Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18
Send Topic Print
'Worst ever' property dive after disasters (Read 35875 times)
bridonta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 522
Re:  'Worst ever' property dive after disasters
Reply #210 - Mar 7th, 2011 at 12:17pm
 
how much will be paid for to repair. how much the FHOG  .. to boost up housing in such disaster zones ..??
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Re:  'Worst ever' property dive after disasters
Reply #211 - Mar 7th, 2011 at 12:34pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Mar 7th, 2011 at 11:58am:
Hi Lisa & Nail,
The high mortgages are ok if you're a lawyer on $350 an hour but for mere mortals
it represents a hell of a lot of money to come up with every month.


Bobby .. I don't know of any lawyer who charges $350/hr Bobby. Most seem to charge $600+.

Last Nail .. I'm still thinking about your last few posts.

Back to top
 

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 117629
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re:  'Worst ever' property dive after disasters
Reply #212 - Mar 7th, 2011 at 1:11pm
 
Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 7th, 2011 at 12:34pm:
Bobby. wrote on Mar 7th, 2011 at 11:58am:
Hi Lisa & Nail,
The high mortgages are ok if you're a lawyer on $350 an hour but for mere mortals
it represents a hell of a lot of money to come up with every month.


Bobby .. I don't know of any lawyer who charges $350/hr Bobby. Most seem to charge $600+.

Last Nail .. I'm still thinking about your last few posts.




You can get a lawyer for $350 an hour in Melbourne.
I think they're ripping you off in Sydney.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Ex Dame Pansi
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 24168
Re:  'Worst ever' property dive after disasters
Reply #213 - Mar 8th, 2011 at 1:41pm
 
Have you ever wondered why property investors just can’t bear to admit that house prices could fall?

I mean, ask any other investor and they’ll admit it’s possible for their favourite asset class to drop.

It doesn’t matter whether they’re share, gold, bond or art investors, every last man jack of them will say, “Prices can fall as well as rise.”

But not property investors.

Property prices always go up is their mantra.  Even in the face of evidence to the contrary, they still deny it.

Well, there’s a simple reason for their denial, which I’ll get to in a moment.  First, as we did a bit of channel hopping on Foxtel last night, we stumbled on Your Money, Your Call on Sky Business Channel.

Maybe, if we’re kind, we can see a few cracks in the property-always-goes-up-mantra.  Even so, it’s like drawing blood from a stone to get property experts to concede house prices may actually fall.

Even so, the wording is so cryptic that one of the experts admits there has been a price correction but not that prices have fallen.  Only in the world of property does a price correction involve prices going up!

The following is a transcript of the host, two property experts and Adam from Willoughby – a caller to the show:

Adam: “How much further do you think the property market could come off?  We have recently sold our property in Willoughby and we’ve taken over a 10% hit on our property… we had it valued last February and we recently sold it, in fact it’s over, a greater than 10% hit, and in some of the surrounding suburbs people are seeing in excess of 20-30% devaluations on their properties.  That probably hasn’t escaped to the press yet but it is significant, and in talking to a lot of… the real estate agents, they’ve only really got one buyer on most of these properties.  So I’m just wondering whether you have any view in terms of how far it could fall?”

Before we go on, we like Adam’s reference to reports of price falls not having “escaped to the press yet.”  Of course he should have said it “hasn’t escaped from the press yet.”

The press is just as keen as the property spruikers to keep price falls under wraps.  Even when they do run a prices-falling story, it’s soon followed by a prices-to-the-moon story – just to even things up.  But anyway, back to the show…

Host: “I don’t see any evidence of significant falls in the lower north shore of Sydney, what are your thoughts?”

