so much for shoulder to the wheel everyone must contribute to this disaster is it only the left that give a sh!t about what these people are going though.. what else was it.. something about the hard right..lol..

no the only ones to contribute will be those earning over $50k..

and booby has proved his worth along with Wilke that blackmail is the way to go.. and get huge pats on the back..

the we only sell out vote party arty

you see we really dont give a stuff about Qld or Vic or Darwin..its all about our votes..and thats what comes first..

what a country!!

Translated: The flood repairs will take longer now because the money she planned to use for faster delivery of flood relief has been swallowed up by Bob Brown and our independents wanting to be reimbursed for their votes.



So this is just your thinking?


Meanwhile why didn't Abbott give the flood levy the tick without any strings?

Abbott boycotted the flood tax levy based on principle, he knew it was an unnecessary tax, one which you all in time will come to realise, so why would he sign a tax he knows is purely for politically opportunistic purposes?

That would mean he'd have to say..."Yeah, I was stupid enough to give it the tick too"...when I know, he's smart enough to tell this is a complete cop-out and rort.


It's probably as close as you can get to fraud without getting prosecuted based on the presumption of innocence and the fact that Gillard has safe guarded herself to provide proof of her 'perceived good-will"  however misguided and staged some of us know this to be.

I know why she did it, Abbott knows why she did it....for those who don't, you will have to wait for the re-plays before the penny finally drops.




Fraud: A deception deliberately practised in order to secure unfair or unlawful gain.

It all comes out in the wash....including the generous donations made by the royal family and President Obama to the flood appeal.

Even Oprah and the Gates donated.

Have they disclosed this? No...and why not?

Ok, people have a right to donate privately, but there's no harm adding the sum to the public register as having come from an anonymous donor.

Never assume everyone is as stupid as you look. OK

Furthermore, I'm far from blubbering, things are going according to plan.

Gillard is making mistakes and contradicting herself all over the place...so is effectively, bringing her self down.

mellie wrote on Feb 18^th, 2011 at 8:58pm:



Jeewiz alevine...you must be twitching by now...wondering why I know what I do.

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 18^th, 2011 at 9:11pm:



You have no idea what he would have done,  and or what he had planned, because he, isn't stupid enough to show his hand only for the faceless men Inc  to come in and steal his glory, policies,  once again like they have in the past.

They chose her because she's a dumb stooge, lacks a genetic duty of care to do the right thing by our country, (no kids futures to worry about)..this and doesn't even appear to have a conscience.  She's a sociopath, an opportunist, and has to pay people to associate with her, and even then, they only do this because they have a vested interest in hers and others agenda.

She wasn't installed based on political merit, even her resume is appalling.

If she failed as a minister then what on earth made you think she would be who is calling the shots and running our country?

Newsflash : Gillards the messenger, that's all...this and the most cultivated loyalist to the regime in charge of our country right now.

That's why she was chosen...she could be relied upon to shut her mouth and keep her head up without so much as a pang of guilt with respects to what's she's enabling others do to our country right now.

She will move overseas as soon as she's toppled.

Umm, to get back your topic, mellie.

What say ye?  Do you agree that the House of Reps is a done deal and that the ALP need only one......Nick...in the Senate.

So tell me.

Who/what is holding up that 'relief?'

mellie wrote on Feb 18^th, 2011 at 6:33pm:





What about moieee
It isnt feeear
I wont moiii tax
my flood leveeee

Caant yoo seee
I'm a wanna-beee

coz,

Labor take more than weee give

It's all about moiieeeee

what about moiiieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee  

What about moieee
It isnt feeear
I wont moiii tax
my flood leveeee

Caant yoo seee
I'm a wanna-beee

coz,

Labor take more than weee give

It's all about moiieeeee

what about moiiieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee  

____________________________________________

Lost for words?

Never.  Tony already stated his costings in a number of areas, as I have already defined, though was branded a racist for impinging on $400 out of  $500 million Indonesian school funding, wanting to defer the rest until we had sorted out our flood crisis.  
Imediatly, Gillard sprung into refugee funeral grieving mode, then went on to demand Liberals sack a minister based on rumour and speculation, similar to the way she accused Julian Assange of criminal acts...but was she held accountable for her vicious spiteful lies?

No, we just got on with things and let her have her day in the sun.

Ok, Labor day saints supporters may still have faith, but guess what?

Queenslanders want a coalition victory, this and would even take Rudd back in a pinch if given half a chance.

Feast your eyes on this my weary little leftard muppets...

