Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... 14
Send Topic Print
The case against homosexual parents (Read 22406 times)
buzzanddidj
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 14248
Eganstown, via Daylesford, VIC
Gender: male
Re: The case against homosexual parents
Reply #60 - Feb 17th, 2011 at 8:38pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Feb 17th, 2011 at 8:26pm:
But Verge - you are a christian & homosexuality is a sin.


Leviticus 20:
Quote:
13]
If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman,
both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death;
their blood shall be upon them.




A
Christian
follows the word of
Christ
in the
Christian Holy Bible


Not the word of
Jewish scholars
in the
Torah





Back to top
 

'I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians.
Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.'


- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
 
IP Logged
 
Verge
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6329
Gender: male
Re: The case against homosexual parents
Reply #61 - Feb 17th, 2011 at 8:41pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Feb 17th, 2011 at 8:26pm:
But Verge - you are a christian & homosexuality is a sin.


Leviticus 20:
Quote:
13]
If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman,
both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death;
their blood shall be upon them.


Who said I was a christian?

And who said christanity is always right?
Back to top
 

And why not, if you will permit me; why shouldn’t I, if you will permit me; spend my first week as prime minister, should that happen, on this, on your, country - Abbott with the Garma People Aug 13
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 122792
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: The case against homosexual parents
Reply #62 - Feb 17th, 2011 at 8:55pm
 
buzzanddidj wrote on Feb 17th, 2011 at 8:38pm:
Bobby. wrote on Feb 17th, 2011 at 8:26pm:
But Verge - you are a christian & homosexuality is a sin.


Leviticus 20:
Quote:
13]
If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman,
both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death;
their blood shall be upon them.




A
Christian
follows the word of
Christ
in the
Christian Holy Bible


Not the word of
Jewish scholars
in the
Torah



Sorry Buzz - the old laws in the Torah are still binding.
Jesus himself said so:

Matthew 5:
Quote:
[17] Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
[18] For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
[19] Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
buzzanddidj
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 14248
Eganstown, via Daylesford, VIC
Gender: male
Re: The case against homosexual parents
Reply #63 - Feb 17th, 2011 at 9:17pm
 
Matthew 5:
Quote:
[17] Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
[18] For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
[19] Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.






And this has WHAT to do with JC's stance on sexuality ?




Back to top
 

'I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians.
Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.'


- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 122792
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: The case against homosexual parents
Reply #64 - Feb 17th, 2011 at 9:23pm
 
buzzanddidj wrote on Feb 17th, 2011 at 9:17pm:
Matthew 5:
Quote:
[17] Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
[18] For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
[19] Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.

And this has WHAT to do with JC's stance on sexuality ?



Jesus was upholding the old laws.

One of them is in Leviticus.

Leviticus 20:
Quote:
Quote:
13]
If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman,
both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death;
their blood shall be upon them.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 42439
Gender: male
Re: The case against homosexual parents
Reply #65 - Feb 17th, 2011 at 11:29pm
 

bobby - jesus upheld the law.
the law was, when a sin was committed, a penalty applied.

Everyone sins.
Except jesus, so he paid for the sins for everyone.
therefore, the law is not broken. it is fulfilled.
The penalty has been paid, sinners are not condemned to the penalty.

it's a bit broarder than you may think.
ask in the spirituality forum if you wish.
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 122792
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: The case against homosexual parents
Reply #66 - Feb 17th, 2011 at 11:38pm
 
Sprintcyclist wrote on Feb 17th, 2011 at 11:29pm:
bobby - jesus upheld the law.
the law was, when a sin was committed, a penalty applied.

Everyone sins.
Except jesus, so he paid for the sins for everyone.
therefore, the law is not broken. it is fulfilled.
The penalty has been paid, sinners are not condemned to the penalty.

it's a bit broarder than you may think.
ask in the spirituality forum if you wish.


Bible bashers always argue  about what fulfil means
but some more passages drive the point home.