Expert 1: “No, I do a lot of work in the lower north shore, a lot of work.  And in fact I had business in Willoughby and I was auctioning a couple of properties in Willoughby on… Saturday, and we didn’t sell one of them I grant you, but I have not personally seen a drop in the lower north shore.  We have experienced I believe a drop in the northern beaches area, but that’s probably been the case for the last three to four years.  What has happened, there has definitely been a slight correction, whilst I don’t think there has been a drop I think that the rapidity of the growth has certainly come off the boil a little, but the thing about Willoughby and those lower north shore areas – in my humble opinion – is that they are the most convenient spots in Sydney to get around.  They offer great lifestyles and really when you look at Willoughby for the size of the blocks that you get, the size of the homes you get, you compare them to the inner west or the inner east and they’re still very good value in Willoughby so I can see that the lower north shore will continue to go along OK, that’s my absolute thought on that one.”

Host: “Lisa Montgomery would you agree?  This goes back to the great variability you see in Sydney, particularly near the harbour.”

Expert 2: “Yeah, look I do agree.  And I think it’s interesting.  This is your family property you’ve just sold… if you’re going to be selling and buying, yes you might have lost a little bit in that correction but if you’re buying in the same market you may be able to pick up a little bit with that next purchase as well.  So, you know buying and selling in the same market is OK, it’s when you sell and you hold for some time that that correction could cause you some difficulty.”

Expert 1: “And Adam, you did use the word valuation and that’s not an exact science… I really have to say to my great friends out there who are valuers, you know it’s a very difficult job particularly in a market that is decreasing a little, we’re looking at valuations which are six to twelve weeks behind and is often trying to catch the tail up so, really I think valuations and particularly if they’re only estimates from agents, you’ve got to be very careful, you really do.”

For a start, buying and selling in the same market isn’t OK if you’ve made a loss.

A loss is a loss.  It doesn’t matter if the new property you’ve bought is cheaper, you’ve still made a loss on the property you’ve sold.  If you buy something for $1 and sell it for 50 cents, you’ve made a 50 cent loss… even if you buy something else for 50 cents.

And secondly, it’s a bit rich for a real estate guy to have a pop at valuers for getting house values wrong.

But anyway, as you know, financial advice and property spruikers don’t always go hand-in-hand.  As the following example shows.

Clear evidence of why property spruikers need prices to go up was in the “top tip” from property guru Chris Gray on his Sky Business Channel show last Friday:


cont.....
Back to top
 

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace." Hendrix
andrei said: Great isn't it? Seeing boatloads of what is nothing more than human garbage turn up.....
 
IP Logged
 
Ex Dame Pansi
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 24168
Re:  'Worst ever' property dive after disasters
Reply #214 - Mar 8th, 2011 at 1:44pm
 
“Before you buy an investment property you’ve got to work out your numbers beforehand.  So let’s just say you bought a typical $500,000 investment.  That should rent out at about $450 a week.  And that equates to about $22,500.

“Now let’s just assume you borrowed 100% of the funds at say 7% interest, that equates to $35,000 in mortgage repayments.  Now strata fees and other expenses are going to be about 1% of the property value, so that’s going to be about $5,000 a year.

“So if you add all those numbers up, a property of about $500,000 will cost you $15,000-$20,000 in cash flow.

“So why would you ever buy an investment that costs you money?  Well, if that property rises on average by five or ten per cent a year it’s going to rise by $25,000-$50,000 which means that your net return is anywhere from $10,000 to $40,000.  So the real key to making money from real estate is to cash flow it in the short-term and then you’ll make money in the long-term.”

There you have it.  Exactly as we’ve told you all along.  Property investors buy housing for one reason – capital growth.  The income to them is irrelevant apart from the fact that it helps reduce their annual expenses.

The fact is property investing involves losing money on a week-by-week basis in the hope – or gamble – that capital growth exceeds the costs.

Another way of looking at it is that when you buy a property all you’re doing is making a down payment… the first instalment if you like.  Then each year you have to make extra instalments – otherwise known as interest charges.

What that means is the purchase cost of the property is rising all the time.  The cost of the house keeps rising even if the value of the house stays the same or – heaven forbid – falls.

