Foolosophy wrote on Mar 17
th, 2011 at 9:18pm:
The Arab league of nations have already recognised the right for ISrael to exist in the region - BUT to the original 1948 borders
The issue has always been about returning to pre 1967 annexing of Palestinian territory and the cesation of the occupation (ie settlements, illegal barriers, illegal blockades etc)
Israel is the NUMBER ONE violator of UN security council resolutions in the world - but of course any violations are supposed to be white washed form the history books due to the controlled US veto.
The settlement building is illegal under any international legal framework including the UN charters.
Its irrelevant whether Israel and its client state USA ignore its iligitimacy. That doesnt change the reality.
1948, 1967, 1973, etc, etc.
In the conflict that exists between Israel and her neighbours,
the moslem nations surrounding Israel have always been the belligerents, the aggressors.
Further, international law allows nations who are attacked [e.g. the state of Israel, 1948], to occupy and annex land that was previously recognised as being a part of another state [e.g. Arab states, 1948] because of aggression and attacks, upon a neighbouring state [Israel, 1948].
And international laws does not prohibit a state which was attacked [e.g. the state of Israel, 1948], from occupying and annexing the lands of an aggressor, so as to prevent further attacks.
BECAUSE;
"...the effect of such (a) prohibition would be to guarantee to all potential aggressors that, even if their aggression failed, all territory lost in the attempt would be automatically returned to them. Such a rule would be absurd to the point of lunacy.""
ISRAEL AND INTERNATIONAL LAW....Israel’s presence in all these areas pending negotiation of new borders
is entirely lawful, since Israel entered them lawfully in self-defence.
International law forbids acquisition by unlawful force, but not where, as in the case of Israel’s self-defence in 1967, the entry on the territory was lawful. It does not so forbid it,....for
the effect of such prohibition would be to guarantee to all potential aggressors that, even if their aggression failed, all territory lost in the attempt would be automatically returned to them. Such a rule would be absurd to the point of lunacy. There is no such rule..."
http://www.melaniephillips.com/diary/?p=1528+++
The world community needs to ask itself...
Why should Israel return the land it took in self defence, repulsing the ISLAMIC inspired aggression of local moslem states, when those states and peoples today, still declare, often openly, their enmity against the state of Israel???
Why should the belligerent moslem, and ISLAMIST peoples surrounding Israel be rewarded for their aggression???
It makes no sense to try to compel Israel to return those lands.
IMO, Israel should have immediately annexed that land, the land it
secured and
took, as a consequence of Arab/ISLAMIC aggression.
Israel
is the ancient homeland of the Jewish people.
And today, imo, Israel should be recognised by mankind as the homeland of the Jewish people.
+++
Foolosophy said,
"The Arab league of nations have already recognised the right for ISrael to exist in the region - BUT to the original 1948 borders..."
Insincere, sneeky, moslem
liars.
Whats new ?
Nothing under the sun.
Google;
mohammed treaty ofThe Treaty of Hudaibiya, details moslem treachery, and snakyness, towards those with whom moslems make agreements regarding the cessation of hostilities.
i.e.
When moslems are militarily weak, ISLAM counsels moslems to make a treaty, with your enemies.
When militarily strong again, BREAK you treaty with your enemies.
ISLAM, confirmed by the contents of the Koran, justifies
constant warfare against 'those who reject Faith'...
e.g.
1/ Koran 2.98 - "...Allah is an enemy to those who reject Faith." [i.e. 'Unbelief' is a crime.].
[ - - The enemy of moslems is identified. All of 'unbelieving' mankind, are the declared enemy of moslems.]
2/ Koran 47:8-11 - "...those who reject Allah have no protector."
[ - - Here, it is clearly stated to every good moslem, that moslem enmity, violence, and warfare, against 'those who reject Faith', is morally justified, and 'lawful'. /sarc off]
3/ Koran 4.74-76 - "...those who reject Faith Fight in the cause of Evil:..."
[ - - Those who reject 'Faith' are ipso facto, 'rightly' deemed as being innately evil by ISLAM, and by Allah. Therefore those who reject 'Faith', are the rightful targets of moslem enmity, violence, and warfare.
...'those who reject Faith' are also described [Koran 4.74-76], as 'oppressors' and as, 'the friends of Satan'.]
And the corollary of point #3, that, "...those who reject Faith Fight in the cause of Evil:...", is therefore point #1, "...Allah is an enemy to those who reject Faith.".