Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print
The Sea Shepherd Is Winning The Battle. (Read 7085 times)
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 50811
At my desk.
Re: The Sea Shepherd Is Winning The Battle.
Reply #30 - Jan 20th, 2011 at 9:52pm
 
Dnarever wrote on Jan 20th, 2011 at 7:50am:
freediver wrote on Jan 19th, 2011 at 9:31pm:
What it shows is evidence of a 'possible' decline. In other words, the impact of the hunting on the numbers is barely detectable.



They are getting a clearly lower count with the same method.

They incorporate the word possible inferring the whales may have gone somewhere else - Like under the Ice.

I think much more probable that they are hiding in Japanese restaurants where they partisipate in scientific studies on taste & flavour.

They are now going to use methods to count the whales under the Ice but this clearly invalidates comparisons to past data as they do not know how many whales have always been under the ice.

Very clearly and obviously a less meaningfull indication of the population trend but a more accurate total count.

I would think a measure very likley to confirm the trend that has already been accuratly identified but it will take another 10 years.




You missed all the more salient points. We are arguing about whether or not the impact on the whale population is even detectable. Doesn't that indicate to you that sustainability is a non-issue?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Belgarion
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5716
Gender: male
Re: The Sea Shepherd Is Winning The Battle.
Reply #31 - Jan 20th, 2011 at 11:01pm
 
Dnarever wrote on Jan 17th, 2011 at 10:41pm:
Belgarion wrote on Jan 16th, 2011 at 4:25pm:
 They have already lost one vessel through unsafe navigation and were lucky no one was killed then.



You are Joking right?

They were stationary and got mown down by a large ship which turned directly towards them when it had been on a safe course and clearly going to pass by a large distance.


You are not a seaman are you?
Back to top
 

"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

Voltaire.....(possibly)
 
IP Logged
 
Andrei.Hicks
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23818
Carlsbad, CA
Gender: male
Re: The Sea Shepherd Is Winning The Battle.
Reply #32 - Jan 21st, 2011 at 11:35am
 
Belgarion wrote on Jan 20th, 2011 at 11:01pm:
Dnarever wrote on Jan 17th, 2011 at 10:41pm:
Belgarion wrote on Jan 16th, 2011 at 4:25pm:
 They have already lost one vessel through unsafe navigation and were lucky no one was killed then.



You are Joking right?

They were stationary and got mown down by a large ship which turned directly towards them when it had been on a safe course and clearly going to pass by a large distance.


You are not a seaman are you?



I believe he is an armchair eco-warrior.
Back to top
 

Anyone who lives within their means suffers from a lack of imagination - Oscar Wilde
 
IP Logged
 
Infarction
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 509
Re: The Sea Shepherd Is Winning The Battle.
Reply #33 - Jan 21st, 2011 at 12:04pm
 
Belgarion wrote on Jan 20th, 2011 at 11:01pm:
Dnarever wrote on Jan 17th, 2011 at 10:41pm:
Belgarion wrote on Jan 16th, 2011 at 4:25pm:
 They have already lost one vessel through unsafe navigation and were lucky no one was killed then.



You are Joking right?

They were stationary and got mown down by a large ship which turned directly towards them when it had been on a safe course and clearly going to pass by a large distance.


You are not a seaman are you?



if it's the incident i am thinking of they were stationary and the japanese ship deliberately tuned in their direction causing the collision to occur.

unsure why you would need to be a seaman to see what is wrong with that
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 60053
Here
Gender: male
Re: The Sea Shepherd Is Winning The Battle.
Reply #34 - Jan 21st, 2011 at 12:16pm
 
Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jan 21st, 2011 at 11:35am:
Belgarion wrote on Jan 20th, 2011 at 11:01pm:
Dnarever wrote on Jan 17th, 2011 at 10:41pm:
Belgarion wrote on Jan 16th, 2011 at 4:25pm:
 They have already lost one vessel through unsafe navigation and were lucky no one was killed then.



You are Joking right?

They were stationary and got mown down by a large ship which turned directly towards them when it had been on a safe course and clearly going to pass by a large distance.


You are not a seaman are you?



I believe he is an armchair eco-warrior.



I can see. normal use of eye sight is all that is required when it is so obvious.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
imcrookonit
Ex Member
*



Re: The Sea Shepherd Is Winning The Battle.
Reply #35 - Jan 21st, 2011 at 12:33pm
 
Saturday, January 15, 2011
Riding a Storm in Pursuit of a Black-Hearted Sun
Day Seventeen since finding the Japanese whaling fleet, and it is a wee bit uncomfortable today after the whaling fleet supply vessel Sun Laurel decided to lead us into a storm to try and shake the Bob Barker and the Steve Irwin off its tail.

We are now over 300 miles north of the Antarctic Treaty Zone Boundary and the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary as the Sun Laurel wanders northward and eastward hoping to unload her cargo of heavy fuel for the Nisshin Maru and diesel fuel for the harpoon vessels.