QUEENSLANDERS want Kevin Rudd to return to the Labor leadership, according to a new Galaxy poll conducted exclusively for The Courier-Mail.

In a sign of how Julia Gillard is struggling to regain ground in the Sunshine State, she only won 33 per cent support as preferred Labor leader compared with Mr Rudd's 44 per cent.

Even more damaging for Labor, Tony Abbott is now neck-and-neck with Ms Gillard as preferred prime minister with both recording 47 per cent support in Queensland.

And only 49 per cent of Queenslanders support Ms Gillard's plan for a $1.8 billion flood levy to help rebuild the state, with even 24 per cent of Labor voters opposing the tax.



http://www.couriermail.com.au/ipad/alp-needs-rudds-help-in-queensland/story-fn6c...


Now, have a lovely sleep, and await your impending reality when it bites, some time in the morning after logging in and reading this.

xx

mantra wrote on Feb 19^th, 2011 at 7:07am:


Lol, I wish...  Sorry to disappoint you there Mantra, but I think you know I am a mere media communications student, and still have quite some way to go before I even think about writing policies for a competent Liberal party who I'm certain, are more than capable of writing their own.

Ps- President Borat Obama would like his back now, so if it's not too much trouble, have Shorten put this on his to-do-nothing list.

You know, I should leave my 'scant' resume on Bill Shorten's and Mark Arbibs desk, given they have a knack for picking them.

Latham, Gillard, Rudd.... Oooh the talent!

Are they retiring Peter Garrett?

Looks like they have found a new celebrity politician.

Quote:

FOREIGN Affairs Minister Kevin Rudd said he was considering making Shane Warne an unofficial ambassador for his role in "deepening" the relationship between Australia and Britain.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/ipad/rudd-sees-political-role-for-warnie/story-fn6bn...

The time has come!

Abbott will be more selective with immigration, will stop the boats and return those arriving illegally in our country currently being kept at the tax-payers expense.

Ordinary Australians (other than the super wealthy) don't stand a chance under a Labor government.

Tony Abbott will not blow the budget or donate irresponsibly for personal business reasons by way of misappropriating foreign aid, the way Labor has,  and to such an extent whereby Australian victims of natural disaster are expected to tax-fund their own charity, despite this charity having already been donated by those ie President Obama, Gates, Opera etc etc etc...and the Royal family too, our government don't wish to talk about.

If it was donated to us, shouldn't we at least be told about it so we may say thank you at least, or is the flood appeal money not really the public's money afterall?

Labor have taken Obamas opportunistic advice, of which is to "Not let a good disaster go to waste"...this and plan to bank-roll their election campaign on charity the public assumed would be going directly towards flood relief, when in fact, they have all intentions of using this flood-tax revenue, coupled with the generosity of secret santas (donors) to restore a gaping big deficit they blew to begin with in readiness for next federal election.

Imagine what we could have done with this money had Labor not been so irresponsible, what would Australia be today?

Perhaps this prospect scares the sh1t out of other developed nations who are hell bent on keeping us down, remaining dependants of the UN and at the mercy of the WTO.


Why were Obamas, the royal family's, amongst other high profile donors flood-donations kept secret?

Flood tax -vrs- ALP campaign funding at the Australian tax-payers expense and ignorance.

Sometimes, ignorance is not bliss.

Yes, we will tax-fund our own flood levy, but where will all the donated funds go?

Or aren't we the mere tax-payer supposed to be asking these sorts of questions?

Think twice!

Charity should begin at home...  however a Gillard government have taken this concept to a whole new sinister level, this and seem to think the charity was intended for them, to bankroll themselves out debt, this and should be used for politically opportunist reasons.

Prevailing wrote on Feb 19^th, 2011 at 12:57pm:


In Australia we are in the position to head off the fascist dictatorship driving them from power if we act now preemptively and move against them in street protests and legal action - the day of the liberation of Australian man from the hated Aristocracy is at hand.

mellie wrote on Feb 19^th, 2011 at 1:27pm:


Both parties are in the hands of the same Aristocratic scum - the only question I ask is after the revolution will it be possible for them to remain in Britain, Ireland or Australia?  I think not they will have to retreat to the US and Canada and take their chances there in a climate increasingly hostile to them there too.   

mellie wrote on Feb 19^th, 2011 at 1:41pm:


Abbott is Aristocratic scum who will try to bury us if he comes to power, we have no choice but to head them off now.  The momentum is growing rapidly in the UK, Ireland and here - the Aristocracy will fall here before it collapses soon after in the US their days are numbered.

