abu_rashid wrote on Dec 12
th, 2010 at 1:11pm:
There are no Israeli Palestinians. Just Palestinians who are being occupied by the foreign Zionist entity....
Jordan is the 'Palestinian' state.Jordan is the ancient homeland of the majority of those people who now refer to themselves, as 'Palestinians'.
In the conflict that exists between Israel and her neighbours, it is clearly the moslem nations surrounding Israel who are the belligerents, the aggressors.
And the only reason for their aggression, is because Israel is a Jewish state, and because Israel is not another dysfunctional ISLAMIC 'paradise'.
Further, international law allows nations who are attacked [e.g. the state of Israel, 1948], to occupy and annex land that was previously recognised as being a part of another state [e.g. Arab states, 1948] because of aggression and attacks, upon a neighbouring state [Israel, 1948].
And international laws does not prohibit a state which was attacked [e.g. the state of Israel, 1948], from occupying and annexing the lands of an aggressor, so as to prevent further attacks.
"...the effect of such prohibition would be to guarantee to all potential aggressors that, even if their aggression failed, all territory lost in the attempt would be automatically returned to them. Such a rule would be absurd to the point of lunacy.""
ISRAEL AND INTERNATIONAL LAW....Israel’s presence in all these areas pending negotiation of new borders
is entirely lawful, since Israel entered them lawfully in self-defence.
International law forbids acquisition by unlawful force, but not where, as in the case of Israel’s self-defence in 1967, the entry on the territory was lawful. It does not so forbid it,....for
the effect of such prohibition would be to guarantee to all potential aggressors that, even if their aggression failed, all territory lost in the attempt would be automatically returned to them. Such a rule would be absurd to the point of lunacy. There is no such rule..."
http://www.melaniephillips.com/diary/?p=1528+++
The world community needs to ask itself...
Why should Israel return the land it took in self defence, repulsing the ISLAMIC inspired aggression of local moslem states, when those states and peoples today, still declare, often openly, their enmity against the state of Israel???
Why should the belligerent moslem, and ISLAMIST peoples surrounding Israel be rewarded for their aggression???
It makes no sense to try to compel Israel to return those lands.
IMO, Israel should have immediately annexed that land, the land it
secured and
took, as a consequence of Arab/ISLAMIC aggression.
Israel
is the ancient homeland of the Jewish people.
And today, Israel should be recognised by mankind as the homeland of the Jewish people.