And don’t forget, most of these 100% mortgages are interest only.  So the principal never falls.  If you’re losing money on the interest repayments, and you’re not actually paying anything off the loan, your only hope is that house prices go up by the 5-10% the spruikers claim is “normal”.

But it isn’t normal.  And that’s the problem.  No investment has a “normal” return.  Returns vary all the time.  Sometimes returns are good, and sometimes they’re bad.

Returns vary based on something called risk.  I know that word isn’t familiar to property investors.  As far as they’re concerned there’s no risk to property investment.  Only there is… lots of it.

You only need to ask share investors how risky a market can be after years of being told there’s no risk.  Share investors saw in 1987, 2000 and 2008 how things bad can be.

And hopefully most share investors aren’t now making the same mistakes that many made leading up to those dates.

But I’m afraid property investors haven’t learnt their lesson.  And it’s not necessarily their fault.

For most of them all they’ve seen is house prices going up.  Even though they’re only looking at a short timeframe of twenty-odd years or less, they’ve been trained to believe house prices rise – regardless of anything that happens to the economy.

But it’s not just what they’ve seen.  It’s what they’ve been told as well.  Trouble is, they’ve learned from the vested interests in the property sector.

Vested interests who just can’t admit house prices could and will fall.  Because as soon as they admit it they’ll let the biggest investing cat out of the bag in history: that property right now is a terrible investment.

The fact is, paying more for something than it returns isn’t an investment, it’s an expense.  You’ll find that in any Investing 101 manual.

But still, even though the Australian housing market is falling down around them, the property spruikers and experts tell you to look the other way… there’s nothing to see.

They’re wrong.  There is something to see.  It’s the beginning of the collapse of the Australian housing bubble.

A bubble that’s maxed out on easy credit fed to gullible borrowers by the banks for the past thirty years.

If you want further proof of the unviability of property investing, just take a look at page three of today’s Australian Financial Review (AFR).  Under the headline “Bargain time for luxury pads”, is a sorry tale of property investing gone wrong.

It would be a mistake to think these losses only happen to bigwig fatcats who have overspent on trinkets and real estate.  Because the scale of these losses – in percentage terms – is exactly the same losses the average property investor is making right now…

And it’ll only get worse.

Quite frankly, the way I see it, it won’t be long until the AFR has a headline saying “Bargain time for suburban housing”.

Only then might it be time to get your chequebook ready to buy property.  But right now property investing is a game for mugs… a very expensive game for mugs.


http://www.moneymorning.com.au/20110308/why-property-investing-is-for-mugs.html#more-4790
Back to top
 

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace." Hendrix
andrei said: Great isn't it? Seeing boatloads of what is nothing more than human garbage turn up.....
 
IP Logged
 
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Re:  'Worst ever' property dive after disasters
Reply #215 - Mar 8th, 2011 at 2:05pm
 
Hmm  .. interesting.

I don't agree with a few things stated in that.

In fact I picked up a few mistakes.

Back to top
 

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Re:  'Worst ever' property dive after disasters
Reply #216 - Mar 8th, 2011 at 2:08pm
 
Now let me see where that all came from.

Back to top
 

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Re:  'Worst ever' property dive after disasters
Reply #217 - Mar 8th, 2011 at 2:12pm
 
LOL! Ah yes. Okkkkayyyy.
Back to top
 

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
Ex Dame Pansi
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 24168
Re:  'Worst ever' property dive after disasters
Reply #218 - Mar 8th, 2011 at 2:19pm
 
Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 8th, 2011 at 2:05pm:
Hmm  .. interesting.

I don't agree with a few things stated in that.

In fact I picked up a few mistakes.




I bet you did lol
Back to top
 

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace." Hendrix
andrei said: Great isn't it? Seeing boatloads of what is nothing more than human garbage turn up.....
 