Prevailing wrote on Feb 19^th, 2011 at 1:47pm:


But he is the better of the two scums we have ...furthermore, Abbott is not an aristocrat, I think he's the first leader who ran for PM who had a household mortgage.

Turnbull is aristocratic scum, likewise with Bronwyn Bishop, and even Costello to a degree...

Howard and Abbott are both staunch monarchist,(true liberals)  this and oppose republicanism, of which the elitists are trying to pass.

Abbott might even be the last true liberal battler, unless he can somehow impress his values onto another coming up through the ranks on the conservative side.

In fact, from what I hear, Abbott is more of a monarchist than the Queen herself these days, her having loosened her values and caved in to political fund-raising under the guise of flood relief, by way of making secret donations to the ALP.

Monarchism isn't about loving the Queen, it's about sovereignty and independence.

It's about grass-roots democracy, if only the royal family would think of this before donating to fascist governments.

This is why Howard chose Abbott, and didn't want Costello, (as clever as he is with economics) becoming leader of the Liberal party, because he knew, Costellos decadent self-serving elitist process would eventually corrupt his own process, this and reflect poorly on Howards own political history, his legacy.. if he allowed him to fill his shoes.

Turnbull is another elitist.

Abbott is a grass-roots Liberal, this and our last chance to be our own nation, with liberties and freedom's unique to Australia.

Labor want us sold off.

Do you read many political biographies?

It's a good starting point.



_______________

The older the better.... read every Australian party leaders biography you can,  the official, and unofficial...(they are all relative) and lend much insight into our nations political landscape.

The good, and the bad...

FRED. wrote on Feb 19^th, 2011 at 2:15pm:



Only if history lies - but he will remain a Bastard and a rodent.

The older I get, the more I realise Howard was possibly the best PM our nations ever seen.

He put us on the map, made us the fastest growing economy in the developed world we are today.

And quite a few developed others are nervous, and know we have much to offer, resource wise, our only down fall is water.

Clever economics coupled with a genuine vested interest in Australians welfare worked a treat.

This is why Howard was in for 12 years, and is why Rudd didn't even make a term when the public suddenly realised they made the wrong decision.

And they are even more disappointed with Gillard, who is just another EU sock-puppet anyway.

I find it difficult to agree with hitting a guy on $50,000 with a levy to support a state (and in some cases individuals) who have not bothered to take out insurance. Doing the calculating on the ATO web site I find that this guy would take home about $800 a week - he may be supporting a wife and paying off a mortgage.

Labor today secured the support of Tasmanian independent Andrew Wilkie for the $1.8 billion levy after agreeing to restore $50 million in proposed education cuts.

Mr Wilkie's support for the controversial levy ensures it will pass the House of Representatives, but the government needs Senator Xenophon's support in the upper house before it can implement the charge from July 1.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/gillard-eyes-flood-levy-deal-to-force-disaster-insurance-on-states/story-fn59niix-1226008074315

So where is Jules going to get her extra money. If you look at the Australian Learning and Teaching Council website you will see that cuts to this program will not be missed as it is nothing more than a grandeiose scheme paying directors millions of tax dollars for NO benefit.

The member for Blair in February 2010 spent $1.3 million on printing letterheads, envelopes and other stationary.

He then prints out a monthly newsletter and has it distributed to every house in Ipswich and all other surrounding areas.

February 2011 Mr Neauman pays a company that works from a residential house to distribute the full colour envelopes with his full colour letterhead with double sided printing. Australia post also put the same envelopes in every private mail box.

2 times in the 1 week we received his special looking envelope filled with garbage of how good his political party is doing.

From speaking to him, all printing was done in Canberra.

Pitty these funds couldn't be used for flood relief in his own electorate.

MrBafner wrote on Feb 20^th, 2011 at 12:12am:




hey I also have been getting one of these color brochures from a newly elected Labor member with all the usual gaff in it.. and pictures of himself of course. adnauseum..

do you mean to tell me we are paying for all that bin fodder..to the tune of over a million.??????thats wicked its like junk mail its clogging up the environment, does anyone see the irony in this? it costs a fortune to go to the dump these days.why because they keep fillinf up

and we have to not only put up with these ego trips we have to pay for it.
in the millions.

'Within parliamentary entitlement' -


A line rolled out whenever an MP is caught with his hand in the till.

They are a disgusting set of individuals.

No different to Swan upgrading all his staff to the tune of $70k to first class international airfares at OUR EXPENSE.

Disgusting.
Party of the people? Give me a break.