Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 22
Send Topic Print
GILLARDS FLOOD LEVY (Read 39155 times)
Andrei.Hicks
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23818
Carlsbad, CA
Gender: male
Re: GILLARDS FLOOD LEVY
Reply #30 - Jan 27th, 2011 at 6:12pm
 
buzzanddidj wrote on Jan 27th, 2011 at 5:28pm:
whatsforme wrote on Jan 27th, 2011 at 5:01pm:
Isn't it funny that the ones that won't be paying it are the ones all for it. Think Buzz, vegetable etc.




I paid ALL NINE of the Howard levies, when i worked full-time


WITHOUT complaint - and without POLITICISING them









And now you will pay NOTHING.

You are a disgrace and have no place whatsoever making comment.

I hate freeloaders who sponge off the system then tell us to pay more.
Back to top
 

Anyone who lives within their means suffers from a lack of imagination - Oscar Wilde
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: GILLARDS FLOOD LEVY
Reply #31 - Jan 27th, 2011 at 6:13pm
 
cods wrote on Jan 27th, 2011 at 4:41pm:
Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 27th, 2011 at 4:03pm:
It's a nobrainer idea.
To get the infrastructure back up and working, the option is to borrow it, cut other outgoings  or raise it.

The important thing is, rebuild the infrastructure ASAP.
When in trouble, buy yourself out of that situation.


-------------

yes but like I say its easy peasy isnt it... bung on a levy for a disaster.. we live in a sunburnt country girt by sea.. we are a sitting duck for disasters..why dont they have funds for these emergencies????>..

we found half a billion for schools in Indonesia not long ago we found $43 bill for the NBN..

why havent we got $5billion for this emergency??

seems to me our govts are letting us down.. this isnt something we havent seen before.floods, fires are all part of the nature of this country...
Orange has a small earth tremor..Newcastle had a big earth tremor..we are not immune to this sort of calamity..

for goodness sake we called it saving for a rainy day... havent govts heard of that????how about getting the $4.5.billion back from rudd for a start

What a joke: I bet this guy isn't a tech-head either!

  Cheesy Cheesy  Wink
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: GILLARDS FLOOD LEVY
Reply #32 - Jan 27th, 2011 at 6:15pm
 
Quote:
Isn't it in the best interests of ALL Australians for Queensland to get up and running again?

Of course, but the crack-smokers can't see past Daddys girth!
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: GILLARDS FLOOD LEVY
Reply #33 - Jan 27th, 2011 at 6:17pm
 
cods wrote on Jan 27th, 2011 at 4:56pm:
Quote:
Isn't it in the best interests of ALL Australians for Queensland to get up and running again?





thats ok veg I kn ow its the Libs fault.. but tell me ... why havent we any money in the treasury to pay $5 measly billion... I remember well that 3 or 4 billion is meaningless to Labor.in fact it was more 20bill I believe it was..but why split hairs..

lets not remember all the millions down the drain.. what the!!!!

no its all the Libs fault we know and understand your conscience..

the govt can waste money left right and centre just as long as its a Labor govt.

What's this '20Bill' your smoking on about?

One thinks the other one is too scared to fess up!

  Wink Wink  Cheesy  Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin  Shocked Shocked Cool  Huh  Roll Eyes  Huh Tongue Tongue Tongue
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: GILLARDS FLOOD LEVY
Reply #34 - Jan 27th, 2011 at 6:23pm
 
Quote:
heres one for ya cods..

“The tax is unnecessary,” Mr Robb told The Australian. “It is an opportunistic attempt to fill the coffers.”


Mr Robb is upset. Last year, prior to the election,  he warned that the Australian dollar may collapse under the ALP. The dollar decided to show Australian’s what a moron Andrew Robb really is. He also mentioned that interest rates are going to go through the roof! He mentioned that on each occasion the Reserve Bank met last year as it does every 6 weeks. Of the 10 or so dire warnings of interest rates rises, the rates rose a whole 2 times out of 10.  Coincidently, it is the score I would give Mr Robb for his performance last year.

Mr Robb does not seem to learn. A levy he claims would be nothing more than a way to make money for the government. Why would Mr Robb say something like this? Well it is not only because he is a moron, but because he is really big moron.

While working as an advisor for John Howard, I believe he played a critical role to introduce a gun levy. The Howard government learned to love levies.  We had one for East Timor although as it worked out it was never needed. We had one for milk. We had one for sugar. We had one for a gun buyback.

But according to Mr Robb, the flood damage in Queensland and Victoria are not worthy of a levy. Mr Robb reckons the government has the money without a levy. All you have to do is cut the fat.

I love that term. When a coalition member says cut fat, they mean fire people.

