Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print
Whats holding up our flood relief? (Read 5843 times)
beware
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 783
Re: Whats holding up our flood relief?
Reply #45 - Feb 19th, 2011 at 2:58pm
 
I find it difficult to agree with hitting a guy on $50,000 with a levy to support a state (and in some cases individuals) who have not bothered to take out insurance. Doing the calculating on the ATO web site I find that this guy would take home about $800 a week - he may be supporting a wife and paying off a mortgage.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Andrei.Hicks
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23818
Carlsbad, CA
Gender: male
Re: Whats holding up our flood relief?
Reply #46 - Feb 19th, 2011 at 2:59pm
 
beware wrote on Feb 19th, 2011 at 2:58pm:
I find it difficult to agree with hitting a guy on $50,000 with a levy to support a state (and in some cases individuals) who have not bothered to take out insurance. Doing the calculating on the ATO web site I find that this guy would take home about $800 a week - he may be supporting a wife and paying off a mortgage.



< APPLAUSE >
Back to top
 

Anyone who lives within their means suffers from a lack of imagination - Oscar Wilde
 
IP Logged
 
beware
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 783
Re: Whats holding up our flood relief?
Reply #47 - Feb 19th, 2011 at 3:04pm
 
Labor today secured the support of Tasmanian independent Andrew Wilkie for the $1.8 billion levy after agreeing to restore $50 million in proposed education cuts.

Mr Wilkie's support for the controversial levy ensures it will pass the House of Representatives, but the government needs Senator Xenophon's support in the upper house before it can implement the charge from July 1.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/gillard-eyes-flood-levy-deal-to-force-disaster-insurance-on-states/story-fn59niix-1226008074315

So where is Jules going to get her extra money. If you look at the Australian Learning and Teaching Council website you will see that cuts to this program will not be missed as it is nothing more than a grandeiose scheme paying directors millions of tax dollars for NO benefit.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Prevailing
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7169
Stop Men
Re: Whats holding up our flood relief?
Reply #48 - Feb 19th, 2011 at 3:06pm
 
mellie wrote on Feb 19th, 2011 at 1:41pm:
We dont have the luxury of time to wait for some sort of democratic people-powerd revolution, and are faced with having to decide between the better of two evils.

I think Abbott has more of an incentive to do the right thing by Australia, he has children who's own future prospects pendulate on whether or not "dad gets it right".

The decisions Abbott makes when he gets in, will be the most important decisions made in Australian history, as we are on the dawn of a new era, global political climate, world order.

Think back, think of the worlds worst notorious and ruthless dictators, and ask yourself, did they have lineage to concern about in the event things went pear shaped?

Hitler didn't have children either.

It gives them an edge of unaccountability, invincibility, not having to worry about others they love suffering tomorrow as a result of the decisions they make today.





I dont think there is a future for the progeny of John Howard and Tony Abbott in Australia after the dictatorship collapses - it will be "unsustainable" for them - Ted the Toff yes because to his credit he has done absolutely nothing sice he got in office and thats how we like it - a nice timid compliant Government that does what it is told and shuts up. Smiley
Back to top
 

I condemn Male Violence Against Women
The Government Supports Gynocide
There Is Something Dreadfully Wrong With Men
 
IP Logged
 
MrBafner
New Member
*
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11
Re: Whats holding up our flood relief?
Reply #49 - Feb 20th, 2011 at 12:12am
 
The member for Blair in February 2010 spent $1.3 million on printing letterheads, envelopes and other stationary.

He then prints out a monthly newsletter and has it distributed to every house in Ipswich and all other surrounding areas.

February 2011 Mr Neauman pays a company that works from a residential house to distribute the full colour envelopes with his full colour letterhead with double sided printing. Australia post also put the same envelopes in every private mail box.

2 times in the 1 week we received his special looking envelope filled with garbage of how good his political party is doing.

From speaking to him, all printing was done in Canberra.

Pitty these funds couldn't be used for flood relief in his own electorate.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
buzzanddidj
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 14247
Eganstown, via Daylesford, VIC
Gender: male
Re: Whats holding up our flood relief?
Reply #50 - Feb 20th, 2011 at 6:37am
 
MrBafner wrote on Feb 20th, 2011 at 12:12am:
The member for Blair in February 2010 spent
$1.3 million
on printing letterheads, envelopes and other stationary.

