Umm, to get back your topic, mellie.

What say ye?  Do you agree that the House of Reps is a done deal and that the ALP need only one......Nick...in the Senate.

So tell me.

Who/what is holding up that 'relief?'

mellie wrote on Feb 18^th, 2011 at 6:33pm:





What about moieee
It isnt feeear
I wont moiii tax
my flood leveeee

Caant yoo seee
I'm a wanna-beee

coz,

Labor take more than weee give

It's all about moiieeeee

what about moiiieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee  

What about moieee
It isnt feeear
I wont moiii tax
my flood leveeee

Caant yoo seee
I'm a wanna-beee

coz,

Labor take more than weee give

It's all about moiieeeee

what about moiiieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee  

____________________________________________

Lost for words?

Never.  Tony already stated his costings in a number of areas, as I have already defined, though was branded a racist for impinging on $400 out of  $500 million Indonesian school funding, wanting to defer the rest until we had sorted out our flood crisis.  
Imediatly, Gillard sprung into refugee funeral grieving mode, then went on to demand Liberals sack a minister based on rumour and speculation, similar to the way she accused Julian Assange of criminal acts...but was she held accountable for her vicious spiteful lies?

No, we just got on with things and let her have her day in the sun.

Ok, Labor day saints supporters may still have faith, but guess what?

Queenslanders want a coalition victory, this and would even take Rudd back in a pinch if given half a chance.

Feast your eyes on this my weary little leftard muppets...

QUEENSLANDERS want Kevin Rudd to return to the Labor leadership, according to a new Galaxy poll conducted exclusively for The Courier-Mail.

In a sign of how Julia Gillard is struggling to regain ground in the Sunshine State, she only won 33 per cent support as preferred Labor leader compared with Mr Rudd's 44 per cent.

Even more damaging for Labor, Tony Abbott is now neck-and-neck with Ms Gillard as preferred prime minister with both recording 47 per cent support in Queensland.

And only 49 per cent of Queenslanders support Ms Gillard's plan for a $1.8 billion flood levy to help rebuild the state, with even 24 per cent of Labor voters opposing the tax.



http://www.couriermail.com.au/ipad/alp-needs-rudds-help-in-queensland/story-fn6c...


Now, have a lovely sleep, and await your impending reality when it bites, some time in the morning after logging in and reading this.

xx

mantra wrote on Feb 19^th, 2011 at 7:07am:


Lol, I wish...  Sorry to disappoint you there Mantra, but I think you know I am a mere media communications student, and still have quite some way to go before I even think about writing policies for a competent Liberal party who I'm certain, are more than capable of writing their own.

Ps- President Borat Obama would like his back now, so if it's not too much trouble, have Shorten put this on his to-do-nothing list.

You know, I should leave my 'scant' resume on Bill Shorten's and Mark Arbibs desk, given they have a knack for picking them.

Latham, Gillard, Rudd.... Oooh the talent!

Are they retiring Peter Garrett?

Looks like they have found a new celebrity politician.

Quote:

FOREIGN Affairs Minister Kevin Rudd said he was considering making Shane Warne an unofficial ambassador for his role in "deepening" the relationship between Australia and Britain.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/ipad/rudd-sees-political-role-for-warnie/story-fn6bn...

The time has come!

Abbott will be more selective with immigration, will stop the boats and return those arriving illegally in our country currently being kept at the tax-payers expense.

Ordinary Australians (other than the super wealthy) don't stand a chance under a Labor government.

Tony Abbott will not blow the budget or donate irresponsibly for personal business reasons by way of misappropriating foreign aid, the way Labor has,  and to such an extent whereby Australian victims of natural disaster are expected to tax-fund their own charity, despite this charity having already been donated by those ie President Obama, Gates, Opera etc etc etc...and the Royal family too, our government don't wish to talk about.

If it was donated to us, shouldn't we at least be told about it so we may say thank you at least, or is the flood appeal money not really the public's money afterall?

Labor have taken Obamas opportunistic advice, of which is to "Not let a good disaster go to waste"...this and plan to bank-roll their election campaign on charity the public assumed would be going directly towards flood relief, when in fact, they have all intentions of using this flood-tax revenue, coupled with the generosity of secret santas (donors) to restore a gaping big deficit they blew to begin with in readiness for next federal election.

Imagine what we could have done with this money had Labor not been so irresponsible, what would Australia be today?

Perhaps this prospect scares the sh1t out of other developed nations who are hell bent on keeping us down, remaining dependants of the UN and at the mercy of the WTO.


Why were Obamas, the royal family's, amongst other high profile donors flood-donations kept secret?

Flood tax -vrs- ALP campaign funding at the Australian tax-payers expense and ignorance.

Sometimes, ignorance is not bliss.

Yes, we will tax-fund our own flood levy, but where will all the donated funds go?

Or aren't we the mere tax-payer supposed to be asking these sorts of questions?

Think twice!

Charity should begin at home...  however a Gillard government have taken this concept to a whole new sinister level, this and seem to think the charity was intended for them, to bankroll themselves out debt, this and should be used for politically opportunist reasons.

Prevailing wrote on Feb 19^th, 2011 at 12:57pm:


In Australia we are in the position to head off the fascist dictatorship driving them from power if we act now preemptively and move against them in street protests and legal action - the day of the liberation of Australian man from the hated Aristocracy is at hand.

mellie wrote on Feb 19^th, 2011 at 1:27pm:


Both parties are in the hands of the same Aristocratic scum - the only question I ask is after the revolution will it be possible for them to remain in Britain, Ireland or Australia?  I think not they will have to retreat to the US and Canada and take their chances there in a climate increasingly hostile to them there too.