Equitist
Gold Member
   
Offline

Australian Politics
Posts: 9632
NSW
|
bwood1946 wrote on Nov 19 th, 2010 at 11:21am: Equitist wrote on Nov 19 th, 2010 at 11:07am: culldav wrote on Nov 19 th, 2010 at 11:04am: This situation is going to get worse. The majority of people with IQ’s about 60 are now starting to realise that a run-down 1970’s 3 bedroom 1 bathroom house is not worth $300,000 or more. By the time you pay back the interest the total amount for the property would be around $750,000 over 30 years. Plus on average $1500 per year for rates = $45,000 over 30 years, and $700 per year = $22,500 over 30 years for home insurance. Grant total of $817,500.
Now compare renting a property for an average price of say $300 per week.
$300 x 52 weeks = $15,600 per year. $15,600 x 30 years = $468,000.
$817,500 - $468,000 = a savings of $349,500 over 30 years. I see what you are getting at, but: is your $300pw a realistic 'average' rental figure in the first instance - and surely you are erroneous in making no allowances for inflation in the cost of renting!? For an indication of future rises in rental costs, what was the comparable going nominal rental rate 30 years ago? $35.00 A WEEK OK, for argument's sake, then... If we assume that these two nominal figures are close to representative of past trends in rental costs and speculate that they are indicative of future changes, then we might need to factor in an increase in the vicinity of another 857% over the next 30 years... So, weekly rental paid for a comparable 3 bedroom 1 bathroom home might be around $2,500 in 2040 - or $130,000 pa... Even at a 500% increase on $300 pw, the comparable rental figures in 2040 would be $1,500 pw or $78,000 pa... Now, I'm not suggesting that any of the above figures are remotely accurate - rather that some of the assumptions made earlier are inherently erroneous...
|