He then prints out a monthly newsletter and has it distributed to every house in Ipswich and all other surrounding areas.

February 2011 Mr Neauman pays a company that works from a residential house to distribute the full colour envelopes with his full colour letterhead with double sided printing. Australia post also put the same envelopes in every private mail box.

2 times in the 1 week we received his special looking envelope filled with garbage of how good his political party is doing.

From speaking to him, all printing was done in Canberra.

Pitty these funds couldn't be used for flood relief in his own electorate.




BY BUYING 1.3 million sheets of personalised letterhead in one hit, Federal MP Shayne Neumann maintains he is saving taxpayers thousands of dollars.

Yesterday Mr Neumann defended his big spending on stationery in the first half of this year, saying he was doing his job and “communicating with constituents”.

Media reports over the weekend revealed that the Labor backbencher had greatly surpassed Opposition Leader Tony Abbott – who purchased a mere 491,000 sheets of personalised letterhead before the Federal election – in his buying spree.

Mr Neumann said his “printing and communication” costs of $106,314 were within parliamentary entitlement.
“There’s nothing unethical and it’s entirely lawful,” he said.

“I have done nothing wrong.

http://www.qt.com.au/story/2010/12/06/mp-orders-big-to-save-taxpayer-dollars-on-...




IT HAS been dubbed "toner-gate" - a three-week, $300,000 splurge on printer ink by Liberal MPs to stock up on office supplies for the pending federal election.

After being told in September 2009 that a strict finance cap would be introduced from October 1 that year, Opposition members ordered $267,288 worth of printer cartridge toner, according to documents obtained through Freedom of Information.

With the election almost a year away, some Liberal figures claimed they were told by party HQ to be "ruthless" ordering taxpayer-funded supplies ahead of the campaign.

One Liberal MP, West Australian Don Randall, ordered $25,414.68 of toner cartridges for his office printer, while South Australian Patrick Secker spent $21,797.74.

Deputy Speaker Peter Slipper spent $19,280.83 while ex-Liberal Michael Johnson ordered $18,640.86 for his office - enough to fund a marginal seat's campaign.

Despite its parliamentary majority of 18, Labor MPs spent $127,488 in the same period - less than half what the Coalition spent.



http://www.news.com.au/national/liberals-spend-300000-in-three-weeks-on-printer-...
Back to top
 

'I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians.
Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.'


- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Whats holding up our flood relief?
Reply #51 - Feb 20th, 2011 at 7:30am
 
MrBafner wrote on Feb 20th, 2011 at 12:12am:
The member for Blair in February 2010 spent $1.3 million on printing letterheads, envelopes and other stationary.

He then prints out a monthly newsletter and has it distributed to every house in Ipswich and all other surrounding areas.

February 2011 Mr Neauman pays a company that works from a residential house to distribute the full colour envelopes with his full colour letterhead with double sided printing. Australia post also put the same envelopes in every private mail box.

2 times in the 1 week we received his special looking envelope filled with garbage of how good his political party is doing.

From speaking to him, all printing was done in Canberra.

Pitty these funds couldn't be used for flood relief in his own electorate.




hey I also have been getting one of these color brochures from a newly elected Labor member with all the usual gaff in it.. and pictures of himself of course. adnauseum..

do you mean to tell me we are paying for all that bin fodder..to the tune of over a million.??????thats wicked its like junk mail its clogging up the environment, does anyone see the irony in this? it costs a fortune to go to the dump these days.why because they keep fillinf up

and we have to not only put up with these ego trips we have to pay for it.
in the millions.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Whats holding up our flood relief?
Reply #52 - Feb 20th, 2011 at 7:34am
 
buzzanddidj wrote on Feb 20th, 2011 at 6:37am:
MrBafner wrote on Feb 20th, 2011 at 12:12am:
The member for Blair in February 2010 spent
$1.3 million
on printing letterheads, envelopes and other stationary.

He then prints out a monthly newsletter and has it distributed to every house in Ipswich and all other surrounding areas.

February 2011 Mr Neauman pays a company that works from a residential house to distribute the full colour envelopes with his full colour letterhead with double sided printing. Australia post also put the same envelopes in every private mail box.

