Miss Anne Dryst wrote on Dec 22
nd, 2010 at 7:26am:
Those who are advocates of the white elephant, will automatically know what the answer is to this.
The NBN is being referred to as driving on a super duper highway.
What was the governemnt's involvement in producing forms of transport?
It was planes, trains, buses and trams.
Ideally everyone wants an individual vehicle.
Did the government produce the motor car, motor bike, or even a push bike or scooter?
No.
Private enterprise did.
And why was it successful?
Because people wanted it.
Private enterprise and the free market will produce the most cost efficient means.
I keep finding these gems from Miss(I have wiped stuff off the sole of my shoe, smarter than this one)AnnDrivel.
Longy at least lies with some conviction, but this cretin struggles to differentiate between a vehicle, and a Highway.
Longy pretends to have some actual knowledge about tech stuff, but whenever challenged to justify the grossly inaccurate and misleading statements, just reverts to pretending the answer is obvious and self revealing, like all these stupid claims that VDSL is better and cheaper, ADSL2 could be extended to everyone, etc.
All utter garbage.
Copper is inferior to fibre as an option as it has neither the carrying capacity, or reliability of fibre.
Copper is not a sensible choice for a National Network designed to service a growing Nation for many decades to come, and that is not going to change just because some right wing extremist resents the fact that we are all paying for services to be provided to Australians that private enterprise could never be in a position to justify on a cost benefit analysis basis.
Luckily we have a government that also considers the HUMAN benefit, that is why they are a government, and not a corporation.
If Abbott had not been such a fool in trying to block the NBN, he would be PM now, and all this negativity from the right is merely them attempting to validate his appallingly stupid decision on this issue.
Sour Grapes.