In answer to you I quote this:

http://www.evilbible.com/do_not_ignore_ot.htm
Quote:
“Thou Shall Not Ignore the Old Testament!”  

New Testament Verses Which Demand Following the Old Testament and Law Contradictions:

   I hear so many Christians now a days claim that the Old Testament is defunct for Jesus was the “lamb” to clear away its rules and regulations.  This is just another bullshit scapegoat that Christians use to ignore the atrocities and bizarre laws commanded by their god.  Their preachers spoon feed them that the Old Testament is no longer binding so that they can excuse the majority of evil that the bible promotes.  I am so tired of Christians manipulating the scriptures so that they can assign a kinder nature to their God, that I have assembled a BRIEF list of verses which clearly show that the Old Testament is not to be ignored.  Its laws should indeed be adhered to, for the New Testament demands it!  After this section I shall list where the Bible contradicts itself concerning other laws.

1) “For truly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass the law until all is accomplished.  Whoever then relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but he who does them and teaches them shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.”  (Matthew 5:18-19 RSV)  Clearly the Old Testament is to be abided by until the end of human existence itself.  None other then Jesus said so.

2) All of the vicious Old Testament laws will be binding forever.  "It is easier for Heaven and Earth to pass away than for the smallest part of the letter of the law to become invalid."  (Luke 16:17 NAB)

3) Jesus strongly approves of the law and the prophets.  He hasn’t the slightest objection to the cruelties of the Old Testament.  "Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets.  I have come not to abolish but to fulfill.  Amen, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest part or the smallest part of a letter will pass from the law, until all things have taken place."  (Matthew 5:17 NAB)

3b) "All scripture is inspired by God and is useful for teaching, for refutation, for correction, and for training in righteousness..."  (2 Timothy 3:16 NAB)

3c) "Know this first of all, that there is no prophecy of scripture that is a matter of personal interpretation, for no prophecy ever came through human will; but rather human beings moved by the holy Spirit spoke under the influence of God." (2 Peter 20-21 NAB)

4) Jesus criticizes the Jews for not killing their disobedient children according to Old Testament law.  Mark.7:9-13  "Whoever curses father or mother shall die"  (Mark 7:10 NAB)

5) Jesus is criticized by the Pharisees for not washing his hands before eating.  He defends himself by attacking them for not killing disobedient children according to the commandment: “He that curseth father or mother, let him die the death.”  (Matthew 15:4-7)

6) Jesus has a punishment even worse than his father concerning adultery: God said the act of adultery was punishable by death. Jesus says looking with lust is the same thing and you should gouge your eye out, better a part, than the whole.  The punishment under Jesus is an eternity in Hell.  (Matthew 5:27)

7) Peter says that all slaves should “be subject to [their] masters with all fear,” to the bad and cruel as well as the “good and gentle.”  This is merely an echo of the same slavery commands in the Old Testament. 1 Peter 2:18

8) “Did not Moses give you the law, and yet none of you keepeth the law" (John7:19) and “For the law was given by Moses,..." (John 1:17).

9) “...the scripture cannot be broken.” --Jesus Christ, John 10:35



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
culldav
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2020
Re: The case against homosexual parents
Reply #67 - Feb 17th, 2011 at 11:45pm
 
whatsforme wrote on Feb 17th, 2011 at 3:24pm:
skippy. wrote on Feb 17th, 2011 at 1:34pm:
Sprintcyclist wrote on Feb 17th, 2011 at 10:34am:
culldav prob haggles over the $2 quote

Oh smacking LOL sprinty, thats actually funny. Grin Grin Grin Are you sure you're a kiwi?



Save your $2 culldav.

Skippy doing it  free. He needs the practice as the Mardi Gras is coming up.