It is mystifying why the Korean captain thinks he can lose us in a storm. The Bob Barker and the Steve Irwin are far superior sea vessels than this tanker and the rolling of the supply ship has to be uncomfortable for her crew, far more uncomfortable than for the Sea Shepherd crews.   Smiley

Behind the two Sea Shepherd ships in plain sight are the Yushin Maru # 1 and Yushin Maru #2. Both of them are more than a day's steaming from the whaling grounds, and if they are not on the whaling grounds, they are not killing whales.   Smiley

The Bob Barker tracking the Sun LaurelThe Bob Barker tracking the Sun LaurelThe Gojira continues to hunt for the Nisshin Maru and the Yushin Maru #3. Captain Paul Watson has decided that the most effective tactic that can be implemented is to cut the Nisshin Maru off from her supplies. The Bob Barker and the Steve Irwin will be able to pursue the Sun Laurel for longer than the Nisshin Maru can survive without fuel.

The Nisshin Maru has four choices now: (1) quit whaling and return to Japan, (2) attempt to refuel with the Sun Laurel, (3) go to a distant port to refuel, or (4) find another tanker somewhere to refuel them and hope they are not discovered before they do so.

Option two will put them into a direct confrontation with the Sea Shepherd ships. Options three and four will cost them weeks of time.

Yesterday, the crew of the Steve Irwin were accompanied by a large pod of pilot whales.

The crews of both the Bob Barker and the Steve Irwin are in high spirits as this pursuit continues.   Smiley
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
nazcalito
New Member
*
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1
Re: The Sea Shepherd Is Winning The Battle.
Reply #36 - Jan 22nd, 2011 at 5:18am
 
Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jan 21st, 2011 at 11:35am:
Belgarion wrote on Jan 20th, 2011 at 11:01pm:
Dnarever wrote on Jan 17th, 2011 at 10:41pm:
Belgarion wrote on Jan 16th, 2011 at 4:25pm:
 They have already lost one vessel through unsafe navigation and were lucky no one was killed then.



You are Joking right?

They were stationary and got mown down by a large ship which turned directly towards them when it had been on a safe course and clearly going to pass by a large distance.


You are not a seaman are you?



I believe he is an armchair eco-warrior.



Actually, as I recall, the reason the Gil was stationary was because they had run out of fuel and were awaiting refueling from the Barker.  I'd agree that the Gil was a poor choice and should never have been sent to the Antarctic in the first place.

As far as SS's present activities, the last report from the Southern Ocean was on January 15, 2011 when they said they were following the Korean tanker-supply ship for the whaling fleet into a storm and being followed by two of the Japanese harpoon vessels.  Since then, there has been nothing except editorials by Watson and others that could have been written at any time.  You'd think there would have been a report by now on what happened in this past week.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 60053
Here
Gender: male
Re: The Sea Shepherd Is Winning The Battle.
Reply #37 - Jan 22nd, 2011 at 7:08am
 
freediver wrote on Jan 20th, 2011 at 9:52pm:
You missed all the more salient points. We are arguing about whether or not the impact on the whale population is even detectable. Doesn't that indicate to you that sustainability is a non-issue?


No you are the only one with that View - the impact has clearly been detected, The doubt expressed by the scientists is not if it is detectable - they have results showing a decline - the doubt they raise is if the Whales have gone somewhere else - like under the ice.

The fact is they are counting less Minke whales in the relevant area.

I would think that the count from under the ice would mean little without past data. to show how many whales were always there and to simply add these whales to the current count would be misleading.

The missing whales from the hunt area would without doubt be much more likely to have migrated to Japanese restaurants then under the Ice.

Which leaves the question of sustainability open to a nation with a history of pursuing  unsustainable fishing practices.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 50811
At my desk.
Re: The Sea Shepherd Is Winning The Battle.
Reply #38 - Jan 22nd, 2011 at 4:36pm
 
Quote:
Which leaves the question of sustainability open to a nation with a history of pursuing  unsustainable fishing practices.


So why is it you focus on arguing whether the impact on stocks is even detectable and ignore whether it is sustainable? Do you even have an opinion on the sustainability? I also asked you previously whether there are any other wild harvests where the scientists have such difficulty confirming whether there has been any impact at all on stocks. What does it tell you about the sustainability of the harvest if we can't even be sure whether stocks have declined?

Think about it.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 60053
Here
Gender: male
Re: The Sea Shepherd Is Winning The Battle.
Reply #39 - Jan 22nd, 2011 at 5:02pm
 

freediver wrote on Jan 22nd, 2011 at 4:36pm:
So why is it you focus on arguing whether the impact on stocks is even detectable and ignore whether it is sustainable? Do you even have an opinion on the sustainability?


I have only mentioned detability in response to you statements, it was your focus.

freediver wrote on Jan 22nd, 2011 at 4:36pm:
I also asked you previously whether there are any other wild harvests where the scientists have such difficulty confirming whether there has been any impact at all on stocks.


I do not remember that Q and I have no idea but would assume the answer would be yes if I thought their was a problem in this case.

