culldav wrote on Nov 19
th, 2010 at 11:21am:
What gets up my nose is these illegal queue jumpers think that the detentions centres are not good enough for them when they originally came form poo-holes in the ground in the first place. Then they don’t spare a minute thinking about the 300,000 homeless Australians every night who have nowhere to sleep besides under bridges, parks, alley ways and in the streets. O think the homeless people in Australia should be given priority accommodation in 4 * hotels before this riff-raff.
Your 300,000 figure includes people who are classed as "secondary" or "tertiary" homeless. Most of these people are housed in crisis refuges or medium-term accommodation run by charities in the community.
Almost all developed countries place refugees in similar accommodation. Australia is unique in placing refugees in detention until their applications are approved - a policy that began with the Hawke/Keating government.
Detention is usually reserved for people who have been tried and convicted for serious criminal matters. More than 90% of boat asylum-seekers detained in refugee detention centres are found to be genuine refugees. Under the Refugee Convention, it is legal to seek asylum in another country, so they are not "illegal" and have broken no laws.
Asylum-seekers who arrive by plane, and who make up the bulk of refugee claims, are allowed to live in the community.The High Court has recently ruled that detention for boat riff-raff as opposed to plane riff-raff is unjust under Australian law.
Not "good enough for them"? The Australian High Court of do-gooders has found this to be correct.