Roo boy has to compete with the skank up the road from my nephews joint, as she a tounge ring and swallows.   Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 42439
Gender: male
Re: The case against homosexual parents
Reply #68 - Feb 18th, 2011 at 12:02am
 

bobby - yes, the law of the jews is not broken.
it is still relevant, for jews.

christianity fulfils the law.
the law is not wrong, people do sin, and spiritually penalties apply.

member, often the penalty is the sacrifice of a lamb ?
jesus is termed "the lamb of God."
He is our sacrifice for our sins.
the law is correct and fulfilled.

start a thread in the spiritual forum, if it please you.
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 122792
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: The case against homosexual parents
Reply #69 - Feb 18th, 2011 at 12:10am
 
Sprintcyclist wrote on Feb 18th, 2011 at 12:02am:
bobby - yes, the law of the jews is not broken.
it is still relevant, for jews.

christianity fulfils the law.
the law is not wrong, people do sin, and spiritually penalties apply.

member, often the penalty is the sacrifice of a lamb ?
jesus is termed "the lamb of God."
He is our sacrifice for our sins.
the law is correct and fulfilled.

start a thread in the spiritual forum, if it please you.



Maybe - but really you didn't read what I posted
& I don't think anyone will there either.
I just wanted to remind christians about homosexuality -
it's a sin punished by death & eternal torment in hellfire & damnation - that's all.
I like to educate the misinformed - I should be paid for it.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 42439
Gender: male
Re: The case against homosexual parents
Reply #70 - Feb 18th, 2011 at 12:21am
 


Quote:
“Do not judge, or you too will be judged.
For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.
“Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?


matthew 7:1-3
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
JC Denton
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 5520
Gender: female
Re: The case against homosexual parents
Reply #71 - Feb 18th, 2011 at 12:37am
 
what a peanut brained quote

how can i make sense of the world if i cant judge anybody

bible is garbage
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Amadd
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Mo

Posts: 6217
Re: The case against homosexual parents
Reply #72 - Feb 18th, 2011 at 4:04am
 
I agree with you for once Abu, the bible does not exist in actuality, only in bs words.
Unfortunately for you, that premise also makes the quran redundant. What say you there?



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: The case against homosexual parents
Reply #73 - Feb 18th, 2011 at 5:33am
 
Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 17th, 2011 at 10:12am:
muso wrote on Feb 17th, 2011 at 9:50am:
I don't have many prejudices, but I do find it hard to reconcile with gay couples having adoption rights. The whole idea seems wrong to me.

I guess you could argue the same about single mothers, but then life is not meant to be perfect.

I know that in this case she's the biological mother, but you'd have to wonder if the child's best interests have been served.  



I agree totally.

A quick anecdote whilst here .. a former work colleague (an intelligent and highly qualified woman too I might add) whose lesbian partner underwent artificial insemination and conceived twin boys whilst they were a couple .. is currently in a very awful predicament.

Her partner and her have now split up .. and her partner has taken the twin toddlers interstate to live with a new lesbian partner. The move was made without her approval/consent. She is unable to see the children who she regards her own (even though biologically they are not hers).

As if that isn't enough .. the biological father is now on the scene and is involved in the bitter feuding and costly Family Law proceedings.

Bottom line? It's a very ugly, messy, confusing and costly affair. It's bad enough when 2 parents are fighting for custody .. can you imagine what it must be like for THREE parents fighting for custody of 2 toddlers who have no idea wtf is going on and who is who. There are 3 solicitors and 3 barristers involved now .. so the legal fraternity is doing well out of this tragedy.

The colleague in question is now a former colleague because she has since suffered a nervous breakdown on a/c of all the stress and is no longer able to work. She is presently on Centrelink benefits as a result and her career is on hold .. possibly for ever.

Food for thought.





lisa this is life..we see this played out all the time.. what makes anyone think homosexuals will never split I will never know..and this will be very much a female problem..as males are not so inclind to go the child route.

this judge got it right.

