Bobby. wrote on Feb 12
th, 2011 at 10:52pm:
Muso - if you can just make up your own meanings of
words to suit you argument then you can say that
A=B=C therefore A=C and you can prove anything
because you have provided the equivalence with your own definition.
That doesn't mean it's right.
You're trying to apply rigorous logic to the human condition. Let me explain it from my 'window'.
A guy in a restaurant (let's call him Alan) says to his colleague "This curry is delicious, you should try some". He is obviously enjoying the meal judging from his body language.
Person B (Barry) then decides to order a curry. He takes the first bite, splutters and gasps. His body language indicates extreme disgust.
"You
defined this curry as being delicious", he protests. "This is the worst thing I've ever had in my mouth. How could you lie like that? You can't just make up your own meanings of words. "
Meantime Barry's boyfriend Charlie arrives and sits down next to them at the table.
- This is my boyfriend, Charlie, isn't he a sexy guy?
By his body language, and the fact that he's choking on his curry, Alan clearly disagrees. In fact, he's trying to think of an excuse right now to get home to his wife and kids.
Now do you understand what I'm saying? Those terms that are subject to individual human taste, perception, culture etc are not possible to define as rigidly as you would want in order to win an argument.
Religion is one of these things. De gustibus non est disputandum.