Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
WHY? (Read 2798 times)
djrbfm
Senior Member
****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 352
WHY?
Dec 30th, 2010 at 9:59am
 
just a simple question.
WHY, if everyone is so unhappy with the shape of things here, WHY can't we just kick these incumbents out and get ppl we really like in Gov't.
best,
j.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mozzaok
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 6741
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: WHY?
Reply #1 - Dec 30th, 2010 at 10:32am
 
Good question DR, and I think the answer is that no single party reflects the ideals of the general population, and most people see policies of worth from both the major parties, as well as policies they cannot go along with.

I see many posters here that would be seen as being "Liberal" supporters, whose opinions I agree with in many areas, and who usually post intelligent arguments to describe why they support certain policies, even if I disagree with them.
Posters like Verge, Gizmo Aussie Free, etc. can hold these opposing views, without resorting to the ridiculous idiotic far right fanboy antics of the likes of some other members here who merely oppose any and all policies that do not originate from their party of choice, and the same can be said of those holding the opposite political views, with those who can happily approve of Bi-Partisan support for policies they think will benefit the country, irrespective of who proposes it first.
So I think that there is a solid core of centre left, and centre right supporters, that could happily vote for any major party that adopted true centrist policies, while the loony left, and right, will always have their advocates banging on, creating a disproportionate amount of noise, which tends to see both current major parties, hanging on to extremist policies that even near centre voters, cannot condone, and so the divide continues.

I have long hoped for the Liberal party to split, and reform as a true centre party, ejecting the extremist elements, and I strongly believe that if they did that, they would gather the majority support, very quickly, by becoming exactly the sort of option that so many aussies are looking for.

I would like to think that Labor could do that also, but I fear their union ties would prove to large a barrier for them to overcome, and so my best hope lies with the Liberals, and the jettisoned extremists could form a minority Nationalist type of party in the mould of One Nation, to provide representation for the 10% or so that currently adhere to the more far right policies.

It will need to be a move from within the party to begin with, but if it ever happens, I know that I will not be alone in supporting them, because I get the feeling a lot of aussies are sick of the pandering to extremist views from both parties, and are just waiting for a real centre option to arise.
Back to top
 

OOPS!!! My Karma, ran over your Dogma!
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: WHY?
Reply #2 - Dec 30th, 2010 at 10:51am
 
mozzaok wrote on Dec 30th, 2010 at 10:32am:
Good question DR, and I think the answer is that no single party reflects the ideals of the general population, and most people see policies of worth from both the major parties, as well as policies they cannot go along with.

I see many posters here that would be seen as being "Liberal" supporters, whose opinions I agree with in many areas, and who usually post intelligent arguments to describe why they support certain policies, even if I disagree with them.
Posters like Verge, Gizmo Aussie Free, etc. can hold these opposing views, without resorting to the ridiculous idiotic far right fanboy antics of the likes of some other members here who merely oppose any and all policies that do not originate from their party of choice, and the same can be said of those holding the opposite political views, with those who can happily approve of Bi-Partisan support for policies they think will benefit the country, irrespective of who proposes it first.
So I think that there is a solid core of centre left, and centre right supporters, that could happily vote for any major party that adopted true centrist policies, while the loony left, and right, will always have their advocates banging on, creating a disproportionate amount of noise, which tends to see both current major parties, hanging on to extremist policies that even near centre voters, cannot condone, and so the divide continues.

I have long hoped for the Liberal party to split, and reform as a true centre party, ejecting the extremist elements, and I strongly believe that if they did that, they would gather the majority support, very quickly, by becoming exactly the sort of option that so many aussies are looking for.

I would like to think that Labor could do that also, but I fear their union ties would prove to large a barrier for them to overcome, and so my best hope lies with the Liberals, and the jettisoned extremists could form a minority Nationalist type of party in the mould of One Nation, to provide representation for the 10% or so that currently adhere to the more far right policies.

It will need to be a move from within the party to begin with, but if it ever happens, I know that I will not be alone in supporting them, because I get the feeling a lot of aussies are sick of the pandering to extremist views from both parties, and are just waiting for a real centre option to arise.


