Annie Anthrax wrote on Oct 27
th, 2010 at 9:36am:
If growing a mo for a month creates awareness which encourages men to get their prostate checked, only good can come from it.
Who cares what motivates people to participate in the campaigns?
Well it certainly wasn't peer respect in my case. I donate quite a few thousands to charity each year and tell nobody about it.
As far as CEO salaries are concerned, that is a miniscule part. If it takes $200,000 a year to get a CEO who will earn an additional $2 million in fund raising, it's a good investment.
- and if they raise those extra funds by preying on people's vanity or 'chick magnetism', at least their tactics result in more money going to the charity.
FFS, you lefties (and you're acting like one) [edit - that's directed to Mellie] seem to have an obsession with people who earn a decent salary. If you pay peanuts, you get monkeys.
- and by the way, it's not Public money. It's the money that comes from those who choose to donate, and we get a lot more details than those who choose not to donate. Who gives a flying bugger if nobody else gets that info?
One of my preferred charities is MSF, and that's because their overheads are so low. I know exactly what percentage of the money I donate goes towards the end users or research in the case of the cancer foundation.