In this case progressive counts have been getting lower results in an area where about 10,000 whales have migrated to Japanese Restaurants. The conclusion is very obvious even though you would prefer to not believe it.


freediver wrote on Jan 22nd, 2011 at 4:36pm:
What does it tell you about the sustainability of the harvest if we can't even be sure whether stocks have declined?


In any species repetitive counts showing a reduction in numbers in a given area where there is a hunt would indicate an unsustainable situation.

In the US when the Bison were in decline people may have assumed that they had migrated to Canada or to other areas. In the case of Antarctic whales they are hiding under the ICE?



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 50811
At my desk.
Re: The Sea Shepherd Is Winning The Battle.
Reply #40 - Jan 22nd, 2011 at 5:15pm
 
Quote:
I do not remember that Q and I have no idea but would assume the answer would be yes if I thought their was a problem in this case.


So it would be easy for you to give an example?

Quote:
In any species repetitive counts showing a reduction in numbers in a given area where there is a hunt would indicate an unsustainable situation.


Not necessarily. Do the scientists involved claim any implications for sustainability, or this yet another example of you thinking you know better without doing any actual research?

Quote:
In the case of Antarctic whales they are hiding under the ICE?


If whales are as intelligent as people make out, this is a very real possibility given that there are ships trying to kill them.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 60053
Here
Gender: male
Re: The Sea Shepherd Is Winning The Battle.
Reply #41 - Jan 22nd, 2011 at 5:32pm
 
freediver wrote on Jan 22nd, 2011 at 5:15pm:
Quote:
I do not remember that Q and I have no idea but would assume the answer would be yes if I thought their was a problem in this case.


So it would be easy for you to give an example?.



Clearly not what I said.

freediver wrote on Jan 22nd, 2011 at 5:15pm:
Quote:
In any species repetitive counts showing a reduction in numbers in a given area where there is a hunt would indicate an unsustainable situation


Not necessarily. Do the scientists involved claim any implications for sustainability, or this yet another example of you thinking you know better without doing any actual research?.



Let me see - we have a process which appears to be causing a reduction in numbers of stock.

As long as the process continues as is the numbers would continue to decline

This decline would slow as the stock numbers approached Zero.

I.E obviously sustainable.

freediver wrote on Jan 22nd, 2011 at 5:15pm:
Quote:
In the case of Antarctic whales they are hiding under the ICE?


If whales are as intelligent as people make out, this is a very real possibility given that there are ships trying to kill them.



So half of them swim up to the ship to have a look and the rest are hiding under the ice?  So the Japanese only eat stupid whale, thats ok then.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 50811
At my desk.
Re: The Sea Shepherd Is Winning The Battle.
Reply #42 - Jan 22nd, 2011 at 7:30pm
 
Quote:
Clearly not what I said.


So you assume that wild harvests become unsustainable despite scientists being unable to tell whether the population had even declined, even though you cannot think of a single example? In that case, please explain your assumption?

Quote:
Let me see - we have a process which appears to be causing a reduction in numbers of stock.


No. We have a process that either has started to cause a reduction, or has for some unfathomable (to you) reason, caused the whales to hide from ships.

Quote:
As long as the process continues as is the numbers would continue to decline


Can you explain the logic behind that?
Quote:
This decline would slow as the stock numbers approached Zero.

I.E obviously sustainable.


This too please.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Belgarion
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5716
Gender: male
Re: The Sea Shepherd Is Winning The Battle.
Reply #43 - Jan 22nd, 2011 at 11:09pm
 
Dnarever wrote on Jan 21st, 2011 at 12:16pm:
Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jan 21st, 2011 at 11:35am:
Belgarion wrote on Jan 20th, 2011 at 11:01pm:
Dnarever wrote on Jan 17th, 2011 at 10:41pm:
Belgarion wrote on Jan 16th, 2011 at 4:25pm:
 They have already lost one vessel through unsafe navigation and were lucky no one was killed then.



You are Joking right?

They were stationary and got mown down by a large ship which turned directly towards them when it had been on a safe course and clearly going to pass by a large distance.


You are not a seaman are you?



I believe he is an armchair eco-warrior.



I can see. normal use of eye sight is all that is required when it is so obvious.


I could attempt to explain the situation in laymans terms but I doubt you would be receptive to the facts, as they would interfere with your pre-conceptions.
Back to top
 

"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

Voltaire.....(possibly)
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 60053
Here
Gender: male
Re: The Sea Shepherd Is Winning The Battle.
Reply #44 - Jan 23rd, 2011 at 12:56am
 
Belgarion wrote on Jan 22nd, 2011 at 11:09pm:
I could attempt to explain the situation in laymans terms but I doubt you would be receptive to the facts, as they would interfere with your pre-conceptions.



I believe that the inverse is true


This shows the vision from the BoB Barker and the Maru2 - which both clearly show the Maru going to miss by a long way and then turn into the Ady Gill.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4Qyrd27kvU&feature=related


Vision from the Ady Gill Shows the same thing.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Brw6JN0lQXY&feature=related

It is difficult to deciede if you guys do not believ what you see or only see what you want to believe.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print