I am all for that! This is how I would do it. I would suspend all superannuation payments for all politicians and in fact direct them to a fund to aid those affected. I think the politicians would love this idea as they love the country so much! I don’t think John Howard needs a pension. Or Bob Hawke for that matter. All politicians talk about how they get paid a lot, so what do they need super for?
Is that the kind of fat you mean Mr Robb? Or do you mean when you say cut the fat, reduce staffing in departments that will then be understaffed and incapable of handling the requests made of them?

Will Mr Robb order a cut in spending on the troops in Afghanistan opting to not buy rifles and guns and instead ordering sling shots for all.

But as I usually do, I digress.

The point of a levy in this regard is this, and I have made it before. We are a commonwealth nation. When 2/6ths of our country are affected by a disaster, then that has an affect on things like GDP

continued @ http://ashghebranious.wordpress.com/2011/01/24/andrew-robbs-peter-to-pay-paul/

Mr Robb will have a big influence in keeping the Libs out of office and reeking of 1950s old man smell!

OK, now laugh!  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
philperth2010
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21092
Perth
Gender: male
Re: GILLARDS FLOOD LEVY
Reply #35 - Jan 27th, 2011 at 6:24pm
 
Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jan 27th, 2011 at 6:12pm:
buzzanddidj wrote on Jan 27th, 2011 at 5:28pm:
whatsforme wrote on Jan 27th, 2011 at 5:01pm:
Isn't it funny that the ones that won't be paying it are the ones all for it. Think Buzz, vegetable etc.




I paid ALL NINE of the Howard levies, when i worked full-time


WITHOUT complaint - and without POLITICISING them









And now you will pay NOTHING.

You are a disgrace and have no place whatsoever making comment.

I hate freeloaders who sponge off the system then tell us to pay more.


I am sure if they were required to pay they would have no problem with paying what was required by law......a bit like your taxes Andre.....you only pay what is required by law......your moral argument falls well short when you apply it to your belief that you are entitled to take anything that is offered to you legally based on greed not need....well done.....you are a first class hypocrite!!!

When there is an income tax, the just man will pay more and the unjust less on the same amount of income.
Plato (427 BC - 347 BC), The Republic

Wink
Back to top
 

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: GILLARDS FLOOD LEVY
Reply #36 - Jan 27th, 2011 at 6:25pm
 
philperth2010 wrote on Jan 27th, 2011 at 5:33pm:
cods wrote on Jan 27th, 2011 at 4:41pm:
Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 27th, 2011 at 4:03pm:
It's a nobrainer idea.
To get the infrastructure back up and working, the option is to borrow it, cut other outgoings  or raise it.

The important thing is, rebuild the infrastructure ASAP.
When in trouble, buy yourself out of that situation.


-------------

yes but like I say its easy peasy isnt it... bung on a levy for a disaster.. we live in a sunburnt country girt by sea.. we are a sitting duck for disasters..why dont they have funds for these emergencies????>..

we found half a billion for schools in Indonesia not long ago we found $43 bill for the NBN..

why havent we got $5billion for this emergency??
seems to me our govts are letting us down.. this isnt something we havent seen before.floods, fires are all part of the nature of this country...
Orange has a small earth tremor..Newcastle had a big earth tremor..we are not immune to this sort of calamity..

for goodness sake we called it saving for a rainy day... havent govts heard of that????how about getting the $4.5.billion back from rudd for a start



2007 Election.....45 billion in tax cuts.......2008 worst recession in over 70 years......revenue falls by an estimated 70 billion.....you do the math’s Cods.....apparently you are not stupid!!!

Smiley

cods gets paid to take crack up the ass for a joke! Oh, he writes on the forums to relieve the tension and all he can recall is the conversation inbetween the manic laughter!

Apparently he must like this.....  Cool Cool
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
Andrei.Hicks
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23818
Carlsbad, CA
Gender: male
Re: GILLARDS FLOOD LEVY
Reply #37 - Jan 27th, 2011 at 6:26pm
 
Mate don't be quoting Plato to me.

The funny thing is, Buzz criticized my conduct in Australia yet I paid more in tax than he, I paid local tradesmen to work on my house, I paid gardeners, I paid window cleaners, I ran a 4 litre car needing to buy fuel etc

What about the guy who accused me of not paying enough?

Pay next to nothing in income tax, rides around on a scooter, and employs nobody.

Hypocrite??

Yep, you're right but it ain't over in San Diego mate. It's over in Daylesford.
Back to top
 

Anyone who lives within their means suffers from a lack of imagination - Oscar Wilde
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: GILLARDS FLOOD LEVY
Reply #38 - Jan 27th, 2011 at 6:30pm
 
Life_goes_on wrote on Jan 27th, 2011 at 5:49pm:
Quote:
why havent we got $5billion for this emergency??


We do.

