... wrote on Mar 3
rd, 2011 at 4:50pm:
Axle wrote on Mar 3
rd, 2011 at 4:45pm:
That cry from you, Wesley, is a little precious. There's over-the-top commentary from the right. However, we don't ever see you condemning it or stating that its excessive but you're quick to condemn anything that comes from a direction that you're averse to regardless of any merit. In fact, you'd rather censor any opposition. However, please note, you have gone down as saying two things:
1. "You gotta take the good with the bad"
2. "It's all a matter of interpretation"
All's fair , eh? So don't whine.
Now, Coral, is hiding a lot within jargon and euphemism. He's trying to sound as if he has the "real truth" but it's suppressed. This is the stuff of conspiracy theorists. I very much doubt that you have the real truth.
In as far as we're rolling off lines, I'd say that the evidence, so far, weighs predominantly in favour of human beings being mostly the same and the variation is minor and not anywhere near enough separate people into clear and distinct "types".
I thought about addressing each 'point' indivudally, but I soon realised I could address them all at once, with one simple statement:
WHAT A LOAD OF IRRELEVANT HORSESHIT.
But nothing has to make sense, or even be pertinent in any way, so long as you remember the golden rule: 'RACISM IS BAD MMMMKAY'
Just because you say so, doesn't make it so. That's your usual line for things you don't want to hear, nothing new. I'd say by way of observation you mostly respond with irrelevant rhetorical questions. The case in point was your direct response after I said racism should be resisted.
You answered by asking whether the world has got any better and open to iinterpretation.
What's right with racism? It stereotypes, it deprives people of rights, subjects them to abuse, and often results in vioence.
The golden rule as you call it sounds pretty good to me. Racism sucks.
And I'm free to say so and I think it's ethical to say so. If you don't like it, tough.