I keep hearing you refer to 'extremist' elements but given that teh policies of libs and labor are pretty much identical exactly what are the 'extremist' policies.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Life_goes_on
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 4772
400kms south of Yobsville, Qld
Gender: male
Re: WHY?
Reply #3 - Dec 30th, 2010 at 10:54am
 
Quote:
WHY, if everyone is so unhappy with the shape of things here,


I'm not unhappy, I'm more amused.

I hated John Howard with a passion, but do I think either him or his govt did a bad job overall?  nup

Let's face it, most of us are just on here to sook, bat for our team, abuse the opposing team or say sh!t simply to rile others.

If there are some on here who actually care that much about politics - geez, that must suck and can't be good for your blood pressure.
Back to top
 

"You're just one lucky motherf-cker" - Someone, 5th February 2013

Num num num num.
 
IP Logged
 
djrbfm
Senior Member
****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 352
Re: WHY?
Reply #4 - Dec 30th, 2010 at 5:48pm
 
i actually do believe that most here would like just ONE stable administration.
the westminster system might have work a coupla hundred yrs back, but it's too
easy to "work it" now.
surely this last election was a no confidence vote?

one thing i'd like is the police force be completely separated from the politics.
and nubbled.
no weapons.
no invasive power.
only solving crimes like murder, robbery, etc.
the courts are flooded with petty crimes and vexed situations, rather than dealing with
more serious matters.
a waste of tax payers money.

thanks.
j.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: WHY?
Reply #5 - Dec 30th, 2010 at 5:51pm
 
djrbfm wrote on Dec 30th, 2010 at 5:48pm:
i actually do believe that most here would like just ONE stable administration.
the westminster system might have work a coupla hundred yrs back, but it's too
easy to "work it" now.
surely this last election was a no confidence vote?

one thing i'd like is the police force be completely separated from the politics.
and nubbled.
no weapons.
no invasive power.
only solving crimes like murder, robbery, etc.
the courts are flooded with petty crimes and vexed situations, rather than dealing with
more serious matters.
a waste of tax payers money.

thanks.
j.


we DO have stable systems. your definition of stable is obviously incorrecnt. and the police ARE not a political force. Im not exactly sure what your problem is.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
...
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male
Re: WHY?
Reply #6 - Dec 30th, 2010 at 5:57pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Dec 30th, 2010 at 5:51pm:
djrbfm wrote on Dec 30th, 2010 at 5:48pm:
i actually do believe that most here would like just ONE stable administration.
the westminster system might have work a coupla hundred yrs back, but it's too
easy to "work it" now.
surely this last election was a no confidence vote?

one thing i'd like is the police force be completely separated from the politics.
and nubbled.
no weapons.
no invasive power.
only solving crimes like murder, robbery, etc.
the courts are flooded with petty crimes and vexed situations, rather than dealing with
more serious matters.
a waste of tax payers money.

thanks.
j.


we DO have stable systems. your definition of stable is obviously incorrecnt. and the police ARE not a political force. Im not exactly sure what your problem is.



In WA the polcie certainly ARE a political force.  Laws are drafted by police and then sent to parliament for ratification.
Back to top
 

In the fullness of time...
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: WHY?
Reply #7 - Dec 30th, 2010 at 6:01pm
 
... wrote on Dec 30th, 2010 at 5:57pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Dec 30th, 2010 at 5:51pm:
djrbfm wrote on Dec 30th, 2010 at 5:48pm:
i actually do believe that most here would like just ONE stable administration.
the westminster system might have work a coupla hundred yrs back, but it's too
easy to "work it" now.
surely this last election was a no confidence vote?

one thing i'd like is the police force be completely separated from the politics.
and nubbled.
no weapons.
no invasive power.
only solving crimes like murder, robbery, etc.
the courts are flooded with petty crimes and vexed situations, rather than dealing with
more serious matters.
a waste of tax payers money.

thanks.
j.


we DO have stable systems. your definition of stable is obviously incorrecnt. and the police ARE not a political force. Im not exactly sure what your problem is.



In WA the polcie certainly ARE a political force.  Laws are drafted by police and then sent to parliament for ratification.