If it wasn't for the dumb obsession with a budget surplus there'd be no fuss, no levy, no dramas.

The dumb obsession is trying to keep up with the assertion that we are a clever country.

We sell all our goodies too cheaply and make housing unaffordable  for our progeny through the resultant mass immigration and still pretend that we are clever.

Keeping a surplus is the only thing that placates the selfishly tryhard upper middleclass.

Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: GILLARDS FLOOD LEVY
Reply #39 - Jan 27th, 2011 at 6:32pm
 
Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jan 27th, 2011 at 6:07pm:
HEY BUZZ - CARE TO TELL US WHICH OF YOUR CATEGORIES YOU FALL INTO ON HOW MUCH YOU NEED TO PAY????

HMMMMMM, I WONDER.

WOULD IT BE 'PAY NOTHING' AS PER USUAL???

FKING FREELOADER, YOU'RE A DISGRACE.

Too much crack or not enough?!!?

"I remember the time..."  Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: GILLARDS FLOOD LEVY
Reply #40 - Jan 27th, 2011 at 6:34pm
 
Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jan 27th, 2011 at 6:12pm:
buzzanddidj wrote on Jan 27th, 2011 at 5:28pm:
whatsforme wrote on Jan 27th, 2011 at 5:01pm:
Isn't it funny that the ones that won't be paying it are the ones all for it. Think Buzz, vegetable etc.




I paid ALL NINE of the Howard levies, when i worked full-time


WITHOUT complaint - and without POLITICISING them









And now you will pay NOTHING.

You are a disgrace and have no place whatsoever making comment.

I hate freeloaders who sponge off the system then tell us to pay more.

I hate crack smokers so there!

  Wink Wink [... got any Johhny mate: I NEED some more Johhny NOw!!!!!!!]

  Grin Grin
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: GILLARDS FLOOD LEVY
Reply #41 - Jan 27th, 2011 at 6:38pm
 
Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jan 27th, 2011 at 6:26pm:
Mate don't be quoting Plato to me.

The funny thing is, Buzz criticized my conduct in Australia yet I paid more in tax than he, I paid local tradesmen to work on my house, I paid gardeners, I paid window cleaners, I ran a 4 litre car needing to buy fuel etc

What about the guy who accused me of not paying enough?

Pay next to nothing in income tax, rides around on a scooter, and employs nobody.

Hypocrite??

Yep, you're right but it ain't over in San Diego mate. It's over in Daylesford.

Employer, huh!??!

Big Boss man, whoah!

I am now officially scared! Wink Wink Wink Wink Wink Wink
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
Andrei.Hicks
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23818
Carlsbad, CA
Gender: male
Re: GILLARDS FLOOD LEVY
Reply #42 - Jan 27th, 2011 at 6:40pm
 
Employer????

LOL - no I used gardeners, window cleaners etc.

EG - I paid into the local community.

How about Buzz?

Nope - bugger all doesn't use anyone.

Champagne socialism.
"I think these people should be paying more.... what me? No sorry old chap, I don't have any money..."

Back to top
 

Anyone who lives within their means suffers from a lack of imagination - Oscar Wilde
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: GILLARDS FLOOD LEVY
Reply #43 - Jan 27th, 2011 at 7:20pm
 
Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jan 27th, 2011 at 6:40pm:
Employer????

LOL - no I used gardeners, window cleaners etc.

EG - I paid into the local community.

How about Buzz?

Nope - bugger all doesn't use anyone.

Champagne socialism.
"I think these people should be paying more.... what me? No sorry old chap, I don't have any money..."


OMG

You mean you lived!??!
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
buzzanddidj
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 14245
Eganstown, via Daylesford, VIC
Gender: male
Re: GILLARDS FLOOD LEVY
Reply #44 - Jan 27th, 2011 at 8:12pm
 
Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jan 27th, 2011 at 6:12pm:
buzzanddidj wrote on Jan 27th, 2011 at 5:28pm:
whatsforme wrote on Jan 27th, 2011 at 5:01pm:
Isn't it funny that the ones that won't be paying it are the ones all for it. Think Buzz, vegetable etc.




I paid ALL NINE of the Howard levies, when i worked full-time


WITHOUT complaint - and without POLITICISING them









And now you will pay NOTHING.

You are a disgrace and have no place whatsoever making comment.

I hate freeloaders who sponge off the system then tell us to pay more.





I paid the FULL rate of income tax (there were no off-shore tax scams as an option) for close to forty years of full time employment

I now pay less, as I only need to work part-time


Would you call aged pensioners - who pays NO tax - "freeloaders who sponge off the system" ?





Andrei believes foreign investors should have a greater say in the running of this country than its full time, loyal citizens

And the right to vote should be based on income and tax credits






Back to top
 

'I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians.
Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.'


- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 22
Send Topic Print