gizmo_2655 wrote on Sep 29
th, 2010 at 2:26pm:
You don't need to experience 'God' to understand a religion....
Gods are (apparently) eternal supreme beings etc etc..
Religion, on the other hand, is a HUMAN attempt to explain or understand gods....
The rules, commandments, doctrines etc are human constructs....and as such are quite easy to understand.....
I'd argue that unless you experience God in some way, you can't understand a religion. I never did, but some people do.
I'm not making any statement about the nature or even existence of God here (and it really doesn't matter from my perspective) - just the experience.
Most people who are active followers of some religions talk of God working through them or some kind of personal relationship with God. To them, it's more than just a dry framework of rules.
As an analogy, try to understand about dogs and you'll understand about God (no disrespect intended). From your perspective dogs serve no real purpose. They consume food and it costs money to maintain a dog properly. They defecate over your front lawn and they die after a relatively short period. So why bother with a dog? Many people do. Many people just can't see the attraction of having a creature that is slightly removed from a wild predator in their homes.
Unless you have had a dog, then you will never understand dogs.
A question for you - Do dogs exist in the way that dog owners believe them to?
And I'd argue exactly the opposite...
It's not necessary to have had a dog, in order to understand the concept of pets...
The 'idea' of anything doesn't actually require real, firsthand experience to understand it...
I haven't ever given birth to a child....but I understand the concept of 'children'....