking radiation.

Dont worry the media will be complicit in covering up everything in the WEST - there is JUST too much money and power involved

The CORPOCRACY MUST ALWAYS WIN - But will self-collapse in the end - ALL totalitarian fascist instruments self collapse in the end.

http://in.reuters.com/resources/r/m=02&d=20110413&t=2&i=386161847&w=460&fh=&fw=&ll=&pl=&r=img-2011-04-13T165236Z_01_NOOTR_RTRMDNC_0_India-562987-3
Back to top
« Last Edit: Apr 29th, 2011 at 10:14am by Foolosophy »  
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Fukushima - Consequences?
Reply #545 - Apr 29th, 2011 at 10:12am
 
By the way, the monitoring results carried out by the Japanese government (MEXT etc) is freely available on the net.  I haven't seen anything by Greenpeace yet.  Do their results contradict these readings?

(Please note for future reference that MBq/km2 is not the same as MBq/m2. )
Back to top
 

Untitled_003.jpg (225 KB | 57 )
Untitled_003.jpg

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Fukushima - Consequences?
Reply #546 - Apr 29th, 2011 at 10:17am
 
Foolosophy wrote on Apr 29th, 2011 at 10:08am:
Estimates show that the release of radiation into the environment JUST in the first 3 days of this disaster was about 25% of the total Chernobyl release (Chernobyl released about 5.2 million TBq in its first 7 days before they were able to get the situatiuon under some sort of control)


Chris Busby is also an excellent banjo player and he has great dress sense. That beret looks very smart on him  Wink

Did you like my map? Are you going to post one too?
Back to top
« Last Edit: Apr 29th, 2011 at 10:30am by muso »  

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Foolosophy
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1171
Australia
Gender: female
Re: Fukushima - Consequences?
Reply #547 - Apr 29th, 2011 at 10:45am
 
Radiation levels Not Detectable in JAPAN


...

Amazing how Iceland can detect Fukushima fallout, Hawaii has detected Plutonium and Uranium particles

But in JAPAN the levels are NOT DETECTABLE in almost every prefecture


...
Back to top
« Last Edit: Apr 29th, 2011 at 11:10am by Foolosophy »  
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Fukushima - Consequences?
Reply #548 - Apr 29th, 2011 at 10:52am
 
Foolosophy wrote on Apr 29th, 2011 at 10:45am:


Beautiful old instrument. Did you get that from your Greenpeace friends? I like your choice of colours and fonts too. Let me try:

Why is Greenpeace refusing to publish its radiation monitoring results on the net?


This guy is very Green. I think you should believe anything he says:

...
Back to top
« Last Edit: Apr 29th, 2011 at 10:58am by muso »  

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Foolosophy
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1171
Australia
Gender: female
Re: Fukushima - Consequences?
Reply #549 - Apr 29th, 2011 at 11:14am
 
JAPANESE INCREASE EXCLUSION ZONE TO 50km

BUT RADIATION LEVELS IN JAPAN ARE NON-DETECTABLE

...

...

...
Back to top
« Last Edit: Apr 29th, 2011 at 11:20am by Foolosophy »  
 
IP Logged
 
Foolosophy
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1171
Australia
Gender: female
Re: Fukushima - Consequences?
Reply #550 - Apr 29th, 2011 at 11:24am
 
A new analysis prepared for Greenpeace Germany by nuclear safety expert Dr Helmut Hirsch shows that by March 23 2011, Japan’s nuclear crisis has already released enough radioactivity to be ranked at Level 7 on the International Nuclear Event Scale (INES).



Greenpeace SPOT ON from the outset

I think we can totally IGNORE anything coming out of the mouths of the TEPCO criminals and their Japanese Government puppets.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Foolosophy
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1171
Australia
Gender: female
Re: Fukushima - Consequences?
Reply #551 - Apr 29th, 2011 at 11:28am
 
RADIOACTIVITY NON-DETECTABLE IN ALMOST ALL OF THE JAPANESE PREFECTURES

...

IT IS FORBIDDEN TO RELEASE DATA ON LEVELS OF ALPHA EMITTERS SUCH AS PLUTONIUM
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Foolosophy
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1171
Australia
Gender: female
Re: Fukushima - Consequences?
Reply #552 - Apr 29th, 2011 at 11:51am
 
...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Fukushima - Consequences?
Reply #553 - Apr 29th, 2011 at 2:16pm
 
Foolosophy wrote on Apr 29th, 2011 at 11:28am:

[size=24]
(wow! - big font! )
IT IS FORBIDDEN TO RELEASE DATA ON LEVELS OF ALPHA EMITTERS SUCH AS PLUTONIUM


Is that what Greenpeace claims? But why doesn't it release its  own monitoring data?

Come on, let's see all the Plutonium contamination reports by Greenpeace. Are they covering up the fact that they have detected Plutonium? - or perhaps they are covering up the fact that they didn't?

WHAT DOES GREENPEACE HAVE TO HIDE?

(size 24)

Quote:
Note: Chernobyl map is in kBq/ m2 - Fukushima monitoring results in MBq/km2 . 10,000 m2 in a km2.  1000kBq= 1 MBq

Conversion - 1000 kBq/m2 = 1 MBq/m2 = 10,000MBq/km2

The highest result on that table was 30MBq/km2 or 3kBq/m2, although results inside the exclusion zone are likely to be higher. 
Back to top
« Last Edit: Apr 29th, 2011 at 3:43pm by muso »  

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Fukushima - Consequences?
Reply #554 - Apr 29th, 2011 at 3:50pm
 
Here is an easier to read version of your Chernobyl map.
Back to top
 

chernobyl_001.jpg (187 KB | 72 )
chernobyl_001.jpg

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 35 36 37 38 39 ... 44
Send Topic Print