2 times in the 1 week we received his special looking envelope filled with garbage of how good his political party is doing.

From speaking to him, all printing was done in Canberra.

Pitty these funds couldn't be used for flood relief in his own electorate.




BY BUYING 1.3 million sheets of personalised letterhead in one hit, Federal MP Shayne Neumann maintains he is saving taxpayers thousands of dollars.

Yesterday Mr Neumann defended his big spending on stationery in the first half of this year, saying he was doing his job and “communicating with constituents”.

Media reports over the weekend revealed that the Labor backbencher had greatly surpassed Opposition Leader Tony Abbott – who purchased a mere 491,000 sheets of personalised letterhead before the Federal election – in his buying spree.

Mr Neumann said his “printing and communication” costs of $106,314 were within parliamentary entitlement.
“There’s nothing unethical and it’s entirely lawful,” he said.

“I have done nothing wrong.

http://www.qt.com.au/story/2010/12/06/mp-orders-big-to-save-taxpayer-dollars-on-...




IT HAS been dubbed "toner-gate" - a three-week, $300,000 splurge on printer ink by Liberal MPs to stock up on office supplies for the pending federal election.

After being told in September 2009 that a strict finance cap would be introduced from October 1 that year, Opposition members ordered $267,288 worth of printer cartridge toner, according to documents obtained through Freedom of Information.

With the election almost a year away, some Liberal figures claimed they were told by party HQ to be "ruthless" ordering taxpayer-funded supplies ahead of the campaign.

One Liberal MP, West Australian Don Randall, ordered $25,414.68 of toner cartridges for his office printer, while South Australian Patrick Secker spent $21,797.74.

Deputy Speaker Peter Slipper spent $19,280.83 while ex-Liberal Michael Johnson ordered $18,640.86 for his office - enough to fund a marginal seat's campaign.

Despite its parliamentary majority of 18, Labor MPs spent $127,488 in the same period - less than half what the Coalition spent.



http://www.news.com.au/national/liberals-spend-300000-in-three-weeks-on-printer-...




xx


somewhere somehow something needs to be done about this..no one in their right mind can think this is okay.

havent we had enough appalling waste and bad ideas already just looking at NSW makes me sick to my stomach... these people are out of control..they know there is no accountability in govt.neither side has anything to be proud of as far as I am concerned.. I get sick of hearing how we are taken for bunnies.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Andrei.Hicks
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23818
Carlsbad, CA
Gender: male
Re: Whats holding up our flood relief?
Reply #53 - Feb 20th, 2011 at 7:37am
 
'Within parliamentary entitlement' -


A line rolled out whenever an MP is caught with his hand in the till.

They are a disgusting set of individuals.

No different to Swan upgrading all his staff to the tune of $70k to first class international airfares at OUR EXPENSE.

Disgusting.
Party of the people? Give me a break.
Back to top
 

Anyone who lives within their means suffers from a lack of imagination - Oscar Wilde
 
IP Logged
 
mellie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 8142
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: Whats holding up our flood relief?
Reply #54 - Feb 21st, 2011 at 12:24am
 
Nick Xenophons bribe cut to remain a secret, but Gill Frost insists money destined to help with the roll out of her flood levy will cover it...

(No wonder she doesn't want Abbott snooping about her treasury)

What was that about transparency again Gillard?

So much for a rainbow cabinet, it's just turned to sludge!

Quote:
THE $1.8 billion flood levy hangs on the decision of one South Australian senator.

Independent Andrew Wilkie has "begrudgingly" agreed to back the levy, so the Bill can pass the Lower House, after $50 million the Government had proposed cutting from higher education was reinstated.

"What I've ensured is that this is a good policy, or at least a better policy," Mr Wilkie said.

Prime Minister Julia Gillard did not reveal where extra cuts would be made, merely saying the cost of the deals would "be offset in the federal Budget in May".

Nick Xenophon is the only potential stumbling block in the Upper House, after the Greens and Family First senator Steve Fielding agreed to back the Bill.

Senator Xenophon wants states made to have disaster insurance so there won't be future arguments about how to pay for recovery.


http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/national/nick-xenophon-support-crucial-to-flood...

Grin
Back to top
 

All together now Labor voters.......&&&&lap-tops, pink-bats refugees and Clunker-cars&&&&insurance.AES256
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print