I too know of gay couples that are having these problems..not that one has taken the children out of the State.. but this business of stopping one partner having access. is becoming very common.. woman as we know can be very nasty and bitter.when it comes to stopping partners rights.

who puts the kids rights first?? we need a court to work that out.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 122792
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: The case against homosexual parents
Reply #74 - Feb 18th, 2011 at 7:45am
 
Bobby. wrote on Feb 17th, 2011 at 11:38pm:
Sprintcyclist wrote on Feb 17th, 2011 at 11:29pm:
bobby - jesus upheld the law.
the law was, when a sin was committed, a penalty applied.

Everyone sins.
Except jesus, so he paid for the sins for everyone.
therefore, the law is not broken. it is fulfilled.
The penalty has been paid, sinners are not condemned to the penalty.

it's a bit broarder than you may think.
ask in the spirituality forum if you wish.


Bible bashers always argue  about what fulfil means
but some more passages drive the point home.



In answer to you I quote this:

http://www.evilbible.com/do_not_ignore_ot.htm
Quote:
“Thou Shall Not Ignore the Old Testament!”  

New Testament Verses Which Demand Following the Old Testament and Law Contradictions:

   I hear so many Christians now a days claim that the Old Testament is defunct for Jesus was the “lamb” to clear away its rules and regulations.  This is just another bullshit scapegoat that Christians use to ignore the atrocities and bizarre laws commanded by their god.  Their preachers spoon feed them that the Old Testament is no longer binding so that they can excuse the majority of evil that the bible promotes.  I am so tired of Christians manipulating the scriptures so that they can assign a kinder nature to their God, that I have assembled a BRIEF list of verses which clearly show that the Old Testament is not to be ignored.  Its laws should indeed be adhered to, for the New Testament demands it!  After this section I shall list where the Bible contradicts itself concerning other laws.

1) “For truly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass the law until all is accomplished.  Whoever then relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but he who does them and teaches them shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.”  (Matthew 5:18-19 RSV)  Clearly the Old Testament is to be abided by until the end of human existence itself.  None other then Jesus said so.

2) All of the vicious Old Testament laws will be binding forever.  "It is easier for Heaven and Earth to pass away than for the smallest part of the letter of the law to become invalid."  (Luke 16:17 NAB)

3) Jesus strongly approves of the law and the prophets.  He hasn’t the slightest objection to the cruelties of the Old Testament.  "Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets.  I have come not to abolish but to fulfill.  Amen, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest part or the smallest part of a letter will pass from the law, until all things have taken place."  (Matthew 5:17 NAB)

3b) "All scripture is inspired by God and is useful for teaching, for refutation, for correction, and for training in righteousness..."  (2 Timothy 3:16 NAB)

3c) "Know this first of all, that there is no prophecy of scripture that is a matter of personal interpretation, for no prophecy ever came through human will; but rather human beings moved by the holy Spirit spoke under the influence of God." (2 Peter 20-21 NAB)

4) Jesus criticizes the Jews for not killing their disobedient children according to Old Testament law.  Mark.7:9-13  "Whoever curses father or mother shall die"  (Mark 7:10 NAB)

5) Jesus is criticized by the Pharisees for not washing his hands before eating.  He defends himself by attacking them for not killing disobedient children according to the commandment: “He that curseth father or mother, let him die the death.”  (Matthew 15:4-7)

6) Jesus has a punishment even worse than his father concerning adultery: God said the act of adultery was punishable by death. Jesus says looking with lust is the same thing and you should gouge your eye out, better a part, than the whole.  The punishment under Jesus is an eternity in Hell.  (Matthew 5:27)

7) Peter says that all slaves should “be subject to [their] masters with all fear,” to the bad and cruel as well as the “good and gentle.”  This is merely an echo of the same slavery commands in the Old Testament. 1 Peter 2:18

8) “Did not Moses give you the law, and yet none of you keepeth the law" (John7:19) and “For the law was given by Moses,..." (John 1:17).

9) “...the scripture cannot be broken.” --Jesus Christ, John 10:35




Any thoughts?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... 14
Send Topic Print