They dont 'draft' laws at all. they make suggestions and the parliament drafts the laws. Thats hardly making them a 'political force' anymore than a social service group making similar suggestion s.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: WHY?
Reply #8 - Dec 30th, 2010 at 6:06pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Dec 30th, 2010 at 6:01pm:
... wrote on Dec 30th, 2010 at 5:57pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Dec 30th, 2010 at 5:51pm:
djrbfm wrote on Dec 30th, 2010 at 5:48pm:
i actually do believe that most here would like just ONE stable administration.
the westminster system might have work a coupla hundred yrs back, but it's too
easy to "work it" now.
surely this last election was a no confidence vote?

one thing i'd like is the police force be completely separated from the politics.
and nubbled.
no weapons.
no invasive power.
only solving crimes like murder, robbery, etc.
the courts are flooded with petty crimes and vexed situations, rather than dealing with
more serious matters.
a waste of tax payers money.

thanks.
j.


we DO have stable systems. your definition of stable is obviously incorrecnt. and the police ARE not a political force. Im not exactly sure what your problem is.



In WA the polcie certainly ARE a political force.  Laws are drafted by police and then sent to parliament for ratification.


They dont 'draft' laws at all. they make suggestions and the parliament drafts the laws. Thats hardly making them a 'political force' anymore than a social service group making similar suggestion s.

Not only that, every department (via its senior public servants) drafts bills on behalf of its minister or cabinet. Senior public servants are professionals in their department's functions. Who else would you get to draft bills for, say, a Transport Department, other than the professionals who have spent decades in the field?
Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
...
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male
Re: WHY?
Reply #9 - Dec 30th, 2010 at 6:08pm
 
You'd have to be in WA to see for yourself.
Back to top
 

In the fullness of time...
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: WHY?
Reply #10 - Dec 30th, 2010 at 6:12pm
 
... wrote on Dec 30th, 2010 at 6:08pm:
You'd have to be in WA to see for yourself.


care to offer something to prove that they DRAFT laws rather than make recommendations?

and even if they did (or any other group), it is still parliament that passes them so i reject your assertion that the police ar a political force. I can think they are petty, incompetent and stupid. I dont think much of them at all. But they arent a political group.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: WHY?
Reply #11 - Dec 30th, 2010 at 6:12pm
 
... wrote on Dec 30th, 2010 at 6:08pm:
You'd have to be in WA to see for yourself.

See what? Senior public servants drafting bills (proposed legislation) ? Go into any government department on work experience and discuss drafting bills for the minister with senior public servants... It ain't no secret.

That's one of the many functions of the public service.

Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
...
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male
Re: WHY?
Reply #12 - Dec 30th, 2010 at 6:14pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Dec 30th, 2010 at 6:12pm:
... wrote on Dec 30th, 2010 at 6:08pm:
You'd have to be in WA to see for yourself.


care to offer something to prove that they DRAFT laws rather than make recommendations?

and even if they did (or any other group), it is still parliament that passes them so i reject your assertion that the police ar a political force. I can think they are petty, incompetent and stupid. I dont think much of them at all. But they arent a political group.



there was some editorial in the west australian a few months back that made the claims...I can't be bothered trying to find it now.
Back to top
 

In the fullness of time...
 
IP Logged
 
Sappho
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 1406
Gender: female
Re: WHY?
Reply #13 - Dec 30th, 2010 at 6:15pm
 
NorthOfNorth wrote on Dec 30th, 2010 at 6:06pm:
Not only that, every department (via its senior public servants) drafts bills on behalf of its minister or cabinet. Senior public servants are professionals in their department's functions. Who else would you get to draft bills for, say, a Transport Department, other than the professionals who have spent decades in the field?


Not only that every senior public servant has technical and legal staff that do the bulk of the drafting of the bill which the senior oversees.
Back to top
 

"Love is a cunning weaver of fantasies and fables."
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: WHY?
Reply #14 - Dec 30th, 2010 at 6:16pm
 
Sappho wrote on Dec 30th, 2010 at 6:15pm:
NorthOfNorth wrote on Dec 30th, 2010 at 6:06pm:
Not only that, every department (via its senior public servants) drafts bills on behalf of its minister or cabinet. Senior public servants are professionals in their department's functions. Who else would you get to draft bills for, say, a Transport Department, other than the professionals who have spent decades in the field?


Not only that every senior public servant has technical and legal staff that do the bulk of the drafting of the bill which the senior oversees.

Yes, no doubt. I'm not sure why some people think its a black art.
Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print