Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jan 17
th, 2011 at 3:36pm:
It's ok because before the election Julia Gillard said she wouldn't ever have a carbon tax in her Government.
When was that tax enacted?
None out of 1
WOW do you realy want to do this? Gillard has said a carbon tax is HER POLICY weeks after ana election where she ruled it out. ONE OUT OF ONE
Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jan 17
th, 2011 at 3:36pm:
And before the election before the last one, Labor promised not to remove the private healthcare rebate.
Current Policy:
The Federal Government 30% Rebate is not means tested. It does not matter how much you earn or the level of your family income. If you have hospital and/or general private health insurance that is a Complying Health Insurance Policy, you can claim the Federal Government 30% Rebate.
The TRIED to means test the private health rebate. trying to break an election promise is still an electin breach. TWO OUT OF TWO
None out of 2
Quote:not to touch superannuation
Do not think that is the correct quote - all governments tweak supper a bit - the Howard Gov made a number of changes.
This sounds like your weakest point yet. Promising no changes and then making changes (and they were very significant ones) is an election breach.
THREE OUT OF THREE
None out of 3 (not sure but not worth counting anyway).
Quote:to keep the budget in surplus
Both sides were promising the same thing neither were going to be able to deliver in the circumstances. Labor's promise was not actually to gaurantee surplusses.
"We will maintain a budget surplus on average over the economic cycle"
That means that when the cycle goes down they may not provide a surplus. (The cycle went down).
None out of 4.
WOW you really thought no one woudl rebuff you on those, did you? well I did and the score is at BEST 3 out of 4 and the fourth is pretty dubious since it is nothing more than a waffle promise subject to any interpretation you wish.
Not one of your better efforts!