IP Logged
 
Sir lastnail
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 30900
Gender: male
Re:  'Worst ever' property dive after disasters
Reply #219 - Mar 8th, 2011 at 8:55pm
 
Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 8th, 2011 at 2:12pm:
LOL! Ah yes. Okkkkayyyy.


here it is http://www.moneymorning.com.au/20110308/why-property-investing-is-for-mugs.html

what is wrong with what he says in particular the bit about property never going down but every other investment does ??

Lisa, just because you don't want property to go down doesn't mean that it won't. It reminds me of people after the dot com crash of 2000 who lost bucket loads trying to rationalize the market and believing that it would return to its former glory as though the market was reading their mind and was going to do what they wanted it to do !!
Back to top
 

"If you take out Saddam, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region..." - Benjamin Netanyahu in 1995
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re:  'Worst ever' property dive after disasters
Reply #220 - Mar 8th, 2011 at 9:10pm
 
We have been hearing this same doom and gloom rubbish for years now. it was wrong then and it is wrong now. while losers like nail and pansi have been salivating over the prospect of 40-75% price drops, house prices have actually INCREASED 40%. there are so many things wrong with the comparison with USA UK and IRELAND it is hard to know where to start so I will start with just one: all of those three countries are economic basket cases. one is offically bankrupt and the other two are close.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Sir lastnail
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 30900
Gender: male
Re:  'Worst ever' property dive after disasters
Reply #221 - Mar 8th, 2011 at 9:14pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Mar 8th, 2011 at 9:10pm:
We have been hearing this same doom and gloom rubbish for years now. it was wrong then and it is wrong now. while losers like nail and pansi have been salivating over the prospect of 40-75% price drops, house prices have actually INCREASED 40%. there are so many things wrong with the comparison with USA UK and IRELAND it is hard to know where to start so I will start with just one: all of those three countries are economic basket cases. one is offically bankrupt and the other two are close.


well it is horribly over priced and guess what happens to something when it is horribly over priced ??

If you ask a property spruiker they will tell you that the price stays the same or actually goes up !! Of course that makes perfect economic sense doesn't it Wink LOL
Back to top
 

"If you take out Saddam, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region..." - Benjamin Netanyahu in 1995
 
IP Logged
 
tickfen
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1405
Gender: male
Re:  'Worst ever' property dive after disasters
Reply #222 - Mar 8th, 2011 at 9:15pm
 
Sir lastnail wrote on Mar 8th, 2011 at 8:55pm:
what is wrong with what he says in particular the bit about property never going down but every other investment does ??





property has as much chance of going down as my missus does - bugger all!!!!!!!!








bwaaaaaaaahaaaaaaaaaaaa
Back to top
 

Yeah, I know I'm right, so I guess you just have to learn to live with that!
 
IP Logged
 
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Re:  'Worst ever' property dive after disasters
Reply #223 - Mar 8th, 2011 at 10:04pm
 
Sir lastnail wrote on Mar 8th, 2011 at 8:55pm:
Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 8th, 2011 at 2:12pm:
LOL! Ah yes. Okkkkayyyy.


here it is http://www.moneymorning.com.au/20110308/why-property-investing-is-for-mugs.html

what is wrong with what he says in particular the bit about property never going down but every other investment does ??

Lisa, just because you don't want property to go down doesn't mean that it won't.


Last Nail .. it has nothing at all to do with that.

The guy responsible for that publication has a questionable reputation/vested interest in what he is pushing.

And he talks a lot of sh.it too.

PLEASE tell me you're not RELYING on what he says.
Back to top
 

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Re:  'Worst ever' property dive after disasters
Reply #224 - Mar 8th, 2011 at 10:08pm
 
well it is horribly over priced and guess what happens to something when it is horribly over priced ??

- Last Nail


Sure there are ADJUSTMENTS which occur along the way .. and don't forget we've had a few crashes already. What happened there???? The market was disrupted temporarily then continued going UP.

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/property/dont-expect-property-crash-anytime-soo...

Take a look at the table in that link .. it's more or less right.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Mar 8th, 2011 at 10:20pm by Lisa Jones »  

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18
Send Topic Print