Prevailing wrote on Feb 19
th, 2011 at 1:47pm:
mellie wrote on Feb 19
th, 2011 at 1:41pm:
We dont have the luxury of time to wait for some sort of democratic people-powerd revolution, and are faced with having to decide between the better of two evils.
I think Abbott has more of an incentive to do the right thing by Australia, he has children who's own future prospects pendulate on whether or not "dad gets it right".
The decisions Abbott makes when he gets in, will be the most important decisions made in Australian history, as we are on the dawn of a new era, global political climate, world order.
Think back, think of the worlds worst notorious and ruthless dictators, and ask yourself, did they have lineage to concern about in the event things went pear shaped?
Hitler didn't have children either.
It gives them an edge of unaccountability, invincibility, not having to worry about others they love suffering tomorrow as a result of the decisions they make today.
Abbott is Aristocratic scum who will try to bury us if he comes to power, we have no choice but to head them off now. The momentum is growing rapidly in the UK, Ireland and here - the Aristocracy will fall here before it collapses soon after in the US their days are numbered.
But he is the better of the two scums we have ...furthermore, Abbott is not an aristocrat, I think he's the first leader who ran for PM who had a household mortgage.
Turnbull is aristocratic scum, likewise with Bronwyn Bishop, and even Costello to a degree...
Howard and Abbott are both staunch monarchist,(true liberals) this and oppose republicanism, of which the elitists are trying to pass.
Abbott might even be the last true liberal battler, unless he can somehow impress his values onto another coming up through the ranks on the conservative side.