longweekend58 wrote on Dec 13
th, 2010 at 7:54am:
Infarction wrote on Dec 13
th, 2010 at 7:51am:
Now that we have discovered why you are actually opposed to it the discussion has changed somewhat.
Pretend all you like but you outer yourself as a "safe speeder" so your opinion on this becomes largely irrelevant.
of course. That probably makes a lot of sense to you. but in the REAL world of thinking people, problems and issues dont just disappear because you dont like them. my guess is that you are either geriatric and drive 10 below at all times causing trouble or you are too young to hold a licence.
What? Who said anything about anything disappearing?
As for your guesses. All incorrect, which i guess comes as no surprise.
What isn't in doubt however is that you are someone who makes excuses for speeding and as such are pretending that you have a concern about so called black spots and cameras where in actual fact your issue is with your beleifs around speeding and how such camera's impact this.
In anycase, what is wrong with camera's in areas that do not already have a lot of speeding related accidents?
Surely camera's along with mobile cameras and police cars with cameras on, for example, long stretches of straight motorway to prevent massive high speed impacts are acceptable?
Or would you consider this revenue raising as well since you should be able to speed if you see it as acceptable to do so?